{"id":13867,"date":"2023-11-20T10:47:49","date_gmt":"2023-11-20T09:47:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/"},"modified":"2023-11-30T14:30:45","modified_gmt":"2023-11-30T13:30:45","slug":"sonlandirma","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/","title":{"rendered":"Sonland\u0131rma"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wpb-content-wrapper\"><p>[vc_row triangle_shape=&#8221;no&#8221;][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: center;\">Sonland\u0131rma<\/h4>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h6 style=\"text-align: left;\">a) \u0130tiraz s\u00fcresi<\/h6>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700473847902{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, ba\u015fka nedenlerden dolay\u0131 i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lman\u0131n sosyal a\u00e7\u0131dan haks\u0131z veya yasal olarak etkisiz oldu\u011funu iddia etmek isterse, yaz\u0131l\u0131 i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karman\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 hafta i\u00e7inde i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin feshedilmedi\u011fini kan\u0131tlamak i\u00e7in i\u015f mahkemesine \u015fikayette bulunmal\u0131d\u0131r. i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karma, \u0130\u015ften \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya Kar\u015f\u0131 Koruma Yasas\u0131 (KSchG) 4. Maddesi.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700473857838{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, \u00fc\u00e7 hafta i\u00e7inde zaman\u0131nda i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 koruma talebinde bulunmu\u015fsa, KSchG&#8217;nin 6. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karman\u0131n etkisizli\u011fine ili\u015fkin hen\u00fcz ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmemi\u015f di\u011fer nedenleri de ileri s\u00fcrebilir. ilk etapta s\u00f6zl\u00fc duru\u015fman\u0131n sona ermesi. \u0130kinci Senato&#8217;nun 8 Kas\u0131m 2007 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (2 AZR 314\/06), toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme yoluyla ola\u011fan fesih i\u015fleminin hari\u00e7 tutulmas\u0131, fesih i\u015fleminin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011finin bir ba\u015fka nedenidir ve bu durumun, S\u00f6zle\u015fme uyar\u0131nca zaman\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi gerekir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 ve KSchG ile. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te i\u015f ili\u015fkisine toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme uygulanmas\u0131ndan bahsetmesi yeterli de\u011fildir, ancak toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ola\u011fan i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karma kapsam\u0131n\u0131 hari\u00e7 tuttu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrmemesi yeterli de\u011fildir.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700473870142{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Ancak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelen bir beyan\u0131, belirli ko\u015fullar alt\u0131nda, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 6 C\u00fcmle 2 KSchG uyar\u0131nca i\u015f mahkemesine bilgi verme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc tetikleyebilir. KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 C\u00fcmle 1&#8217;de belirtilen dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresi, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin ilk alt\u0131 ay\u0131 i\u00e7indeki ola\u011fan fesihler i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato, 28 Haziran 2007 (6 AZR 873\/06) tarihli karar\u0131nda, Federal \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi&#8217;nin \u0130\u015ften Koruma Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 31 Aral\u0131k 2003 tarihine kadar ge\u00e7erli olan versiyonuna ili\u015fkin kar\u015f\u0131t g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc terk etti. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 13 Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 2 KSchG, ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc feshe kar\u015f\u0131 yasal i\u015flem i\u00e7in B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 C\u00fcmle 1 ve B\u00f6l\u00fcm 5 ila 7 KSchG&#8217;ye kay\u0131ts\u0131z \u015farts\u0131z at\u0131fta bulunur. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 13 Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 2 ve B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 C\u00fcmle 1 KSchG&#8217;nin B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 1 KSchG&#8217;nin bekleme s\u00fcresi i\u00e7indeki ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc fesihlere uygulanmas\u0131 ayn\u0131 zamanda \u00fc\u00e7 haftal\u0131k s\u00fcrenin amac\u0131na da kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelir; bu, Feshin etkili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h6 style=\"text-align: left;\">b) \u015eikayet\u00e7i g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/h6>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700473880950{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]B\u00f6l\u00fcm 307 Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 1 BGB&#8217;ye g\u00f6re, genel \u015fartlar ve ko\u015fullardaki h\u00fck\u00fcmler, iyi niyete ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak s\u00f6zle\u015fme orta\u011f\u0131na makul olmayan bir \u015fekilde dezavantajl\u0131 duruma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcyorsa etkisizdir. \u0130kinci Senato&#8217;nun 6 Eyl\u00fcl 2007 tarihli karar\u0131na (2 AZR 722\/06) g\u00f6re, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n kendisine sunulan form \u00fczerinden i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma korumas\u0131 talebinde bulunmaktan feragat etmesi halinde, bu t\u00fcr makul olmayan bir dezavantaj kural olarak kabul edilecektir. i\u015fveren, i\u015fverenin i\u015fine son vermesinin hemen ard\u0131ndan.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700473910199{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Fesih mektubundaki bu t\u00fcr bir madde, Alman Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun (BGB) B\u00f6l\u00fcm 305c Paragraf 1&#8217;i dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile, metnin geri kalan\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir d\u00fczenleme i\u00e7ermesi durumunda s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin bir par\u00e7as\u0131 haline gelecektir. Ancak Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu Modernizasyon Kanununun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden sonra, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma koruma davas\u0131 a\u00e7maktan resmi olarak feragat edilmesi, BGB 307. Madde 1 F\u0131kra 1 C\u00fcmle 1 uyar\u0131nca i\u00e7erik kontrol\u00fcne dayanmamaktad\u0131r. Bu t\u00fcr bir yasal i\u015flemden feragat, KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 C\u00fcmle 1&#8217;deki yasal d\u00fczenlemeye ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Tazminat olmadan, bu t\u00fcr resmi bir feragat genellikle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 B\u00f6l\u00fcm 307 Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 1 BGB anlam\u0131nda makul olmayan bir dezavantajl\u0131 duruma sokar.