{"id":13162,"date":"2023-11-20T13:30:48","date_gmt":"2023-11-20T12:30:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/sonlandirma-2\/"},"modified":"2023-11-28T07:19:45","modified_gmt":"2023-11-28T06:19:45","slug":"sonlandirma-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2008\/sonlandirma-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Sonland\u0131rma"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1700483509651{padding-bottom: 40px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]a) Yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekil<\/strong><\/p>\n

Alman Medeni Kanunu’nun (BGB) 623. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen yaz\u0131l\u0131 fesih \u015fekli, s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131na orant\u0131l\u0131 hukuki kesinlik sa\u011flamay\u0131 ve davalarda delil sa\u011flamay\u0131 kolayla\u015ft\u0131rmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato’nun 24 Ocak 2008 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (6 AZR 519\/07), fesih bildiriminde el yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile imza bulunmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131, fesih bildiriminin sunulmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda ihra\u00e7\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n kimli\u011finin derhal belirlenmesini gerektirmez. yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyan. beyan\u0131n al\u0131c\u0131s\u0131na. Bu yaln\u0131zca tan\u0131mlanabilir olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu, ad\u0131n okunabilir olmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmez. \u0130htiya\u00e7 duyulan tek \u015fey, imza sahibinin kimli\u011fini yeterince tan\u0131mlayan ve taklidi zorla\u015ft\u0131ran bireysel ve buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelen \u00f6zellikleri sunan bir yaz\u0131d\u0131r. <\/p>\n

b) \u0130hbar s\u00fcreleri<\/strong><\/p>\n

Madde 622 F\u0131kra 4 F\u0131kra 2 C\u00fcmle BGB’ye g\u00f6re, toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde, burada \u00fczerinde mutabakata var\u0131lan ve Madde 622 F\u0131kra 1 ila 3 BGB’den farkl\u0131 olan h\u00fck\u00fcmler, uygulamalar\u0131n\u0131n taraflar aras\u0131nda kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde ge\u00e7erlidir. \u0130kinci Senato, Alman Medeni Kanunu’nun (BGB) 622. maddesinin 4. paragraf\u0131n\u0131n 1. c\u00fcmlesine g\u00f6re, tek tip ihbar s\u00fcreleri ve s\u00fcrelerine g\u00f6re mezuniyeti olmayan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck i\u015fletmeler i\u00e7in fesih tarihleri \u200b\u200b\u00f6ng\u00f6ren toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerin de kabul edilebilir olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermek zorundayd\u0131. . hizmet ve ya\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan. 23 Nisan 2008 tarihli bir kararla (2 AZR 21\/07), Senato bu soruyu olumlu yan\u0131tlad\u0131. Her durumda, toplu pazarl\u0131\u011f\u0131n taraflar\u0131, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck i\u015fletme \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 i\u00e7in bir takvim ay\u0131n\u0131n sonuna kadar alt\u0131 haftal\u0131k tek tip ihbar s\u00fcreleri \u00fczerinde anla\u015fabilirler. Yasa koyucunun ifadesine ve a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ifade etti\u011fi niyetine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak, genel yasal d\u00fczenlemenin daha y\u00fcksek bir amac\u0131n\u0131 veya modelini varsaymak ve dikkate almak kabul edilemez. Temel Kanun’un ne 3. maddesi ne de 12. maddesi, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck i\u015fletmelerde toplu ihbar s\u00fcrelerinin ya\u015fa veya hizmet s\u00fcresine g\u00f6re farkl\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rmemektedir. <\/p>\n

c) KSchG’nin uygulama kapsam\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n

