{"id":15346,"date":"2023-11-20T07:22:19","date_gmt":"2023-11-20T06:22:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/"},"modified":"2023-12-06T08:03:07","modified_gmt":"2023-12-06T07:03:07","slug":"plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/","title":{"rendered":"Plan de pensiones de empresa"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row triangle_shape=”no”][vc_column][vc_column_text]Raporlama d\u00f6neminde, \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato’nun \u00e7e\u015fitli kararlar\u0131, operasyonlar\u0131n d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi veya devredilmesiyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak \u015firket emeklilik planlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin sorularla ilgiliydi. 22 \u015eubat 2005 tarihli bir kararla (- 3 AZR 499\/03 -) \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato, yeni bir \u015firket kurmak amac\u0131yla b\u00f6l\u00fcnme ba\u011flam\u0131nda emeklilik y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin devredilmesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm 613 a BGB ile birlikte B\u00f6l\u00fcm 613 a BGB’ye tabi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 324 UmwG, ancak lehdar\u0131n b\u00f6l\u00fcnme y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmeden \u00f6nce i\u015f ili\u015fkisinden ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda yaln\u0131zca d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm yasas\u0131 uyar\u0131nca. B\u00f6l\u00fcnme plan\u0131, emeklilik y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin devredilen veya yeni kurulan \u015firkete tahsisi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Bireysel \u00f6\u011felerin etiketlenmesine ili\u015fkin gereklilikler a\u015f\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Federal Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato da, t\u00fcm ko\u015fullar dikkate al\u0131narak yap\u0131lan yorumdan sonra, i\u015f perspektifinden bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bir \u00f6\u011fenin \u00fclkenin belirli bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcndeki ticari faaliyetlerle ili\u015fkilendirilebildi\u011finin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli oldu\u011funu varsayar. kapat\u0131lacak \u015firket. Emeklilik y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin bir b\u00f6l\u00fcnme plan\u0131 yoluyla yeni kurulan bir \u015firkete tahsis edilmesi, emeklilik yard\u0131mlar\u0131ndan yararlanma hakk\u0131na sahip olanlar\u0131n ve\/veya emeklilik g\u00fcvenlik birli\u011finin bunu kabul edip etmemesine bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ge\u00e7erlilik kazan\u0131r. Ne B\u00f6l\u00fcm 414, 415 veya 613a Paragraf 6 BGB ne de B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 BetrAVG, d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm yasas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fekilde k\u0131smi evrensel miras ba\u011flam\u0131nda ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir. Bu ayn\u0131 zamanda belediye tesislerini \u00f6zelle\u015ftirecek yeni bir \u015firket kurmaya y\u00f6nelik b\u00f6l\u00fcnme i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato’nun yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re, emeklilik planlar\u0131nda talepleri hari\u00e7 tutan bekleme s\u00fcrelerine genel olarak izin verilmektedir (B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 b Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 2 ve C\u00fcmle 5 BetrAVG). \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato, 19 Nisan 2005 tarihli bir kararla (- 3 AZR 469\/04 -) yeni i\u015fverenin, \u00f6nceki i\u015fverenle birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcreyi, de\u011fer olu\u015fturucu bir fakt\u00f6r olarak hesaplama kurallar\u0131 haz\u0131rlan\u0131rken g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edebilece\u011fine karar verdi. i\u015fletme transferi ilk kez emeklilik s\u00f6z\u00fc ald\u0131. Bu, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 613 a BGB’nin koruyucu amac\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmez. Devreden \u015firketin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131, \u015firketin devri s\u0131ras\u0131nda herhangi bir emeklilik hakk\u0131 kazanmam\u0131\u015fsa, sat\u0131n alan ki\u015fi genel olarak emeklilik yard\u0131mlar\u0131 sa\u011flay\u0131p sa\u011flamayaca\u011f\u0131na ve ne \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde sa\u011flamak istedi\u011fine karar vermekte \u00f6zg\u00fcrd\u00fcr. Halihaz\u0131rda devral\u0131nan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131na m\u00fcdahale edilmeyecektir. Alman Medeni Kanunu’nun (BGB) 613a Maddesi, bir i\u015fletmenin devrinin, devral\u0131nan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar i\u00e7in yeni \u015firket emeklilik talepleri do\u011furdu\u011fu anlam\u0131na gelmez. Bu durum, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 BetrAVG’nin hak kazanma ilkeleri uygulan\u0131rken sat\u0131c\u0131 ve al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcrelerinin birlikte say\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fiyle \u00e7eli\u015fmemektedir. Bunun nedeni, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin m\u00fclkiyet de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi nedeniyle kesintiye u\u011framamas\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak nitelikli bekleme s\u00fcresi tespiti ile \u015firket emeklilik hakk\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fabilmesi i\u00e7in bir \u00f6nko\u015ful standart hale getirilmi\u015ftir. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato, 19 May\u0131s 2005 tarihli karar\u0131nda (- 3 AZR 649\/03 -) i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin, fiilen i\u015f devrinden \u00f6nceki g\u00fcn\u00fcn sonuyla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmas\u0131 ve al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n sorunsuz bir \u015fekilde i\u015f sat\u0131n alan ki\u015fiye devredilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. yeni bir i\u015f ili\u015fkisiyle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131yor. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 613a Paragraf 1 BGB’nin koruyucu amac\u0131, iki i\u015f ili\u015fkisi aras\u0131nda yeterince yak\u0131n bir ba\u011flant\u0131 olmas\u0131 durumunda, \u00e7e\u015fitli i\u015f ili\u015fkilerinin tek bir i\u015f olarak ele al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. Bir i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin bir i\u015fletme devri sonucunda bir ticari al\u0131c\u0131ya devredilmesi durumunda, al\u0131c\u0131, \u015firketin emeklilik plan\u0131ndan gelen haklar\u0131 \u00fcstlenir. Sat\u0131c\u0131, yaln\u0131zca Alman Medeni Kanunu’nun (BGB) 613. Maddesinin 2. F\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca al\u0131c\u0131yla birlikte sorumludur. <\/p>\n

Bu, \u015firket emeklili\u011fine ili\u015fkin alacaklar\u0131n i\u015fletmenin devredilmesinden itibaren bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde \u00f6denmesini gerektirir. \u0130\u015fletmenin devri, iflas i\u015flemlerinin bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015firse, al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n sorumlulu\u011fu, iflas hukukunun alacakl\u0131lar\u0131n e\u015fit tatmini ilkesinin ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131d\u0131r. Taleplerin iflas i\u015flemlerinin \u00f6zel da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m ilkelerine tabi olmas\u0131 durumunda Alman Medeni Kanununun (BGB) 613a Maddesi ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir. Ancak bu da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m ilkeleri, i\u015fletme edinenin i\u015f ili\u015fkisinden do\u011fan hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerine devredilmesine ili\u015fkin genel kurallar\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ancak bu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ge\u00e7ebilmektedir. Bu nedenle, iflas hukuku nedeniyle, i\u015fletme al\u0131c\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fclk taleplerine ili\u015fkin sorumlulu\u011fu, yani iflas hukuku kapsam\u0131nda k\u0131s\u0131tlama olmaks\u0131z\u0131n m\u00fclkten tamamen kar\u015f\u0131lanabilecek talepler s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 de\u011fildir. Varl\u0131klar\u0131n yetersiz olmas\u0131 ihtimali, Alman Medeni Kanunu’nun (BGB) 613 a maddesi uyar\u0131nca al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n sorumlulu\u011funu s\u0131n\u0131rlayan bir iflas hukuku ilkesi de\u011fildir. Senato, varl\u0131klar\u0131n yetersiz olmas\u0131 durumunda bunun farkl\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve B\u00f6l\u00fcm 209 InsO’nun \u00f6zel da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m ilkelerinin ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunu a\u00e7\u0131k b\u0131rakt\u0131. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato’nun 15 \u015eubat 2005 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 3 AZR 298\/04 -), e\u011fer bir emeklilik d\u00fczenlemesi, \u015firket sadakati ile elde edilebilecek tam emekli ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi i\u00e7in artan hesaplama olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan bir hesaplama \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcyorsa, Sigortal\u0131l\u0131k a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bu, kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir emekli maa\u015f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferinin \u015fu \u015fekilde oldu\u011fu anlam\u0131na gelmez: Bu nedenle, hak kazanman\u0131n, erken fesih an\u0131na kadar “artan” \u015fekilde hesaplanmas\u0131 gerekir. Emeklilik d\u00fczenlemeleri – bu durumda federal