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h6 style=\"text-align: left;\">c) Bekleme s\u00fcresinin sona ermesi<\/h6>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700473948014{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]\u0130\u015fveren i\u015f ili\u015fkisini ilk alt\u0131 ay i\u00e7inde feshederse, fesih i\u015fleminin B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 1 KSchG uyar\u0131nca B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 2 KSchG uyar\u0131nca sosyal gerek\u00e7e a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kontrol edilmesine gerek yoktur. Federal \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi&#8217;nin yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re, bu bekleme s\u00fcresi i\u00e7indeki bir fesih, KSchG&#8217;nin 1. Maddesi kapsam\u0131na girmeyen nedenlerle iyi niyet ve g\u00fcveni ihlal etmesi durumunda Alman Medeni Kanununun (BGB) 242. Maddesini ihlal edebilir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700473958966{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato, 28 Haziran 2007 (6 AZR 750\/06) tarihli karar\u0131nda, fesih s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fka bir makul istihdam olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n mevcut olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, bekleme s\u00fcresi fesih i\u015fleminin ge\u00e7ersiz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015fverenin yaln\u0131zca KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 2&#8217;nin uygulanmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki di\u011fer istihdam se\u00e7eneklerini dikkate almas\u0131 gerekir, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bu gereklilik, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 2 KSchG&#8217;ye g\u00f6re i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 yasal koruman\u0131n temelini olu\u015fturan orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesinin uygulanmas\u0131na dayanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700473970262{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]SGB \u200b\u200bIX&#8217;un 84. maddesinin 1. ve 2. paragraflar\u0131nda belirtilen prosed\u00fcrlerin yerine getirilmemesinin, Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato karar\u0131na g\u00f6re KSchG&#8217;nin 1. maddesinin 1. paragraf\u0131n\u0131n bekleme s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde fesih yap\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda, fesih kanunu a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan herhangi bir sonucu yoktur. Federal \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi \u0130kinci Senatosu&#8217;nun i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re, SGB IX&#8217;un 84. maddesinin 1. paragraf\u0131, orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesinin bir spesifikasyonudur. \u0130\u015ften \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lmay\u0131 Koruma Yasas\u0131 kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, fesih i\u015fleminin etkilili\u011fi kontrol edilirken bu ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h6 style=\"text-align: left;\">d) Uyar\u0131<\/h6>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474011070{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]\u0130\u015fveren, i\u015f\u00e7iyi g\u00f6rev ihlali nedeniyle uyard\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, uyar\u0131lan g\u00f6rev ihlali nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi fesih hakk\u0131ndan da feragat eder. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato&#8217;nun 13 Aral\u0131k 2007 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (6 AZR 145\/07), bu durum KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 1&#8217;in bekleme s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lan uyar\u0131lar i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir. \u0130\u015fverenin uyar\u0131n\u0131n hemen ard\u0131ndan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi feshetmesi, fesih i\u015fleminin uyar\u0131lan g\u00f6rev ihlalinden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474022503{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bu durumda, kendisini \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karmaya iten ba\u015fka nedenlerin oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermek i\u015fverene kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato bu karar\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca \u201ci. A.\u201d imzas\u0131yla i\u015fverenin temsilcisi ya da sadece el\u00e7isi olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktad\u0131r. Bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n, i\u015fverenin antetli ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131 ile fesih s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini antetli ka\u011f\u0131t \u00fczerinde imzalamas\u0131, yaz\u0131l\u0131 formun Alman Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun (BGB) 623. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca muhafaza edilmesi i\u00e7in, beyan\u0131 i\u015fverenin temsilcisi olarak yapmak istedi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir. \u0130lave \u201ci. A.\u201d genellikle imzadan \u00f6nce hi\u00e7bir \u015fey yap\u0131lmaz.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h6 style=\"text-align: left;\">e) \u0130\u015ften \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lmay\u0131 Koruma Kanunu \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ola\u011fan fesih<\/h6>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474070606{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 3 C\u00fcmle 1 C\u00fcmlesine g\u00f6re, e\u011fer i\u015fveren, i\u015fine son verilecek \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 se\u00e7erken hizmet s\u00fcresini, ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131, bak\u0131m y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ciddi sakatl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yeterince dikkate almam\u0131\u015f veya dikkate almam\u0131\u015fsa, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karma sosyal a\u00e7\u0131dan haks\u0131zd\u0131r. . Federal \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi&#8217;nin yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re, Alman Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun (BGB) B\u00f6l\u00fcm 613a Paragraf 6 uyar\u0131nca i\u015f ili\u015fkilerinin bir ticari al\u0131c\u0131ya devredilmesine itiraz eden \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar, ayn\u0131 zamanda yetersiz sosyal se\u00e7ime de g\u00fcvenebilirler. \u0130\u015fi devreden 1 KSchG taraf\u0131ndan beyan edilen m\u00fcteakip bir fesih durumunda B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 3 c\u00fcmlesi uyar\u0131nca.