{"id":15474,"date":"2023-11-21T05:08:47","date_gmt":"2023-11-21T04:08:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\/"},"modified":"2023-12-08T07:26:59","modified_gmt":"2023-12-08T06:26:59","slug":"hakim-calisma-kosullari","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\/","title":{"rendered":"Hakim \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1700539805005{padding-bottom: 40px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]1. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc<\/strong><\/p>\n

BDSG Madde 4f F\u0131kra 1’e g\u00f6re, ki\u015fisel verileri otomatik olarak toplayan, i\u015fleyen veya kullanan kamu kurumlar\u0131 ve kamuya ait olmayan kurulu\u015flar bir veri koruma g\u00f6revlisi atamak zorundad\u0131r. B\u00f6yle bir ofisin ve ilgili g\u00f6revlerin devri, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi taraflar\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. (bkz. BAG 13 Mart 2007 \u2013 9 AZR 612\/05 -). <\/em>\u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n mevcut i\u015f ili\u015fkisinde veri koruma g\u00f6revlisi olarak atanmas\u0131 halinde bu, Onuncu Senato’nun 29 Eyl\u00fcl 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na dayanmaktad\u0131r. (- 10 AZR 588\/09 -)<\/em> d\u00fczenli olarak i\u015fverenin, yasal h\u00fck\u00fcmlere uygun olarak i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin s\u00fcresi boyunca ofisle ilgili g\u00f6revleri de kapsayacak \u015fekilde uzat\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde teklifte bulunmas\u0131. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n atamay\u0131 kabul ederek bu teklifi kabul etmesi halinde, g\u00f6revin devri s\u00fcresince i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi de\u011fi\u015ftirilecektir. Randevunun BDSG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4f F\u0131kra 1 C\u00fcmle 4 uyar\u0131nca iptal edilmesi veya g\u00f6rev s\u00fcresinin ba\u015fka bir \u015fekilde sona ermesi durumunda, faaliyet art\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak bor\u00e7lu olunan hizmetin bir par\u00e7as\u0131 de\u011fildir. De\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmas\u0131na veya k\u0131smi fesih yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek yoktur. Veri koruma g\u00f6revlisinin bir yasal sa\u011fl\u0131k sigortas\u0131 \u015firketi taraf\u0131ndan atanmas\u0131 halinde, bu yetkilinin ba\u015fka bir sa\u011fl\u0131k sigortas\u0131 \u015firketi ile birle\u015fmesi halinde g\u00f6revi sona erecektir. SGB \u200b\u200bV. Madde 144 F\u0131kra 4 C\u00fcmle 2 C\u00fcmle uyar\u0131nca ofis yeni kurulan sa\u011fl\u0131k sigortas\u0131 \u015firketine devredilmeyecektir. <\/p>\n