ve eyalet emeklilik fonlar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcz\u00fckleri – bu duruma kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelen bir d\u00fczenleme i\u00e7ermiyorsa, ula\u015f\u0131labilir tam emekli maa\u015f\u0131 genel olarak sigortal\u0131 olaya kadar artan s\u0131rada belirlenmeli ve ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan tutar daha sonra belirlenmelidir. ger\u00e7ekte elde edilen miktarla orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak ve ula\u015f\u0131labilir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini k\u0131saltmak i\u00e7in ya\u015f s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na kadar e\u015fit olarak da\u011f\u0131t\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 zamanda Senato, erken emeklilik ile sabit ya\u015f s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na ula\u015fma aras\u0131ndaki eksik \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresinin \u00e7ifte azalt\u0131ml\u0131 bir \u015fekilde dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hesaplama durumunda ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren \u00f6nceki i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131 onaylamaktad\u0131r. BetrAVG’nin 2. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen erken emeklilik sonras\u0131 maluliyet ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 devredilecektir. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan, maa\u015f d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc yoluyla i\u015fverenden, genel emeklilik sigortas\u0131nda ilgili katk\u0131 pay\u0131 tespit limitinin gelecekteki maa\u015f haklar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fczde d\u00f6rd\u00fcne kadar kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u015firket emeklilik kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in talep edebilir. Bu talebin uygulanmas\u0131 anla\u015fmayla d\u00fczenlenir (\u00a7 1 a paragraf 1 c\u00fcmle 1, 2 BetrAVG). \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato, 19 Temmuz 2005 tarihli (- 3 AZR 502\/04 -) karar\u0131yla, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ertelenmi\u015f tazminat kapsam\u0131nda do\u011frudan sigorta yapt\u0131raca\u011f\u0131 sigorta sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 se\u00e7emeyece\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. BetrAVG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 3’e g\u00f6re, i\u015fverenin istemesi halinde emeklilik h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bir emeklilik fonu veya emeklilik fonu arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi gerekmektedir. Aksi takdirde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, i\u015fverenden kendisi i\u00e7in do\u011frudan sigorta yapt\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131 talep edebilir. Bu durumlarda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n, emeklilik h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn do\u011frudan sigorta yoluyla uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmenin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, sigorta sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 se\u00e7me hakk\u0131 da yasal olarak bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu, yasama organ\u0131n\u0131n, i\u015fverenin idari masraflar\u0131n\u0131 belirli s\u0131n\u0131rlar i\u00e7inde tutabilmek i\u00e7in sigorta \u015firketini se\u00e7me hakk\u0131na sahip olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iradesine uygundur. Ayr\u0131ca bu \u015fekilde sa\u011flanabilecek sigorta ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n daha uygun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle do\u011frudan sigortac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n sadece grup sigortas\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 mant\u0131kl\u0131d\u0131r. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato, emeklilik haklar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahalelerin esasl\u0131 incelemesi i\u00e7in \u00fc\u00e7 a\u015famal\u0131 bir inceleme plan\u0131 geli\u015ftirmi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n

Senato, 28 Temmuz 2005 tarihli karar\u0131yla (- 3 AZR 14\/05 -) bu d\u00fczenlemenin toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmelere dikkate al\u0131nmadan uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulad\u0131. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olarak toplu pazarl\u0131k \u00f6zerkli\u011fi, Anayasa’n\u0131n 9. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131yla anayasal olarak korunmaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin taraflar\u0131, d\u00fczenlemelerinin i\u00e7eri\u011fini tasarlarken bir miktar de\u011ferlendirme ve takdir yetkisine sahiptir. Toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler herhangi bir adalet kontrol\u00fcne tabi de\u011fildir. Ancak toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131, hukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ilkesinden kaynaklanan g\u00fcvenin korunmas\u0131 ve orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkelerine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. De\u011fi\u015fiklik nedenlerinin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re konulmas\u0131 gereken zorunluluklar, emeklilik d\u00fczenlemesinde de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmas\u0131 sonucunda emeklilik hak sahiplerinin u\u011frad\u0131klar\u0131 dezavantajlara ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Emeklilik hakk\u0131n\u0131n kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f stat\u00fcs\u00fcne m\u00fcdahale edilmemi\u015fse ve m\u00fcdahale ciddi de\u011filse, herhangi bir nesnel sebep yeterlidir. Karar verilecek durumda, toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131, daha \u00f6nce ge\u00e7erli olan d\u00fczenlemeden farkl\u0131 olarak, \u015firketten emekli olanlar\u0131n ve sa\u011fl\u0131k nedenleriyle izinli olan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n genel emekli maa\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 aktif \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n gelir geli\u015fiminden ay\u0131rm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bu m\u00fcdahalenin nesnel bir nedeni vard\u0131 \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131n\u0131n arz fazlas\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131yd\u0131. 28 Temmuz 2005 tarihli karar\u0131nda (- 3 AZR 457\/04 -), \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato, dul veya dul ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 verilmesi i\u00e7in evlili\u011fin en az 10 y\u0131l s\u00fcrmesini gerektiren bir emeklilik d\u00fczenlemesini ele alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00f6len e\u015f 50 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 doldurduktan sonra tamamlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato bu ge\u00e7 evlilik maddesinin etkili oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirdi. BetrVG’nin 75. Madde 1. F\u0131kra 1. C\u00fcmle 2. C\u00fcmlesinin belirli ya\u015f seviyelerini a\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara kar\u015f\u0131 ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yapmama gereklili\u011fini ihlal etmez. Ge\u00e7 evlilik \u015fart\u0131, i\u015fverenin riskini objektif olarak hakl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde s\u0131n\u0131rlamaya hizmet eder. Hayatta kalanlara sa\u011flanan faydalar alan\u0131nda bir performans vaadi, \u00f6zellikle yard\u0131m olay\u0131n\u0131n zamanlamas\u0131 ve hizmet sunumunun s\u00fcresiyle ilgili olan ek belirsizlikler ve riskler i\u00e7erir. Ayr\u0131ca azami ya\u015f ile asgari evlilik s\u00fcresinin birle\u015fimi de d\u0131\u015flanmay\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlamaktad\u0131r. \u0130\u015fverenin uzun s\u00fcreli evlilik durumunda risk s\u0131n\u0131rlamas\u0131ndan feragat etmesi de objektif olarak hakl\u0131d\u0131r. D\u00fczenlemenin amac\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, maksimum 50 ya\u015f ve minimum evlilik s\u00fcresinin 10 y\u0131l olmas\u0131 hakl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclebilir. 27 Kas\u0131m 2000 tarihli, istihdamda ve meslekte e\u015fit muamelenin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in genel bir \u00e7er\u00e7eve olu\u015fturan ve 1. maddeye g\u00f6re ya\u015f ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla m\u00fccadele i\u00e7in genel bir \u00e7er\u00e7eve olu\u015fturmay\u0131 ama\u00e7layan 2000\/78\/EC say\u0131l\u0131 Konsey Direktifi, ba\u015fka hi\u00e7bir \u015feye yol a\u00e7maz. Sonu\u00e7. Direktifin uygulama s\u00fcresi hen\u00fcz dolmad\u0131. Temel Kanunun 6. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmamaktad\u0131r. E\u015flere herhangi bir bask\u0131 uygulanmad\u0131. \u0130\u015fverenin hak vererek evlili\u011fi te\u015fvik etme zorunlulu\u011fu yoktur. BetrAVG nF \u00a7 1 b’ye g\u00f6re, i\u015f ili\u015fkisi sigortal\u0131 olay meydana gelmeden \u00f6nce, ancak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan 30 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 doldurduktan ve emeklilik taahh\u00fcd\u00fc bu noktada en az 5 y\u0131ld\u0131r mevcut olduktan sonra sona ererse, \u015firket emeklilik yard\u0131mlar\u0131ndan yararlanma hakk\u0131 kaybedilmez hale gelir. BetrAVG’nin (aF) 1. Maddesinin 31 Aral\u0131k 2000 tarihine kadar ge\u00e7erli olan versiyonuna g\u00f6re, bu hak, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 35 ya\u015f\u0131nda olmas\u0131 ve emeklilik taahh\u00fcd\u00fcn\u00fcn en az 10 y\u0131l boyunca mevcut olmas\u0131 veya emeklilik taahh\u00fcd\u00fcn\u00fcn ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 olmas\u0131 durumunda kazan\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u015eirketin hizmetinin en az 12 y\u0131l \u00f6nce olmas\u0131 ve emeklilik taahh\u00fcd\u00fcn\u00fcn en az 3 y\u0131ld\u0131r mevcut olmas\u0131. <\/p>\n