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474091358{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Ancak Federal \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi&#8217;nin \u00f6nceki i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re, sosyal se\u00e7ilim y\u00f6nleri incelenirken itiraz\u0131n nedenleri dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130kinci Senato&#8217;nun 31 May\u0131s 2007 tarihli iki karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (2 AZR 218\/06 ve 2 AZR 276\/06), bu i\u00e7tihat, 1 Ocak&#8217;tan bu yana y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan versiyonda KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 3 uyar\u0131nca art\u0131k uygulanamaz. , 2004 korunacakt\u0131r. Yasan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k ifadesi, KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 3 C\u00fcmle 1&#8217;e g\u00f6re sosyal se\u00e7ilim ba\u011flam\u0131nda itiraz nedenlerinin de\u011ferlendirilmesini engellemektedir. Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin yeni versiyonuyla sosyal se\u00e7im d\u00f6rt yasal kriterle s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474105662{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bu liste nihaidir ve bu nedenle itiraz\u0131n nedenlerinin sosyal se\u00e7ilim ba\u011flam\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 temel olarak hari\u00e7 tutar. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin devrine B\u00f6l\u00fcm 613a BGB uyar\u0131nca itiraz\u0131n\u0131n nedenleri B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 3 C\u00fcmle 2 KSchG uyar\u0131nca dikkate al\u0131namaz. Kural olarak, \u015firketin (k\u0131smen) devredilmesinden etkilenmeyen t\u00fcm \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 sosyal se\u00e7im s\u00fcrecinden hari\u00e7 tutma f\u0131rsat\u0131n\u0131 temsil etmezler ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla sonu\u00e7ta i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma i\u00e7in dikkate al\u0131nacak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan grubunu itiraz eden \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlarla s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rmazlar. .<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474143854{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara y\u00f6nelik bu sayg\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaln\u0131zca dengeli bir personel yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karmak zordur. Ancak \u00e7ok say\u0131da \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015f devrine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 ve bunun sonucunda i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacak sosyal se\u00e7im nedeniyle, ciddi operasyonel sorunlara yol a\u00e7abilecek geni\u015f kapsaml\u0131 yeniden yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131n gerekli oldu\u011fu durumlar da d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclebilir. KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 3 C\u00fcmle 2&#8217;ye g\u00f6re \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n i\u015f transferinden etkilenmeyen k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131 bu nedenle sosyal se\u00e7ime dahil edilemez.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474158998{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 3 KSchG&#8217;nin konseptine g\u00f6re, sosyal se\u00e7im \u015firkete \u00f6zel olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilecektir. Kural olarak, do\u011frudan i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma tehdidi alt\u0131nda olan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla ayn\u0131 \u015firkette \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan emsal t\u00fcm \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n se\u00e7im karar\u0131na dahil edilmesi gerekmektedir. \u0130kinci Senato&#8217;nun 31 May\u0131s 2007 tarihli kararlar\u0131yla (2 AZR 218\/06 ve 2 AZR 276\/06) \u00f6nceki i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131 onaylayarak teyit etti\u011fi gibi, sosyal se\u00e7ilimin \u015firketle ilgili do\u011fas\u0131, bunun \u015firketle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olamayaca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelir. \u015firket veya departmanlar.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474171230{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]\u00d6zellikle bir b\u00f6lgedeki bir perakende \u015fubesinin bireysel \u015fubelerinin mekansal uzakl\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015firkete ba\u011fl\u0131 sosyal se\u00e7im ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131 engellemez. BetrVG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 1 No. 1 anlam\u0131nda bir ana i\u015fletme ve co\u011frafi olarak uzak bir ticari kurulu\u015f ayn\u0131 zamanda B\u00f6l\u00fcm 23 KSchG anlam\u0131nda da bir i\u015fletme olu\u015fturabilir. \u0130\u015fyeri anayasas\u0131 kanunu kapsam\u0131nda \u015firketin bireysel b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin olas\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015firket b\u00f6l\u00fcmleri aras\u0131nda sosyal se\u00e7ilimin \u00f6n\u00fcnde durmaz. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 23 KSchG mekansal birime de\u011fil, organizasyonel birime dayanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474185630{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bir perakende \u015fube \u015firketinin bireysel hipermarketinin pazar y\u00f6neticisi, di\u011fer \u015feylerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, detayl\u0131 i\u015f kurallar\u0131na uygun olarak ve belirli gruplar i\u00e7in insan kaynaklar\u0131 departman\u0131na dan\u0131\u015fma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirdikten sonra i\u015fe alma ve i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karma gibi personel tedbirlerini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebilir. KSchG&#8217;nin personel ve sosyal konularda yeterli y\u00f6netim yetkisine sahip olmamas\u0131, bireysel bir \u015fubenin i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 koruma anlam\u0131nda bir i\u015fletmeyi temsil etti\u011fi varsay\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 g\u00f6sterebilir B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 (3) c\u00fcmle 2 KSchG, istihdam\u0131 devam eden \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n Me\u015fru \u015firket \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 sosyal se\u00e7ilime dahil edilmemelidir. 31 May\u0131s 2007 (2 AZR 306\/06) tarihli karar\u0131nda, \u0130kinci Senato, i\u015fverenin b\u00f6yle bir menfaati hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karmak i\u00e7in yaln\u0131zca i\u015fine son verilen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n hastal\u0131\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zellikle duyarl\u0131 oldu\u011fu ger\u00e7e\u011fine dayanamayaca\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474432366{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Farkl\u0131 bir \u015fey ancak \u00f6zel i\u015f g\u00f6revleri veya faaliyet alanlar\u0131 i\u00e7in (\u00f6rne\u011fin, kilit niteliklere sahip kilit pozisyonlar), di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesinin organize edilememesi veya ancak b\u00fcy\u00fck zorluklarla organize edilebilmesi durumunda ge\u00e7erli olabilir; B. temsil edilecek faaliyetin son derece karma\u015f\u0131k olmas\u0131, y\u00fcksek d\u00fczeyde e\u011fitim gerektirmesi veya i\u015fin \u00f6nemi nedeniyle (\u00f6rne\u011fin belirli bir m\u00fc\u015fteri ili\u015fkisinde), yedek personelin s\u0131k s\u0131k kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ger\u00e7ek bir kaybetme riskine yol a\u00e7abilece\u011fi i\u00e7in Bir sipari\u015f.