{"id":13712,"date":"2023-11-20T09:18:08","date_gmt":"2023-11-20T08:18:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2006\/degistir\/"},"modified":"2023-11-30T02:57:49","modified_gmt":"2023-11-30T01:57:49","slug":"degistir","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2006\/degistir\/","title":{"rendered":"De\u011fi\u015ftir"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row triangle_shape=”no”][vc_column][vc_column_text]Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n 22 Kas\u0131m 2005 tarihli (C 144\/04 [Mangold]) karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Yedinci Senato, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 14. Madde uyar\u0131nca s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verdi. 3 C\u00fcmle 1 ve 4 TzBfG. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re, belirli s\u00fcreli i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte i\u015f\u00e7inin 52 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 doldurmu\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde, belirli s\u00fcreli i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi i\u00e7in objektif bir neden aranmamaktad\u0131r. Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131 22 Kas\u0131m 2005 tarihli karar\u0131nda 14. Maddenin 1. Paragraf\u0131n\u0131n uyumsuzlu\u011funu tespit etti. 3 C\u00fcmle 4 TzBfG Topluluk hukuku ile kurulmu\u015ftur. Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne g\u00f6re, 14. maddenin 1. paragraf\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen d\u00fczenleme; 3 C\u00fcmle 4 TzBfG’nin i\u015fverenlerin herhangi bir nesnel neden olmaks\u0131z\u0131n belirli s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler belirlemesi, do\u011frudan ya\u015fa dayal\u0131 e\u015fit olmayan muameleyi temsil etmektedir. \u0130\u015fsiz ya\u015fl\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7ilerin mesleki entegrasyonunu te\u015fvik etme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn izledi\u011fi hedefin, prensipte, ya\u015fa dayal\u0131 e\u015fitsiz muamelenin nesnel ve uygun bir gerek\u00e7esi olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011fi do\u011frudur. Ancak, ulusal d\u00fczenlemenin ilgili \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlama i\u00e7in tek kriter olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesi halinde, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ve sosyal politika alan\u0131ndaki hedeflerine ula\u015fmaya y\u00f6nelik tedbirleri se\u00e7erken \u00dcye Devletlere tan\u0131nan geni\u015f takdir yetkisi a\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olur. \u0130lgili i\u015fg\u00fcc\u00fc piyasas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131na ve ilgili ki\u015finin ki\u015fisel durumuna bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n, i\u015fsiz ya\u015fl\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7ilerin mesleki entegrasyonu i\u00e7in bir ya\u015f s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 belirlemenin gerekli oldu\u011fu kan\u0131tlanmad\u0131k\u00e7a i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi. Mit ihrem Inhalt gehe die Vorschrift des \u00a7 14 Abs. 3 C\u00fcmle 4 \u0130zlenen hedefe ula\u015fmak i\u00e7in uygun ve gerekli olan\u0131n \u00f6tesinde TzBfG. Bu nedenle 6. maddenin 1. paragraf\u0131 uyar\u0131nca kullan\u0131lamaz. 2000\/78\/EC say\u0131l\u0131 Direktifin 1. maddesi gerek\u00e7elendirilebilir. Direktifin uygulama s\u00fcresinin hen\u00fcz dolmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, haks\u0131z e\u015fitsiz muamele tespitine engel te\u015fkil etmemektedir. \u0130lk olarak, \u00dcye Devletlerin, bir direktifin i\u00e7 hukuka aktar\u0131lmas\u0131 d\u00f6neminde, direktifin hedefine ula\u015fmay\u0131 kendi mevzuatlar\u0131 yoluyla ciddi \u015fekilde sorgulamalar\u0131 pek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. \u0130kinci olarak, istihdamda ve meslekte e\u015fit muamele ilkesi yaln\u0131zca 2000\/78\/EC say\u0131l\u0131 Direktifte yer almamaktad\u0131r. Ya\u015fa dayal\u0131 ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131 Topluluk hukukunun genel bir ilkesi olarak kabul edilmelidir. Bu nedenle, ya\u015fa dayal\u0131 ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir anla\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n derdest oldu\u011fu ulusal mahkeme, kendi yarg\u0131 yetkisi s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 dahilinde, bireyin Topluluk hukukundan elde etti\u011fi yasal korumay\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u00f6nlemi alarak sa\u011flamaktan sorumludur. aksi takdirde ulusal hukukun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanamaz. Bu i\u00e7tihad\u0131 takiben, Yedinci Senato 26 Nisan 2006 (7 AZR 500\/04) tarihli karar\u0131nda B\u00f6l\u00fcm 14 Para. 3 C\u00fcmle 4 TzBfG ulusal mahkemeler taraf\u0131ndan uygulanamaz. Sonu\u00e7 olarak bu d\u00fczenlemeye dayal\u0131 bir s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131rlamas\u0131 etkisizdir. Ulusal mahkemeler, Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n uygulanamazl\u0131k karar\u0131na tabidir. Madde 234 para. AT 1 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar uyar\u0131nca, Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’na, di\u011fer hususlar\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, Avrupa Toplulu\u011funu kuran Antla\u015fma’n\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131 konusunda \u00dcye Devletlerin mahkemeleri ile ilgili olarak nihai karar verme yetkisi verilmi\u015ftir. \u00d6n karar usul\u00fc \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 karar verme yetkisi, Avrupa Birli\u011fi’nin r\u0131za kanunlar\u0131na g\u00f6re verilmektedir. Madde 23 paragraf. 