\u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato’nun 18 Ekim 2005 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 3 AZR 506\/04 -), bu eski d\u00fczenleme daha \u00fcst d\u00fczey kanunlarla uyumludur. Temel Kanun’un 3. Maddesini veya Avrupa hukuku kapsam\u0131ndaki e\u015fit \u00fccret \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmemektedir. Her t\u00fcrl\u00fc e\u015fit olmayan muamele, cinsiyete dayal\u0131 ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131kla hi\u00e7bir ilgisi olmayan nesnel fakt\u00f6rlerle me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. BetrAVG’nin eski versiyonunun 1. Madde 1. F\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n hakedi\u015f h\u00fckm\u00fc ile yasama organ\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n sosyal korunmas\u0131 lehine i\u015fverenlerin s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc k\u0131s\u0131tlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Standart emeklilik ya\u015f\u0131ndan \u00e7ok \u00f6nce edinilen haklar\u0131n daha sonra edinilenlere g\u00f6re daha az korunmaya de\u011fer oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek eylem kapsam\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato, 18 Ocak 2005 tarihli karar\u0131nda (- 3 ABR 21\/04 -), \u015firket s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde d\u00fczenlenen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n \u015firket emeklilik taleplerinin, \u015firket ortaklar\u0131 aras\u0131nda, \u015firket emeklilik haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u015firkete ba\u011flanmadan \u00f6nce nas\u0131l hesaplanaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin anla\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ele ald\u0131. Erken emekli olmak amac\u0131yla erken emeklilik maa\u015f\u0131 talep edebilirsiniz. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato, i\u015fverenin, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin akdedildi\u011fi anda i\u015f konseyine uygulanmas\u0131yla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011funa karar verdi. Yap\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin mutabakata var\u0131larak uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ama\u00e7layan bu iddia, S\u00f6zle\u015fme anlam\u0131nda bir i\u015f anayasas\u0131 hukuku meselesidir. Karar verme s\u00fcrecinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm 80 Paragraf 1 ArbGG’ye g\u00f6re ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi B\u00f6l\u00fcm 2a Paragraf 1 No. 1 ArbGG. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle belirlenen bireysel hukuki taleplerinden ay\u0131rt edilmelidir. \u0130\u015f konseyi bu iddialar\u0131 kendi ad\u0131na ileri s\u00fcremez. Bireysel hukuki koruma, i\u015fveren\/i\u015f konseyi ili\u015fkisine kayd\u0131r\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fanlar, haklar\u0131n\u0131 uygulama masraflar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015f konseyini dahil ederek i\u015fverene y\u00fckleyemezler. Karar verme s\u00fcrecinde \u015firket ortaklar\u0131, bir \u015firket s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin yaln\u0131zca etkilili\u011fini veya ge\u00e7erlili\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturmakla kalmay\u0131p, ayn\u0131 zamanda yorumlanmas\u0131n\u0131 da sa\u011flayabilirler. Ancak yorum uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde yap\u0131lan anla\u015fmalar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fine ili\u015fkin olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. \u0130\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin herhangi bir h\u00fck\u00fcm i\u00e7ermemesi ve i\u015fverenin toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri veya yasal d\u00fczenlemeleri uygulamas\u0131 halinde, i\u015f konseyinin i\u015f anayasas\u0131n\u0131 uygulama hakk\u0131 yoktur. Senato taraf\u0131ndan kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan prosed\u00fcrde, BetrAVG’nin 2. ve 6. maddelerindeki temel hukuki de\u011ferlendirmelerin hangi hesaplama y\u00f6ntemine yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. \u0130\u015fyeri anayasas\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki uygulama hakk\u0131 bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kapsamamaktad\u0131r. <\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no”][vc_column][vc_empty_space][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row triangle_shape=”no”][vc_column][vc_column_text]Raporlama d\u00f6neminde, \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato’nun \u00e7e\u015fitli kararlar\u0131, operasyonlar\u0131n d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi veya devredilmesiyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak \u015firket emeklilik planlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin sorularla ilgiliydi. 