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474525735{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Sosyal a\u00e7\u0131dan daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc baz\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n s\u00fcrekli istihdam\u0131, yaln\u0131zca sosyal kriterlere dayal\u0131 bir sosyal se\u00e7imin sonucu olarak yaln\u0131zca veya esasen yaln\u0131zca y\u00fcksek d\u00fczeyde devams\u0131zl\u0131k yapan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n kalmas\u0131 durumunda da gerekli olabilir. \u0130\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma korumas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde i\u015fverenin, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karmaya neden olan olgular\u0131 d\u00fczenli olarak ispat etmesi gerekmektedir. Operasyonel de\u011fi\u015fikliklerde (\u00f6rne\u011fin kapatmalar, yer de\u011fi\u015ftirmeler, organizasyondaki temel de\u011fi\u015fiklikler) i\u015fler farkl\u0131 olabilir. B\u00f6yle bir durumda, i\u015fveren ve i\u015f konseyi \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n uzla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 konusunda anla\u015fmaya var\u0131rsa ve i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lacak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara isim verirse, o zaman yasaya g\u00f6re (B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Para. 5 KSchG), delil durumu i\u015fveren lehine de\u011fi\u015fir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474555959{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Fesihlerin acil operasyonel ihtiya\u00e7lardan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair yasal bir karine bulunmaktad\u0131r. H. \u0130\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma korumas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde operasyonel sebepleri ispatlamak zorunda olan i\u015fveren de\u011fil, operasyonel sebep karinesini \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctmek zorunda olan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fand\u0131r. Bu durumlarda sosyal se\u00e7ilim yaln\u0131zca b\u00fcy\u00fck hatalar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kontrol edilebilir. \u0130kinci Senato \u015fu ana kadar sadece karine etkisini i\u015fveren \u015firketteki bo\u015f pozisyonlarda daha fazla istihdam f\u0131rsat\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131na ba\u011flad\u0131. 6 Eyl\u00fcl 2007 (2 AZR 671\/06) tarihli karar\u0131nda, KSchG&#8217;nin 1. Maddesinin 5. F\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 1. C\u00fcmlesinin tetikledi\u011fi karinenin prensip olarak \u015firketteki di\u011fer \u015firketlerde daha fazla istihdam olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131n\u0131 da kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu d\u00fczenlemenin yorumlanmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474591077{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bununla birlikte, i\u015fine son verilen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n bu varsay\u0131m kapsam\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 usuli haklar\u0131n\u0131n azalt\u0131lmas\u0131, yaln\u0131zca i\u015f konseyinin temel ko\u015fullar\u0131 birlikte incelemesi yasama organ\u0131n\u0131n gerektirdi\u011fi kolektif denge a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi s\u00fcrece hakl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclebilir. Bu, \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n uzla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmese bile genel olarak varsay\u0131labilir. Bununla birlikte, e\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, m\u00fczakereler s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015f konseyinin di\u011fer \u015firketlerdeki istihdam f\u0131rsatlar\u0131yla ilgilendi\u011fini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde inkar ederse ve bu t\u00fcr istihdam f\u0131rsatlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin somut kan\u0131tlar da sunarsa, bu geni\u015f kapsaml\u0131 karine isteklerini kabul edip etmeyece\u011fi i\u015fverene kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u015firket taraflar\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer \u015firketlerdeki istihdam olanaklar\u0131 sorunuyla ilgilendi\u011fini sunmak ve kan\u0131tlamak.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474622470{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]\u00a7 1 paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re. 2 KSchG&#8217;ye g\u00f6re, bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131, di\u011fer hususlar\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla ilgili sebeplerden kaynaklan\u0131yorsa sosyal a\u00e7\u0131dan hakl\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n gelecekte bor\u00e7lu olunan i\u015fin tamam\u0131n\u0131 veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 yerine getirmek i\u00e7in gerekli uygunlu\u011fa ve becerilere sahip olmamas\u0131 durumunda, i\u015fveren i\u015f ili\u015fkisini sonland\u0131rabilmelidir. \u0130kinci Senato&#8217;nun 18 Ocak 2007 tarihli karar\u0131na (2 AZR 731\/05) g\u00f6re, bagaj hizmetinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak \u00fczere i\u015fe al\u0131nan (\u00e7al\u0131\u015fan) bir \u00f6\u011frencinin, sosyal g\u00fcvenlik d\u00fczenlemeleri kapsam\u0131nda sosyal g\u00fcvenlik kurallar\u0131na uygun olmamas\u0131 durumunda, bu gereklilikler hen\u00fcz kar\u015f\u0131lanmamaktad\u0131r. A\u015f\u0131r\u0131 uzun s\u00fcreli \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6renler sosyal g\u00fcvenlikten muaft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474636678{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bu durum, bor\u00e7lu olunan i\u015fe uygunluk a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan gerekli bir \u00f6zelli\u011fi temsil etmemektedir.S\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n \u00f6\u011frencilik durumunu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin temel kriteri olarak belirlemi\u015f olsa bile ve bu durum ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lacaksa, de\u011fi\u015fmeyen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131 alt\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam edilmesi makul olmayacakt\u0131r. i\u015fveren a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, sosyal sigorta y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc performansa ve bedele ili\u015fkin de\u011fi\u015fim ili\u015fkisini de\u011fi\u015ftirece\u011finden, gerekli bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme d\u00fczenlemesi, zaman\u0131nda fesih bildirimini de\u011fil, de\u011fi\u015fiklik bildirimini hakl\u0131 g\u00f6sterebilir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474653598{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde alt\u0131 haftadan fazla s\u00fcrekli veya