1 C\u00fcmle 2, Madde 59 Para. 2 C\u00fcmle 1 GG aktar\u0131lan yeterlilikler. Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131, 14. maddenin 1. paragraf\u0131n\u0131n uygulanamaz oldu\u011funu tespit etti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde bu yetkileri a\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3 c\u00fcmle 4 TzBfG, Topluluk hukukunun genel ilkelerinden kaynaklanan ya\u015f ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yasa\u011f\u0131na dayan\u0131yordu. Yasak, 23. maddenin 23. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giriyor. Temel Kanunun 1 c\u00fcmle 2’si, 6. Maddenin 2. paragraf\u0131 uyar\u0131nca koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nan temel haklar\u0131n elde edilmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda. 2 Topluluk hukukunun genel ilkeleri olarak AB, asgari say\u0131da \u00dcye Devlete dayanmamal\u0131, bunun yerine bir \u00dcye Devlette veya yaln\u0131zca az say\u0131da \u00dcye Devlette a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a garanti alt\u0131na al\u0131nan temel haklar\u0131n korunmas\u0131na dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Yedinci Senato ayr\u0131ca, Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n direktiflerin \u00f6nceki etkisine dayanan gerek\u00e7esinin, bir direktifin uygulama d\u00f6neminde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren bir ulusal kanunun, i\u00e7eri\u011finin 249. maddede belirtilenlerle \u00e7eli\u015fmesi halinde uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na geldi\u011fi \u015feklinde anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm. 3 EC uyar\u0131nca, direktifin amac\u0131 ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131d\u0131r ve Topluluk hukukuna uygun olarak yorumlanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Yasal koruma olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olas\u0131 geni\u015fletilmesiyle birlikte Adalet Divan\u0131 da yarg\u0131 yetkisini a\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131, kendi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne g\u00f6re, 14. maddenin 1. paragraf\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erlili\u011fini de\u011ferlendirdi. 3 C\u00fcmle 4 TzBfG, bir tarafta s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye uymakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc \u00fcye devletler i\u00e7in direktifin amac\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 niteli\u011fine ili\u015fkin ilkeler ile \u00f6zel sekt\u00f6r aras\u0131nda 2000\/78\/EC say\u0131l\u0131 Direktifin do\u011frudan uygulanmamas\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki mevcut \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma bireylerde ise s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye uygunluk ilkesinin \u00f6ncelikli olmas\u0131 lehine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu ilke ve ondan t\u00fcretilen direktifler toplumun temel yasas\u0131n\u0131n bir par\u00e7as\u0131d\u0131r. Mahkeme 14. maddenin 1. paragraf\u0131n\u0131n uygulanamaz oldu\u011funu tespit etti\u011finden beri. 3 C\u00fcmle 4 TzBfG, karar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturmak i\u00e7in Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’na yeni bir itirazda bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131n ne izin verilebilir ne de gerekli oldu\u011funu gerekli a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131kla belirtmi\u015ftir. Ulusal bir d\u00fczenlemenin Topluluk hukuku kapsam\u0131ndaki e\u015fitlik ilkesini ihlal etmesi durumunda, ulusal mahkeme, yasama organ\u0131ndan \u00f6nceden y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmek veya beklemek zorunda kalmadan, ayr\u0131mc\u0131 bir ulusal h\u00fckm\u00fc ortadan kald\u0131rmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Federal Anayasa Mahkemesi, Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n temel haklar\u0131 genel e\u015fitlik ilkesi ve ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yapmama \u015fart\u0131 temelinde incelemesini onaylam\u0131\u015f ve bunu, ikincil Topluluk hukukunun uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 inceleme yetkisini geri \u00e7ekme f\u0131rsat\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. \u00a7 14 paragraf. 3 C\u00fcmle 4 TzBfG, Topluluk hukuku kapsam\u0131ndaki me\u015fru beklentilerin korunmas\u0131 nedeniyle 22 Kas\u0131m 2005’ten \u00f6nce yap\u0131lan sabit s\u00fcreli anla\u015fmalara da uygulanmaz. Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131, birincil Topluluk hukukunu ihlal eden bir ulusal standard\u0131n uygulanamazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin zaman s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlama yetkisine tek ba\u015f\u0131na sahiptir. Ancak bu, uygulanamazl\u0131k beyan\u0131n\u0131n zamansal etkilerini s\u0131n\u0131rlamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bir anla\u015fmazl\u0131k durumunda, Yedinci Senato, Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n uygulanamazl\u0131k karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan, me\u015fru beklentilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayarak uygulanamazl\u0131k karar\u0131n\u0131n zamansal etkisini s\u0131n\u0131rlamaya ulusal mahkemelerin yetkili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k b\u0131rakabildi. ulusal anayasa hukuku kapsam\u0131nda. Ulusal hukuk kapsam\u0131nda me\u015fru beklentilerin korunmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin gereklilikler, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 14 Paragraf 1 uyar\u0131nca ya\u015f s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131yla ilgilidir. 3 C\u00fcmle 4 TzBfG mevcut de\u011fil. Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn Topluluk hukuku ile uyumlulu\u011fu i\u015f hukuku literat\u00fcr\u00fcnde daha \u00f6nceden sorgulan\u0131yordu. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato, hayatta kalan e\u015fin, \u00f6len eski \u00e7al\u0131\u015fandan 15 ya\u015f daha gen\u00e7 olmas\u0131 durumunda, dul ve yetim maa\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 hari\u00e7 tutan bir emeklilik d\u00fczenlemesini de\u011ferlendirmek zorunda kald\u0131. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato, 27 Haziran 2006 (3 AZR 352\/05) tarihli karar\u0131yla Alman hukukunun, \u00f6zellikle de i\u015f hukuku kapsam\u0131nda e\u015fit muamele ilkesinin bu t\u00fcr bir d\u00fczenlemeyle \u00e7eli\u015fmedi\u011fine karar verdi. \u015eirket emeklilik planlar\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda, i\u015fveren bariz risk de\u011ferlendirmeleri nedeniyle performans riskini s\u0131n\u0131rlayabilir. Bu durum 15 ya\u015f s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131ndaki ya\u015f fark\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcnde de h\u00e2l\u00e2 ge\u00e7erlidir. Ancak Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n 22 Kas\u0131m 2005 tarihli karar\u0131 (C 144\/04 [Mangold]) nedeniyle, ya\u015f ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ilkesinin arka plan\u0131na dayan\u0131larak hukuki durumun farkl\u0131 \u015f \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi \u015f\u00fcphelidir. AT birincil hukukunda. Bu nedenle \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato, EC’nin 234. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 ask\u0131ya ald\u0131 ve Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’na \u00e7e\u015fitli sorular sundu. \u00d6ncelikle \u015firket emeklilik hukukunda ya\u015fa dayal\u0131 ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ulusal d\u00fczeyde etkisinin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Prensip olarak, AT birincil hukukuna dayanan temel haklar\u0131n uygulanabilirli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sorunun d\u00fczenlenmesi i\u00e7in Topluluk hukukuna at\u0131f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekiyorsa, bu soruya olumsuz yan\u0131t verilebilir. Topluluk hukukuna yap\u0131lan at\u0131f, Toplulu\u011fun di\u011fer \u015feylerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra ya\u015fa dayal\u0131 ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131kla m\u00fccadele etme yetkisine sahip oldu\u011funu belirten AT 13. Maddesinden ve \u00c7er\u00e7eve Direktifinden kaynaklanabilir. Yurti\u00e7i bir etkinin do\u011frulanabildi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde, bu etkinin bir yanda \u00f6zel i\u015fverenler ile di\u011fer yanda onlar\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 ya da \u015firket emeklileri ve bunlar\u0131n hayatta kalanlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda da geli\u015fip geli\u015fmedi\u011fi sorusu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Buna da olumlu yan\u0131t verilirse, do\u011frudan veya dolayl\u0131 ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k olarak ya\u015f fark\u0131 maddesinin ya\u015f ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131na girip girmedi\u011fi ve Topluluk hukukunun, sosyal yard\u0131mlarda fayda riskinin s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ulusal gerek\u00e7eyle \u00e7eli\u015fip \u00e7eli\u015fmedi\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 gerekir. ya\u015f fark\u0131 maddesinin \u015fekli. Ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n haks\u0131z oldu\u011funun varsay\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde Senato ayr\u0131ca bu yasa\u011f\u0131n geriye d\u00f6n\u00fck olarak s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z etkisinin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya ge\u00e7mi\u015fte s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7in uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekip gerekmedi\u011fini sordu.