2. Talimat verme hakk\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dokuzuncu Senato’nun 23 \u015eubat 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 9 AZR 3\/09 -), bir edit\u00f6r\u00fcn i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesindeki, i\u015fverenin ona di\u011fer editoryal veya gazetecilik g\u00f6revlerini devretme yetkisine sahip oldu\u011funu belirten bir madde, i\u015fverenin edit\u00f6r\u00fc, yaln\u0131zca yeni yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k \u00fcr\u00fcnleri i\u00e7in test makaleleri geli\u015ftirmek zorunda oldu\u011fu bir hizmet ve geli\u015ftirme edit\u00f6r ekibine yerle\u015ftirmesi. Genel olarak bir edit\u00f6r\u00fcn g\u00f6revinin, bir sonraki say\u0131 veya yay\u0131n i\u00e7in okuyucular, dinleyiciler veya izleyiciler i\u00e7in anlaml\u0131 katk\u0131lar haz\u0131rlamak amac\u0131yla bilgi zenginli\u011fini kullanmak oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 ama\u00e7lanan makaleler olu\u015fturur. Katk\u0131lar\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir gelecekte yaln\u0131zca test veya geli\u015ftirme amac\u0131yla d\u00fczenlenece\u011fi bir hizmet ve geli\u015ftirme edit\u00f6r departman\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken bu eksiktir. Devir maddesinin Alman Medeni Kanunu’nun 305 ve devam\u0131 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lacak bir kontrole dayan\u0131p dayanamayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k bir soruydu. 25 A\u011fustos 2010 tarihli kararda (- 10 AZR 275\/09 -), Onuncu Senato, genel \u015fartlar ve ko\u015fullarda yer alan bir transfer \u00e7ekincesinin incelenmesiyle ilgilenmek zorunda kald\u0131. Senato \u015fu ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir: S\u00f6zle\u015fme d\u00fczenlemelerinin yorumlanmas\u0131yla \u00f6ncelikle belirli bir faaliyetin i\u00e7eri\u011finin ve yerinin s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyle belirlenip belirlenmedi\u011finin belirlenmesi gerekir. S\u00f6zle\u015fmede daha detayl\u0131 bir tan\u0131m yer al\u0131yorsa bu anlamda bir yeterlilik kontrol\u00fcne tabi de\u011fildir. \u00a7 307 Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 1 BGB, ana y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn i\u00e7erikle ilgili bir tespiti oldu\u011fundan. E\u011fer ifa y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn i\u00e7eri\u011fi i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde belirtilmemi\u015fse, i\u015fverenin talimat verme hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131 B\u00f6l\u00fcm 106 GewO’dan kaynaklan\u0131r. Bu durumda, \u00fczerinde anla\u015fmaya var\u0131lan bir transfer rezervasyonunun kabul edilebilirli\u011fi art\u0131k ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir. S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin, faaliyetin t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc veya yerini belirtmenin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra bir yer de\u011fi\u015ftirme rezervasyonu i\u00e7ermesi durumunda, i\u00e7eri\u011finin B\u00f6l\u00fcm 106 C\u00fcmle 1 GewO’daki d\u00fczenlemeye uygun olmas\u0131 durumunda bu, yasal yeterlilik kontrol\u00fcne tabi de\u011fildir. S\u00f6zle\u015fme d\u00fczenlemesi, genel \u015fartlar ve ko\u015fullar i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli olan yorumlama ilkeleri dikkate al\u0131narak, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 106 GewO’nun maddi i\u00e7eri\u011fine ili\u015fkin s\u0131n\u0131rlamay\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmelidir. Rezervasyon B\u00f6l\u00fcm 106 GewO’nun \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7erse B\u00f6l\u00fcm 307 Paragraf 1 BGB uyar\u0131nca s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z bir i\u00e7erik kontrol\u00fc ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilir. \u0130\u015fverenin, s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyle kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan faaliyeti, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n zarar\u0131na de\u011fi\u015fiklik bildirimi yapmadan daha d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck de\u011ferli faaliyetleri i\u00e7erecek \u015fekilde tek tarafl\u0131 olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirme hakk\u0131n\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutmas\u0131 halinde, bu genellikle makul olmayan bir dezavantaj te\u015fkil eder. \u00a7 307 F\u0131kra 1 No. 1 ile birlikte. Paragraf 2 No. 1 BGB. Devir i\u015fleminin sonradan etkisiz hale gelmesi halinde, i\u015fin i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve yeri s\u00f6zle\u015fmede kesin olarak belirlenmemi\u015f olsa dahi, i\u015fverenin talimat verme hakk\u0131na tabi olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, \u00f6nceki faaliyeti ile birlikte \u00f6nceki i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya hak kazan\u0131r. \u00a7 106 GewO uyar\u0131nca tabidir. <\/p>\n

3. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi<\/strong><\/p>\n

Onuncu Senato, 23 Haziran 2010 tarihli karar\u0131nda (- 10 AZR 543\/09 -),<\/em> kimya end\u00fcstrisine y\u00f6nelik genel toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin (MTV)<\/em> 5. K\u0131s\u0131m, II. K\u0131sm\u0131ndaki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi d\u00fczenlemelerinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131dakilerle uyumlulu\u011funu incelemek zorundayd\u0131: ArbZG. Daha sonra di\u011fer \u015feylerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra \u015funlar\u0131 uygulay\u0131n: \u015eirketin itfaiye te\u015fkilat\u0131 i\u00e7in, sekiz saatlik \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi, i\u015f i\u00e7in bekleme s\u00fcresi ve bekleme dinlenme s\u00fcresinden olu\u015fan 24 saatlik hizmetler ad\u0131 verilen hizmet. Senato, ArbZG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 7 Paragraf 2a’ya dayanarak toplu pazarl\u0131k d\u00fczenlemelerinin izin verilebilir oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirdi. Bu standarda g\u00f6re, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerinin d\u00fczenli ve \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde i\u015fe uygunluk veya \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 \u00fczerine g\u00f6rev i\u00e7ermesi ve \u00f6zel d\u00fczenlemelerin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamas\u0131 durumunda, toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile i\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc ba\u015f\u0131na \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatleri tazminats\u0131z olarak sekiz saatin \u00fczerine \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131labilir. \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar tehlikeye at\u0131lmaz. Y\u00f6netmelik, ortalama haftal\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresinin s\u00fcrekli olarak 48 saati a\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine izin vermektedir. Bekleme dinlenmesi ayn\u0131 zamanda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerini de kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan MTV B\u00f6l\u00fcm 5, B\u00f6l\u00fcm II uyar\u0131nca 24 saatlik vardiyalarda da durum b\u00f6yledir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 2 Paragraf 1 ArbZG temsil eder. ArbZG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 7 (2a)’n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almak i\u00e7in \u201c\u00f6zel d\u00fczenlemeler\u201d gerektirdi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde, ArbSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 5 uyar\u0131nca bir risk analizinin haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 gibi i\u015f sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hukukunun genel gereklilikleri de ge\u00e7erlidir. \u2013 yeterli de\u011fil. Kanunun \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7en ek d\u00fczenlemelere ihtiya\u00e7 var. Fabrika itfaiyesi i\u00e7in B\u00f6l\u00fcm 5 B\u00f6l\u00fcm II MTV ile birlikte. Burada akdedilen \u015firket s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tehlikeye at\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almaktad\u0131r. Senato, ArbZG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 7 Paragraf 2a ile toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131na tan\u0131nan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerinin uzat\u0131lmas\u0131 ihtimalinin 4 Kas\u0131m 2003 tarihli 2003\/88\/EC say\u0131l\u0131 Direktifin 22. Maddesini ihlal edip etmedi\u011fi konusunda a\u00e7\u0131k b\u0131rakabildi. ArbZG’nin, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n g\u00fcvenli\u011fi ve sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin genel ilkelere ve gerekli \u00f6nlemlere uyum i\u00e7in belirli gereklilikler belirlemesi gerekse bile, \u00f6zel taraflar aras\u0131nda bu temelde akdedilen toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler de dahil olmak \u00fczere ArbZG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 7 Paragraf 2a ArbZG ge\u00e7erlili\u011fini korur. Bu a\u00e7\u0131dan bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, kararla ilgisizli\u011fi nedeniyle konuyu Avrupa Birli\u011fi Adalet Divan\u0131’na g\u00f6nderme zorunlulu\u011fu yoktu. <\/p>\n