tekrarl\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015famamas\u0131 durumunda, i\u015fveren, Madde 84 Paragraf 2 C\u00fcmle 1 SGB IX uyar\u0131nca, ilgili \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ve \u00e7\u0131kar grubunun kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131yla bu i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik durumunun nas\u0131l \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclece\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klamal\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse bunun \u00fcstesinden gelinebilir ve yeni i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik durumunu \u00f6nlemek ve i\u015finizi s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmek i\u00e7in hangi faydalar veya yard\u0131mlarla yap\u0131labilir? \u0130kinci Senato&#8217;nun 12 Temmuz 2007 tarihli karar\u0131na (2 AZR 716\/06) g\u00f6re, SGB IX&#8217;un 84. Maddesinin 2. F\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca \u015firket entegrasyon y\u00f6netiminin uygulanmas\u0131, ki\u015fisel fesih i\u015fleminin etkilili\u011fi i\u00e7in resmi bir gereklilik de\u011fildir. Hastal\u0131kla ilgili nedenler.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474667791{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]B\u00f6yle bir operasyonel entegrasyon y\u00f6netimine olan ihtiya\u00e7 sadece engelliler i\u00e7in de\u011fil t\u00fcm \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar i\u00e7in mevcuttur. Ancak SGB IX&#8217;un 84. Maddesinin 2. F\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca entegrasyon y\u00f6netiminin eksikli\u011fi, tek ba\u015f\u0131na hastal\u0131k nedeniyle fesih i\u015fleminin etkisiz olmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7maz. SGB \u200b\u200bIX&#8217;un 84. maddesinin 2. paragraf\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fc yasaklay\u0131c\u0131 bir yasa de\u011fildir. Ancak yasal d\u00fczenleme sadece bir program beyan\u0131 de\u011fil, fesih hakk\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesinin bir ifadesidir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474688598{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Gelecekte s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ihlalini telafi etmek i\u00e7in ba\u015fka uygun ve daha hafif yollar\u0131n mevcut olmas\u0131 durumunda fesih hakl\u0131 g\u00f6sterilemez. Kurumsal entegrasyon y\u00f6netiminin kendisi o kadar da \u0131l\u0131ml\u0131 bir ara\u00e7 de\u011fil. Ancak bu prosed\u00fcr daha yumu\u015fak yollara izin verir; B. \u0130\u015fyerinin yeniden tasarlanmas\u0131 veya de\u011fi\u015fen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131 alt\u0131nda ba\u015fka bir i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam edilmesi tan\u0131nabilir ve geli\u015ftirilebilir. \u0130\u015fveren operasyonel entegrasyon y\u00f6netimini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmemi\u015fse, bu durum sunum ve ispat y\u00fck\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furabilir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474701190{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bu durumda hasta \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u00e7in alternatif istihdam se\u00e7enekleri bilmedi\u011fini ve hasta \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle doldurabilece\u011fi \u201cbo\u015f i\u015fler\u201d bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten genel bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapmakla yetinemez. Daha ziyade, i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n daha \u00f6nce \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fte g\u00f6revlendirilemeyece\u011fi, uygun bir ayarlama ve de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin neden hari\u00e7 tutuldu\u011fu ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n neden ba\u015fka bir i\u015fe g\u00f6revlendirilemeyece\u011fi konusunda kapsaml\u0131, somut bir sunum yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. de\u011fi\u015fen bir i\u015f.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h6 style=\"text-align: left;\">f) De\u011fi\u015fiklik bildirimi<\/h6>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474827550{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]\u0130kinci Senato&#8217;nun yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re, operasyonel nedenlerden dolay\u0131 fesih bildirimi, i\u015fverenin, kendi i\u00e7inde kabul edilen nedenlerden dolay\u0131, kendisini yaln\u0131zca \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n makul olarak kabul etmesi gereken de\u011fi\u015fiklikleri \u00f6nermekle s\u0131n\u0131rlamas\u0131 durumunda ge\u00e7erlidir. \u0130kinci Senato (2 AZR 31\/06) 29 Mart 2007 tarihli karar\u0131yla bu i\u00e7tihad\u0131 devam ettirmi\u015f ve i\u015fverenin bildirim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi yoluyla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131nda operasyonel de\u011fi\u015fiklikler yapabilece\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. Aksi takdirde ekonomik nedenlerden dolay\u0131 gerekli olacak fesih bildirimi Orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesi her zaman adil bir \u015fekilde kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474849550{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Fesih an\u0131nda, Alman Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun (BGB) 613a maddesinin 6. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin devral\u0131nan ki\u015fiye devredilmesine itiraz eden \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n art\u0131k i\u015fvereni taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam edemeyece\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131 durumunda Bu, i\u015fverenin, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 i\u015fi devralan ki\u015fiye daha \u00f6nce oldu\u011fu gibi orada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6d\u00fcn\u00e7 verme teklifini ihlal eder, genel olarak orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesini ihlal etmez. Bu durum, i\u015fverenin yaln\u0131zca, devralan\u0131n kendi \u015firketindeki toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmelere uygun olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na \u00f6dedi\u011fi \u00fccretten daha d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck bir \u00fccretle i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin devam\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana teklif etmesi durumunda da ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474862191{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 5&#8217;e g\u00f6re, e\u011fer i\u015fveren ve i\u015f konseyi, i\u015fine son verilecek \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n isimlendirildi\u011fi menfaatleri uzla\u015ft\u0131rma konusunda anla\u015ft\u0131larsa, fesihlerin operasyonel gerekliliklerden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair yasal bir karine ge\u00e7erli olur. Bu durumlarda sosyal se\u00e7ilim yaln\u0131zca b\u00fcy\u00fck hatalar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kontrol edilebilir. \u0130kinci Senato&#8217;nun 19 Haziran 2007 tarihli karar\u0131na (2 AZR 304\/06) g\u00f6re bu d\u00fczenleme fesih bildirimleri