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no”][vc_column][vc_empty_space][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row triangle_shape=”no”][vc_column][vc_column_text]Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n 22 Kas\u0131m 2005 tarihli (C 144\/04 [Mangold]) karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Yedinci Senato, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 14. Madde uyar\u0131nca s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verdi. 3 C\u00fcmle 1 ve 4 TzBfG. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re, belirli s\u00fcreli i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte i\u015f\u00e7inin 52 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 doldurmu\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde, belirli s\u00fcreli i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi i\u00e7in objektif bir neden aranmamaktad\u0131r. Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131 22 Kas\u0131m 2005 tarihli karar\u0131nda 14. Maddenin 1. Paragraf\u0131n\u0131n uyumsuzlu\u011funu tespit etti. 3 C\u00fcmle 4 TzBfG Topluluk hukuku ile kurulmu\u015ftur. Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne g\u00f6re, 14. maddenin 1. paragraf\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen d\u00fczenleme; 3 C\u00fcmle 4 TzBfG’nin i\u015fverenlerin herhangi bir nesnel neden olmaks\u0131z\u0131n belirli s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":13703,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-13712","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nRechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2006\/degistir\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2006\/degistir\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-30T01:57:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@rasteinwachs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"8 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/bag-kararlari-2006\\\/degistir\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/bag-kararlari-2006\\\/degistir\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-20T08:18:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-30T01:57:49+00:00\",\"description\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/bag-kararlari-2006\\\/degistir\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/bag-kararlari-2006\\\/degistir\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/bag-kararlari-2006\\\/degistir\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\u0130\u015f hukuku kararlar\u0131\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"BAG kararlar\u0131 2006\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/bag-kararlari-2006\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"De\u011fi\u015ftir\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"description\":\"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":[\"Organization\",\"Place\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"width\":174,\"height\":76,\"caption\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/rasteinwachs\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA\"],\"telephone\":[]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2006\/degistir\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","og_description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","og_url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2006\/degistir\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","article_modified_time":"2023-11-30T01:57:49+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@rasteinwachs","twitter_misc":{"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"8 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2006\/degistir\/","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2006\/degistir\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-11-20T08:18:08+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-30T01:57:49+00:00","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2006\/degistir\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2006\/degistir\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2006\/degistir\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\u0130\u015f hukuku kararlar\u0131","item":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"BAG kararlar\u0131 2006","item":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2006\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"De\u011fi\u015ftir"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":["Organization","Place"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","width":174,"height":76,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","https:\/\/x.com\/rasteinwachs","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA"],"telephone":[]}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13712","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13712"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13712\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13703"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13712"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}