4. Personel Alma<\/strong><\/p>\n

Emeklilik b\u00fcrolar\u0131n\u0131n Kuzey Ren-Vestfalya eyaletinin genel idaresine entegrasyonuna ili\u015fkin yasa (Vers\u00c4mtEinglG)<\/em> arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla, Kuzey Ren-Vestfalya’daki feshedilen emeklilik b\u00fcrolar\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar yasa gere\u011fi di\u011fer eyalet makamlar\u0131na devredilir veya ba\u015fka devlet kurumlar\u0131na atan\u0131rlar. Belediye \u015firketlerinin istihdam ili\u015fkilerini s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcrken personel temini yoluyla bu g\u00f6revi y\u00fcr\u00fctebilmeleri i\u00e7in arsa tahsisi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Onuncu Senato, 14 Temmuz 2010 tarihli karar\u0131nda (- 10 AZR 182\/09 -)<\/em>, Vers\u00c4mt-EinglG’ye dayal\u0131 olarak personel sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n yasal olarak etkili oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirdi. S\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayal\u0131 veya kolektif bir hukuki temele ba\u015fvurmaya gerek yoktu. Vers\u00c4mtEinglG daha \u00fcst d\u00fczey yasalarla uyumludur. Eyalet yasama organ\u0131n\u0131n yasama yetkisi vard\u0131. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n, Temel Kanun’un 12. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131yla korunan g\u00f6revlerini yerine getirme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale, kamu yarar\u0131na ili\u015fkin makul gerek\u00e7elerle me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu ayn\u0131 zamanda Anayasa’n\u0131n 9. Maddesinin 3. F\u0131kras\u0131 ile korunan toplu pazarl\u0131k \u00f6zerkli\u011fine kanun taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc m\u00fcdahale i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n ilgili belediye \u015firketlerine atanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan Vers\u00c4mtEinglG’de \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tahsis plan\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlarken, devletin bir puan plan\u0131 kullanmas\u0131na izin verildi. Se\u00e7imin amac\u0131na (\u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yeri de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi) ili\u015fkin olarak ya\u015f ve hizmet s\u00fcresine di\u011fer fakt\u00f6rlere g\u00f6re daha az a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k verilmesinde herhangi bir sak\u0131nca yoktur. Bu AGG’yi ihlal etmedi. Ancak, kullan\u0131lan puan \u015femas\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n, i\u015f kayg\u0131lar\u0131 ve sosyal kriterler dikkate al\u0131narak, tedbirin kendileri i\u00e7in makul olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 her \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 kontrol edilmesi gerekiyordu. Belirleyici fakt\u00f6r, i\u015fverenin ihtiyari karar\u0131 vermek zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktayd\u0131. Transfer yapan departmanlar\u0131n personel konseylerinin, personel al\u0131m\u0131 konusunda ortak karar verme hakk\u0131 yoktu. Bu kelimenin tam anlam\u0131yla bir transfer de\u011fil. \u00a7 72 Paragraf 1 No. 5 LPVG NW. Bu standard\u0131n benzer bir uygulamas\u0131 kanunda kas\u0131ts\u0131z bir bo\u015fluk bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Senato, kabul ofisine entegrasyonun, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 72 Paragraf 1 No. 1 LPVG NW uyar\u0131nca yerel personel konseyinin ortak karar vermesini gerektirip gerektirmedi\u011fi konusunda a\u00e7\u0131k b\u0131rakabildi. Personel konseyinin kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n olmamas\u0131, yaln\u0131zca personel konseyinin tedbirin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmesi durumunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n performans\u0131 reddetme hakk\u0131na yol a\u00e7maktad\u0131r. Durum b\u00f6yle de\u011fildi. <\/p>\n