i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 2 KSchG, bu y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131k at\u0131f veya at\u0131f i\u00e7ermemektedir. Ancak KSchG&#8217;nin 2. Maddesi ayr\u0131 bir sosyal gerek\u00e7elendirme kavram\u0131 i\u00e7ermemektedir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474903416{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bunun yerine, d\u00fczenleme sadece B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 2 C\u00fcmle 1 ila 3&#8217;e ve Paragraf 3 Paragraf 1 ve 2 C\u00fcmle 1 ve 2 KSchG&#8217;ye at\u0131fta bulunur. Sonraki varsay\u0131m\u0131n kapsam\u0131, \u015firketteki di\u011fer istihdam f\u0131rsatlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 da dahil olmak \u00fczere, \u00f6nceki ko\u015fullar alt\u0131nda istihdam ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131n kaybolmas\u0131n\u0131 da kapsar. Her durumda, KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 5 C\u00fcmle 1&#8217;in varsay\u0131msal etkisi, \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n uzla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n bundan sorumlu merkezi i\u015f konseyi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, \u015firketteki ba\u015fka bir \u015firkette daha fazla istihdam olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131na da geni\u015fletilmelidir. Acil operasyonel ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 incelerken B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 5 KSchG&#8217;nin uygulanmas\u0131, otomatik olarak \u00f6nerilen de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan taraf\u0131ndan adil bir \u015fekilde kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmez.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700474918815{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Her durumda, \u00e7\u0131karlar dengesi, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde \u00f6nerilen de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle ilgili herhangi bir esasl\u0131 gereklilik i\u00e7ermiyorsa, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 5 KSchG&#8217;de belirtildi\u011fi gibi, sunum ve kan\u0131t y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n aleyhine bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik pek hakl\u0131 g\u00f6sterilemez. \u00d6te yandan, i\u015fletme taraflar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n uzla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda bireysel olarak planlanm\u0131\u015f de\u011fi\u015fiklikleri dahil etmi\u015fse, i\u015f konseyi de\u011fi\u015fiklik teklifinin \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n uzla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda yer alan k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirmi\u015f olabilir ve varsay\u0131m i\u00e7in yeterli gerek\u00e7e bulunabilir. De\u011fi\u015fiklik teklifiyle ilgili olarak B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 5 KSchG.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h6 style=\"text-align: left;\">g) A\u011f\u0131r engelli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar i\u00e7in i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel koruma<\/h6>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700475008358{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]SGB \u200b\u200bIX&#8217;un 84. Maddesinin 1. Paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re, a\u011f\u0131r engelli bir ki\u015fiyle i\u015f ili\u015fkisinde zorluklar ortaya \u00e7\u0131karsa, i\u015fverenin kanunda daha ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak belirtilen bir \u00f6nleme prosed\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc uygulamas\u0131 gerekir. \u0130kinci Senato, 7 Aral\u0131k 2006 (2 AZR 182\/06) tarihli karar\u0131nda, bu \u00f6nleme prosed\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n, fesih karar\u0131 84 i\u00e7in resmi etkililik \u015fart\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte, SGB IX&#8217;un 84. maddesinin 1. paragraf\u0131, tamamen temyiz niteli\u011finde olan ve dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131n\u0131n her durumda hi\u00e7bir sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131 salt bir d\u00fczenleyici d\u00fczenlemeyi temsil etmemektedir.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700475028823{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Yasal \u00f6nlemenin amac\u0131, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu kadar uzun s\u00fcre devam etmesini sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken \u00f6nlemlerin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve hangi \u00f6nlemlerin al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini erken bir a\u015famada a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturmakt\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, yasal \u00f6nleme prosed\u00fcr\u00fc, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karmaya kar\u015f\u0131 koruma kanununun tamam\u0131nda bulunan orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesinin somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f halini temsil etmektedir.Bu nedenle, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmay\u0131 \u00f6nleme f\u0131rsatlar\u0131 olsayd\u0131, orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesinin ihlali nedeniyle bir i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karman\u0131n sosyal a\u00e7\u0131dan haks\u0131z oldu\u011fu karar\u0131na var\u0131labilir. \u00f6nleme prosed\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn uygun \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 durumunda.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700475081142{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bu r\u0131za olmadan fesih ge\u00e7ersizdir. Entegrasyon ofisi fesih i\u015flemini kabul ederse, i\u015fveren bir ay i\u00e7inde fesih beyan\u0131nda bulunabilir, Madde 88 Paragraf 3 SGB IX. \u0130kinci Senato&#8217;nun 8 Kas\u0131m 2007 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (2 AZR 425\/06), fesih nedeninin de\u011fi\u015fmemesi durumunda bu durum birka\u00e7 kez ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilir. Bu durumda Entegrasyon B\u00fcrosunun onay\u0131 &#8220;kullan\u0131lamaz&#8221;. A\u011f\u0131r engellilerin bir ay s\u00fcreyle i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131yor. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde fesih ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 kalmas\u0131 durumunda i\u015fveren, Entegrasyon Ofisi&#8217;nden ayr\u0131ca onay almas\u0131na gerek kalmaks\u0131z\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi birka\u00e7 kez feshedebilir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700475064895{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bunun tersine, e\u011fer fesih \u00f6nleme prosed\u00fcr\u00fc ile \u00f6nlenemiyorsa, \u00f6nleme prosed\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn uygulanmamas\u0131 fesih i\u015flemini engellemez. Entegrasyon B\u00fcrosu kapsaml\u0131 bir incelemeden sonra fesih i\u00e7in onay verilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131rsa, SGB IX 84. Madde 1. F\u0131kra uyar\u0131nca bir \u00f6nleme prosed\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn fesih i\u015flemini ancak \u015fu durumlarda \u00f6nleyebilece\u011fi varsay\u0131labilir: spesifik endikasyonlar. SGB \u200b\u200bIX Madde 85&#8217;e g\u00f6re, a\u011f\u0131r engelli bir ki\u015finin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan feshedilmesi, entegrasyon b\u00fcrosunun \u00f6nceden iznini gerektirir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700475195495{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]B\u00f6l\u00fcm 85 SGB IX uyar\u0131nca muvafakat gereklili\u011fi, yaln\u0131zca fesih bildirimi al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda zaten a\u011f\u0131r engelli oldu\u011fu kabul edilen veya fesih bildiriminin al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan en az \u00fc\u00e7 hafta \u00f6nce tan\u0131nma i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruda bulunan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara y\u00f6nelik i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karmalar\u0131 kapsar, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 90 Paragraf 2a SGB IX . 1 Mart 2007 (2 AZR 217\/06) tarihli karar\u0131nda, \u0130kinci Senato, SGB IX&#8217;un 90. Maddesi 2a F\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 2a paragraf\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yaln\u0131zca a\u011f\u0131r engelli ki\u015filer i\u00e7in de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda a\u015fa\u011f\u0131dakilere g\u00f6re e\u015fit muamele g\u00f6ren engelli ki\u015filer i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir: B\u00f6l\u00fcm 68 SGB IX ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700475216646{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Ayr\u0131ca, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmadan en az \u00fc\u00e7 hafta \u00f6nce f\u0131rsat e\u015fitli\u011fi ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmam\u0131\u015f olmalar\u0131 durumunda, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel korumadan da muaf tutuluyorlar. SGB \u200b\u200bIX Madde 90 Paragraf 2a F\u0131kra 2 Alt Alt uyar\u0131nca, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel koruma yaln\u0131zca SGB IX Madde 69 Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 2 C\u00fcmlesinde belirtilen \u00fc\u00e7 haftal\u0131k s\u00fcrenin, emekli maa\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan belirlenecek \u015fekilde fesih bildiriminin al\u0131nmas\u0131 \u00fczerine sona ermesi durumunda ge\u00e7erlidir. ofis (ya da Federal \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma Ajans\u0131) taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ve karar eksikli\u011fi ba\u015fvuru sahibinin i\u015fbirli\u011fi eksikli\u011finden kaynaklanmamaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvurunun fesih tarihinden en az \u00fc\u00e7 hafta \u00f6nce yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Madde 90 Paragraf 2a 2. Alternatif SGB IX b\u00f6ylece erken bir son tarih i\u00e7in bir h\u00fck\u00fcm te\u015fkil etmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700475228310{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bu ayn\u0131 zamanda SGB IX Madde 90 Paragraf 2a&#8217;n\u0131n, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel koruman\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek amac\u0131na da uygundur. 87 \u0130kinci Senato, 6 Eyl\u00fcl 2007 (2 AZR 324\/06) tarihli karar\u0131yla, SGB IX Madde 90 Paragraf 2a Paragraf 2a uyar\u0131nca a\u011f\u0131r engellilik kan\u0131t\u0131na ili\u015fkin i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ve Madde 90 Paragraf 2a 2. alternatif SGB IX&#8217;un zorunlu olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 90 Paragraf 2a SGB IX&#8217;un ilk alternatifinin bir k\u0131s\u0131tlamas\u0131 olarak anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Prensip olarak, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma s\u0131ras\u0131nda a\u011f\u0131r \u00f6z\u00fcrl\u00fc veya dengi ki\u015finin stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn kan\u0131tlanmamas\u0131 durumunda i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel koruma ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir (ilk alternatif).<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700475263302{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a, fesih bildiriminin al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan sonraki d\u00f6nemde tan\u0131ma prosed\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn her i\u015fleminin ge\u00e7erlili\u011fini yitirmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmez; yaln\u0131zca genellikle umutsuz olanlar\u0131n ge\u00e7erlili\u011fini yitirmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelir. h) \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n \u00f6zel fesih hakk\u0131 \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin sona ermesinden sonra i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 koruma talebinde bulunmu\u015fsa ve i\u015f mahkemesi, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin fesihle sona ermedi\u011fine karar verirse, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, Madde uyar\u0131nca \u015funlar\u0131 yapabilir: 12 KSchG, karar\u0131n yasal olarak ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 hale gelmesinden itibaren bir hafta i\u00e7inde ilgili \u015fikayette bulunun Eski i\u015fverene, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma korumas\u0131 s\u00fcreci s\u0131ras\u0131nda yeni bir i\u015f ili\u015fkisine girmi\u015fse, kendisiyle i\u015f ili\u015fkisini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmeyi reddetti\u011fini beyan edin. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato&#8217;nun 25 Ekim 2007 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (6 AZR 662\/06), \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma korumas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde serbest meslek sahibi olmas\u0131 durumunda bu \u00f6zel fesih hakk\u0131na sahip de\u011fildir. KSchG&#8217;nin 12. Maddesi, yasada planlanmam\u0131\u015f bir bo\u015fluk bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n serbest meslek sahibi olmas\u0131 durumunda benzer \u015fekilde uygulanmaz. Bu durumda, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 12 KSchG&#8217;ye uygun olarak yap\u0131lan beyan\u0131n genel olarak izin verilen bir sonraki tarihte (Madde 140 BGB) ola\u011fan bir fesih olarak yeniden yorumlanmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700475247536{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]\u00d6te yandan, SGB IX Madde 90 F\u0131kra 2a F\u0131kra 2 Alt Alt uyar\u0131nca, ba\u015fvurunun fesih bildiriminden fesih \u00f6ncesinde bir karar verilebilecek kadar erken yap\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel koruma, delil eksikli\u011fine ra\u011fmen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte kal\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuran\u0131n uygun i\u015fbirli\u011fi ile Madde 69 Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 2 SGB IX&#8217;un son teslim tarihi i\u00e7erisinde verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilirdi. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvurunun fesih tarihinden en az \u00fc\u00e7 hafta \u00f6nce yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Durum b\u00f6yleyse ve delil eksikli\u011fi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015fbirli\u011fi eksikli\u011finden kaynaklanm\u0131yorsa, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel koruma uygulan\u0131r. \u0130kinci Senato&#8217;nun 6 Eyl\u00fcl 2007 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re bu durum, fesih an\u0131nda emeklilik dairesinden hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f ve daha sonra kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olumsuz bir karar olmas\u0131 durumunda da ge\u00e7erlidir. Kanun bu davada SGB IX&#8217;un 90. Maddesinin 2a F\u0131kras\u0131nda i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel koruman\u0131n kaybedilmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmemektedir. Yasa koyucu, &#8220;i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel koruman\u0131n, genel olarak umutsuz bir tan\u0131ma prosed\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erli olma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131&#8221; d\u0131\u015flamak istedi.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row triangle_shape=&#8221;no&#8221;][vc_column][vc_column_text] Sonland\u0131rma [\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text] a) \u0130tiraz s\u00fcresi [\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700473847902{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, ba\u015fka nedenlerden dolay\u0131 i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lman\u0131n sosyal a\u00e7\u0131dan haks\u0131z veya yasal olarak etkisiz oldu\u011funu iddia etmek isterse, yaz\u0131l\u0131 i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karman\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 hafta i\u00e7inde i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin feshedilmedi\u011fini kan\u0131tlamak i\u00e7in i\u015f mahkemesine \u015fikayette bulunmal\u0131d\u0131r. i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karma, \u0130\u015ften \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya Kar\u015f\u0131 Koruma Yasas\u0131 (KSchG) 4. Maddesi.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1700473857838{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;}&#8221;]Bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, \u00fc\u00e7 hafta i\u00e7inde zaman\u0131nda i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 koruma talebinde bulunmu\u015fsa, KSchG&#8217;nin 6. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karman\u0131n etkisizli\u011fine ili\u015fkin hen\u00fcz ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmemi\u015f di\u011fer nedenleri de ileri s\u00fcrebilir. ilk etapta s\u00f6zl\u00fc duru\u015fman\u0131n sona ermesi. \u0130kinci Senato&#8217;nun 8 Kas\u0131m 2007&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10692,"parent":11641,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-13867","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.2 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-30T13:30:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@rasteinwachs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"27 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/canta-kararlari-2007\\\/sonlandirma\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/canta-kararlari-2007\\\/sonlandirma\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/canta-kararlari-2007\\\/sonlandirma\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/canta-kararlari-2007\\\/sonlandirma\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/11\\\/Bundesarbeitsgericht_Urteile_2007.webp?fit=200%2C100&quality=20&ssl=1\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-20T09:47:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-30T13:30:45+00:00\",\"description\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/canta-kararlari-2007\\\/sonlandirma\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/canta-kararlari-2007\\\/sonlandirma\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/canta-kararlari-2007\\\/sonlandirma\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/11\\\/Bundesarbeitsgericht_Urteile_2007.webp?fit=200%2C100&quality=20&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/11\\\/Bundesarbeitsgericht_Urteile_2007.webp?fit=200%2C100&quality=20&ssl=1\",\"width\":200,\"height\":100,\"caption\":\"Rechtliche Wirkung einer K\u00fcndigung\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/canta-kararlari-2007\\\/sonlandirma\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\u0130\u015f hukuku kararlar\u0131\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u00c7anta kararlar\u0131 2007\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/arbeitsrecht-urteile\\\/bag-urteile-2007\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Sonland\u0131rma\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"description\":\"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":[\"Organization\",\"Place\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"width\":174,\"height\":76,\"caption\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/rasteinwachs\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA\"],\"telephone\":[]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","og_description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","og_url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","article_modified_time":"2023-11-30T13:30:45+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@rasteinwachs","twitter_misc":{"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"27 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Bundesarbeitsgericht_Urteile_2007.webp?fit=200%2C100&quality=20&ssl=1","datePublished":"2023-11-20T09:47:49+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-30T13:30:45+00:00","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Bundesarbeitsgericht_Urteile_2007.webp?fit=200%2C100&quality=20&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Bundesarbeitsgericht_Urteile_2007.webp?fit=200%2C100&quality=20&ssl=1","width":200,"height":100,"caption":"Rechtliche Wirkung einer K\u00fcndigung"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/canta-kararlari-2007\/sonlandirma\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\u0130\u015f hukuku kararlar\u0131","item":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u00c7anta kararlar\u0131 2007","item":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/arbeitsrecht-urteile\/bag-urteile-2007\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Sonland\u0131rma"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":["Organization","Place"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","width":174,"height":76,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","https:\/\/x.com\/rasteinwachs","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA"],"telephone":[]}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13867","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13867"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13867\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11641"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10692"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13867"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}