22 \u015eubat 2005 tarihli bir kararla (- 3 AZR 499\/03 -) \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato, yeni bir \u015firket kurmak amac\u0131yla b\u00f6l\u00fcnme ba\u011flam\u0131nda emeklilik y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin devredilmesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm 613 a BGB ile birlikte B\u00f6l\u00fcm 613 a BGB’ye tabi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 324 UmwG, ancak lehdar\u0131n b\u00f6l\u00fcnme y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmeden \u00f6nce i\u015f ili\u015fkisinden ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda yaln\u0131zca d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm yasas\u0131 uyar\u0131nca. B\u00f6l\u00fcnme plan\u0131, emeklilik y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin devredilen veya yeni kurulan \u015firkete tahsisi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Bireysel \u00f6\u011felerin etiketlenmesine ili\u015fkin gereklilikler a\u015f\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Federal Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato da, t\u00fcm…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10678,"parent":12826,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-15346","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nRechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-06T07:03:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@rasteinwachs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"12 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/11\\\/Bundesarbeitsgericht_Urteile_2005.webp?fit=200%2C100&quality=20&ssl=1\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-20T06:22:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-06T07:03:07+00:00\",\"description\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/11\\\/Bundesarbeitsgericht_Urteile_2005.webp?fit=200%2C100&quality=20&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/11\\\/Bundesarbeitsgericht_Urteile_2005.webp?fit=200%2C100&quality=20&ssl=1\",\"width\":200,\"height\":100,\"caption\":\"Urteile im Arbeitsrecht\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\u0130\u015f hukuku kararlar\u0131\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sentencias BAG 2005\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/arbeitsrecht-urteile\\\/bag-urteile-2005\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Plan de pensiones de empresa\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"description\":\"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":[\"Organization\",\"Place\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"width\":174,\"height\":76,\"caption\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/rasteinwachs\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA\"],\"telephone\":[]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","og_description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","og_url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","article_modified_time":"2023-12-06T07:03:07+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@rasteinwachs","twitter_misc":{"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"12 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Bundesarbeitsgericht_Urteile_2005.webp?fit=200%2C100&quality=20&ssl=1","datePublished":"2023-11-20T06:22:19+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-06T07:03:07+00:00","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Bundesarbeitsgericht_Urteile_2005.webp?fit=200%2C100&quality=20&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Bundesarbeitsgericht_Urteile_2005.webp?fit=200%2C100&quality=20&ssl=1","width":200,"height":100,"caption":"Urteile im Arbeitsrecht"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/plan-de-pensiones-de-empresa\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\u0130\u015f hukuku kararlar\u0131","item":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sentencias BAG 2005","item":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/arbeitsrecht-urteile\/bag-urteile-2005\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Plan de pensiones de empresa"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":["Organization","Place"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","width":174,"height":76,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","https:\/\/x.com\/rasteinwachs","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA"],"telephone":[]}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/15346","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15346"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/15346\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12826"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10678"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15346"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}