5. Referans maddeleri<\/strong><\/p>\n

Toplu pazarl\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine sahip bir i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan 1 Ocak 2002’den \u00f6nce imzalanan i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesindeki bir madde (s\u00f6zde eski s\u00f6zle\u015fme),<\/em> \u015eirketle ilgili toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmelere at\u0131fta bulunan s\u00f6zle\u015fme, D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato’nun i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re, g\u00fcvenin korunmas\u0131 nedeniyle d\u00fczenli olarak f\u0131rsat e\u015fitli\u011fi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi olarak yorumlanmal\u0131d\u0131r.(BAG 18. Nisan 2007 \u2013 4 AZR 652\/05 -). <\/em>Bu, 27 Ocak 2010 tarihli Senato karar\u0131na g\u00f6redir. (- 4 AZR 570\/08 -)<\/em> eski s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada genel olarak ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 oldu\u011fu b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde beyan edilen bir toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye at\u0131fta bulundu\u011fu ger\u00e7e\u011fiyle \u00e7eli\u015fmemektedir. Toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerin genel ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 niteli\u011fine ra\u011fmen, i\u015fveren derne\u011fine \u00fcye olmas\u0131 nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin akdi s\u0131ras\u0131nda toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olan i\u015fveren i\u00e7in f\u0131rsat e\u015fitli\u011fi s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerine ili\u015fkin \u00f6nceki i\u00e7tihat hukukunun alt\u0131nda yatan menfaatler mevcuttur. (bkz. BAG 1 Aral\u0131k 2004 – 4 AZR 50\/04 -). <\/em>Bu, genel olarak ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 bir beyan\u0131n, genel olarak ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 oldu\u011fu beyan edilen toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin azami s\u00fcresi boyunca ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu ger\u00e7e\u011finden kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca, bireysel i\u015fverenin, e\u015fitli\u011fi sa\u011flama niyetinin genel ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 beyanname ile zaten korunup korunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinde do\u011frudan bir etkisi yoktur, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bunun i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuru yapma hakk\u0131, toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler imzalayan sendikalara ve derneklere aittir. TVG’nin 4. Maddesinin 1. F\u0131kras\u0131 ve 3. K\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n 1. F\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca, s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131 toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerle kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 olarak ba\u011fl\u0131 olsa bile, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinde normatif olarak ge\u00e7erli olmayacak bir toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye at\u0131fta bulunan eski bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmedeki basit bir dinamik referans maddesi, f\u0131rsat e\u015fitli\u011fi anla\u015fmas\u0131 olarak yorumlanamaz. D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato 21 Ekim 2009 tarihli karar\u0131nda bunu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya koydu (- 4 AZR 396\/08 -)<\/em>. Dinamik bir referans maddesini f\u0131rsat e\u015fitli\u011fi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi olarak yorumlaman\u0131n \u00f6n ko\u015fulu, s\u00f6zle\u015fmede at\u0131fta bulunulan toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin konuyla ilgili olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Co\u011frafi kapsam\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan konuyla ilgisi olmayan bir toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden s\u00f6z ederken bu eksiktir. Bir i\u015f devri durumunda, bir toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ba\u011fl\u0131 olmayan i\u015fletme al\u0131c\u0131s\u0131, bu nedenle, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 613a Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 1 BGB uyar\u0131nca \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan ile i\u015fletmeyi devreden aras\u0131nda s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayal\u0131 olarak kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan sevk maddesinin dinamiklerine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k ne al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n Temel Kanun’un 9. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki olumsuz dernek kurma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ne de Birlik hukuku h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini ihlal eder. 19 May\u0131s 2010 tarihli bir kararla (- 4 AZR 796\/08 -)<\/em>, D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesindeki bir referans maddesinin yorumlanmas\u0131n\u0131 ele ald\u0131; buna g\u00f6re \u201cFederal \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan Toplu S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi (BAT)<\/em> h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ilgili i\u015f ili\u015fkisi, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin ge\u00e7erli versiyonu i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erlidir\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc uygulan\u0131r. D\u00fczenleme i\u00e7erik dinamik de\u011fil, yaln\u0131zca zaman dinamik olacak \u015fekilde tasarland\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, genel olarak federal ve yerel y\u00f6netimler i\u00e7in 1 Ekim 2005 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren kamu hizmeti toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini kapsamamaktad\u0131r. <\/p>\n

(TV\u00f6D)<\/em> ne de 1 Kas\u0131m 2006’da y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren eyaletlerin kamu hizmetlerine ili\u015fkin toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme (TV-L).<\/em> Ancak y\u00f6nlendirmenin dinamik tasar\u0131m\u0131, taraflar\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 kamu hizmetindeki toplu pazarl\u0131k geli\u015fmeleriyle dinamik olarak uyumlu hale getirme arzusuyla sonu\u00e7lan\u0131r. Tarife halefiyeti ve an\u0131lan tarife \u00e7er\u00e7evesinin devam ettirilememesi sonucunda dinamik referans maddesi eksik kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Y\u00f6netmeliklerdeki bu bo\u015flu\u011fun, bunlar\u0131n yerine ge\u00e7en tarife d\u00fczenlemelerinin de dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ek bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme yorumuyla kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Ekim 2005’e kadar b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ayn\u0131 olan toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi d\u00fczenlemelerinin TV\u00f6D ve TV-L olarak ikiye ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin taraflar\u0131n\u0131n hangi yeni d\u00fczenleme \u00fczerinde anla\u015fmaya varacaklar\u0131n\u0131n da belirlenmesi gerekmektedir. ek s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin yorumlanmas\u0131. \u015e\u00fcphe durumunda, ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen faaliyetlerin kamu hizmeti kapsam\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi durumunda genellikle ge\u00e7erli olacak toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme budur. <\/p>\n

6. \u0130\u015f g\u00fcvenli\u011fi uzman\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n

ASiG’in 8. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re, i\u015f g\u00fcvenli\u011fi uzmanlar\u0131 veya bir \u015firkete birden fazla uzman\u0131n atanmas\u0131 durumunda k\u0131demli i\u015f g\u00fcvenli\u011fi uzman\u0131 do\u011frudan \u015firket ba\u015fkan\u0131na rapor verir. Dokuzuncu Senato’nun 15 Aral\u0131k 2009 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 9 AZR 769\/08 -),<\/em> d\u00fczenleme, i\u015fverene, istihdam etti\u011fi – y\u00f6netici – i\u015f g\u00fcvenli\u011fi uzman\u0131n\u0131, \u015fartlar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan do\u011frudan \u015firket ba\u015fkan\u0131na bildirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc getirmektedir. Hem teknik hem de disiplin konular\u0131nda. Bu gereklilik kamu y\u00f6netimi alan\u0131nda da ge\u00e7erlidir. ASiG do\u011frudan orada ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir. Ancak \u00a7 16 ASiG, ASiG ilkelerine e\u015fde\u011fer i\u015f g\u00fcvenli\u011fi sa\u011flama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc tesis etmektedir. \u0130\u015f g\u00fcvenli\u011fi uzmanlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015firket hiyerar\u015fisinde \u00f6n planda konumland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ASiG’in yap\u0131sal ilkelerinden biridir. Bu, bu g\u00f6revlilerin ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flar ve etkilerini g\u00fc\u00e7lendirir. Bu nedenle kamu i\u015fvereninin de -k\u0131demli- i\u015f g\u00fcvenli\u011fi uzman\u0131n\u0131 hem teknik hem de disiplin a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan do\u011frudan g\u00f6revlendirildi\u011fi daire veya makam ba\u015fkan\u0131na bildirmesi gerekmektedir. Bu bak\u0131mdan uzman\u0131n hukuki olarak uygulanabilir bir iddias\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. Randevunuzla birlikte, \u015firketteki konumunuz ve faaliyetiniz ile ilgili oldu\u011fu s\u00fcrece, s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan haklar\u0131n\u0131z ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleriniz ASiG’ye dayal\u0131 olacakt\u0131r. Temel Kanunun 28. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda belediyelerin \u00f6zy\u00f6netim hakk\u0131 bununla \u00e7eli\u015fmemektedir. \u00d6zy\u00f6netim garantisine yap\u0131lacak herhangi bir m\u00fcdahale, her hal\u00fckarda, ASiG kapsam\u0131nda i\u015f g\u00fcvenli\u011finin ama\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fekilde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n ya\u015fam ve sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131yla hakl\u0131 g\u00f6sterilecektir. Kaynak: www.bundesarbeitsgericht.de <\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1700539805005{padding-bottom: 40px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]1. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc BDSG Madde 4f F\u0131kra 1’e g\u00f6re, ki\u015fisel verileri otomatik olarak toplayan, i\u015fleyen veya kullanan kamu kurumlar\u0131 ve kamuya ait olmayan kurulu\u015flar bir veri koruma g\u00f6revlisi atamak zorundad\u0131r. B\u00f6yle bir ofisin ve ilgili g\u00f6revlerin devri, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi taraflar\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. (bkz. BAG 13 Mart 2007 \u2013 9 AZR 612\/05 -). \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n mevcut i\u015f ili\u015fkisinde veri koruma g\u00f6revlisi olarak atanmas\u0131 halinde bu, Onuncu Senato’nun 29 Eyl\u00fcl 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na dayanmaktad\u0131r. (- 10 AZR 588\/09 -) d\u00fczenli olarak i\u015fverenin, yasal h\u00fck\u00fcmlere uygun olarak i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin s\u00fcresi boyunca ofisle ilgili g\u00f6revleri de kapsayacak \u015fekilde uzat\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde teklifte…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":15787,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-15474","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nRechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-08T06:26:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@rasteinwachs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"14 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=20&ssl=1\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-21T04:08:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-08T06:26:59+00:00\",\"description\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=20&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=20&ssl=1\",\"width\":174,\"height\":76,\"caption\":\"Kanzlei Steinwachs\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"description\":\"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":[\"Organization\",\"Place\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"width\":174,\"height\":76,\"caption\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/rasteinwachs\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA\"],\"telephone\":[]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","og_description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","og_url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","article_modified_time":"2023-12-08T06:26:59+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@rasteinwachs","twitter_misc":{"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"14 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\/","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=20&ssl=1","datePublished":"2023-11-21T04:08:47+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-08T06:26:59+00:00","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/hakim-calisma-kosullari\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=20&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=20&ssl=1","width":174,"height":76,"caption":"Kanzlei Steinwachs"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":["Organization","Place"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","width":174,"height":76,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","https:\/\/x.com\/rasteinwachs","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA"],"telephone":[]}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/15474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15474"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/15474\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15787"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}