17 Ocak 2008 (2 AZR 902\/06) tarihli karar\u0131nda, \u0130kinci Senato, Topluluk hukukunun \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine tabi olarak, \u0130\u015ften Korunma Yasas\u0131n\u0131n yaln\u0131zca B\u00f6l\u00fcm gereksinimlerini kar\u015f\u0131layan \u015firketler i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funu belirten ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulad\u0131. 23 Federal Almanya Cumhuriyeti topraklar\u0131nda Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 2 KSchG kar\u015f\u0131lanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu yorumda norm, Temel Kanun’un 3. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmemektedir. \u0130\u015ften \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lmay\u0131 Koruma Yasas\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u015firketin Federal Cumhuriyet merkezli olmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren yasal karar keyfi de\u011fildir. KSchG’nin 31 Aral\u0131k 2003 tarihine kadar ge\u00e7erli olan versiyonunda B\u00f6l\u00fcm 23 Paragraf 1 C\u00fcmle 2 ile a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lan daha \u00f6nceki \u0130kinci Senato i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re, Ge\u00e7erlilik i\u00e7in operasyonel gerekliliklerin sunulmas\u0131 ve kan\u0131tlanmas\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fc \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana aittir. \u0130\u015ften \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lmay\u0131 Koruma Kanunu. Senato, 26 Haziran 2008 (2 AZR 264\/07) tarihli karar\u0131nda, 1 Ocak 2004’te y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 23’\u00fcn yeni versiyonu i\u00e7in de bu i\u00e7tihada ba\u011fl\u0131 kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Senato ayn\u0131 zamanda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ibraz y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirmesi konusunda a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 taleplerde bulunulmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini do\u011frulad\u0131. Temel haklar\u0131n nesnel i\u00e7eri\u011fi, yani Temel Kanun’un 12. maddesi, usul hukukunda da \u00e7ok \u00f6nemlidir. Temel haklar\u0131n \u00f6nemi \u00f6zellikle ispat ve ibraz k\u00fclfetinin da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m\u0131na yans\u0131t\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fandan kendi bilgi eksikli\u011finden dolay\u0131 sa\u011flayamayaca\u011f\u0131 bilgilerin istenmemesine dikkat edilmelidir. Kendi bilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, i\u015fverenin ondan fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek ibraz y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131lamaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda, elindeki delilleri \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 tam olarak a\u00e7\u0131klamak i\u015fverene kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n bu konuda yorum yapmas\u0131 ve gerekirse kan\u0131t sunmas\u0131 gerekir. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n, i\u015fverenin iddia etti\u011fi ger\u00e7ekler hakk\u0131nda ki\u015fisel bilgisi yoksa, i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan sa\u011flanan delillere g\u00fcvenebilir ve kendisi taraf\u0131ndan bilinen, i\u015fverenin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n aksine e\u015fi\u011fe ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair delilleri sunabilir. ZPO’nun 139. maddesine g\u00f6re, \u00f6ncelikle delil sunmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olan ki\u015finin, rakibin belirtti\u011fi delili a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7\u0131rm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde, onu kullanma olana\u011f\u0131 konusunda mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan bilgilendirilmesi gerekmektedir. <\/p>\n

d) KSchG \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ola\u011fan fesih bildirimi<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130kinci Senato’nun yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re, fesih i\u00e7in operasyonel gereklilikler \u015fu anlamdad\u0131r: \u00a7 1 Paragraf 2 KSchG, i\u00e7 ko\u015fullardan (rasyonelle\u015ftirme \u00f6nlemleri, d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrme veya \u00fcretimin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 gibi giri\u015fimcilik kararlar\u0131) veya d\u0131\u015f nedenlerden (\u00f6rne\u011fin sipari\u015f eksikli\u011fi veya sat\u0131\u015flarda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fc\u015f) kaynaklan\u0131r. Bu operasyonel gereklilikler \u201cacil\u201d olmal\u0131 ve \u015firketin \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan fesih gerektirmelidir. Operasyonel durum nedeniyle fesih ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bir fesih i\u015fleminin yasall\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi i\u00e7in ilgili zaman, fesih i\u015fleminin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 zamand\u0131r. 13 \u015eubat 2008 (2 AZR 543\/06) tarihli bir karara g\u00f6re, ama\u00e7lanan bir operasyonel veya departmansal kapatma, istisnai durumlarda \u015fu anlamda acil bir operasyonel gereksinime d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015febilir: \u00a7 1 Paragraf 2 KSchG, e\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n gelecekte i\u015fini kaybetmesiyle ilgili geli\u015fmeler fesih tarihinde zaten kesinse. Bunu yapmak i\u00e7in, fesihle sonu\u00e7lanan organizasyonel karar\u0131n, fesih al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda nihai olarak verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve \u015firketin veya \u015firket departman\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin taraflar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan halihaz\u0131rda tan\u0131nabilir bi\u00e7imlerde al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. sonland\u0131rma. Bu nedenle, e\u011fer i\u015fveren kapatma karar\u0131n\u0131 yaln\u0131zca d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015fse ancak hen\u00fcz nihai olarak vermemi\u015fse, bir \u015firketin kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma sosyal a\u00e7\u0131dan hakl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmez. Ayn\u0131 durum, fesih s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015fverenin \u015firketin veya operasyon departman\u0131n\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 konusunda h\u00e2l\u00e2 ciddi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerde olmas\u0131 veya yeni sipari\u015fler almaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 durumunda da ge\u00e7erlidir. O halde hizmetten \u00e7\u0131karma konusunda ko\u015fulsuz ve nihai bir niyet yoktur. Yine de bir fesih verilirse, bu, etkisiz bir s\u00f6zde “fesih bildirimidir”. Bu ilkeler ayn\u0131 zamanda piyasaya kat\u0131lan kar amac\u0131 g\u00fctmeyen \u015firketler i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki anlamda fesih i\u00e7in operasyonel bir gereklili\u011fe yol a\u00e7an dahili ko\u015fullarla ilgili olarak: 13 Mart 2008 tarihli \u0130kinci Senato karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (2 AZR 1037\/06), KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 2, giri\u015fimcinin belirli g\u00f6revlerin art\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fil, gelecekte serbest \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki karar\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7ermektedir. Bu, giri\u015fim \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131na girer ve e\u011fer bir i\u015fveren, g\u00f6revleri art\u0131k kendi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131 kullanarak kendisi yerine getirmemeye, bunun yerine \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slara yapt\u0131rmaya karar verirse, istismar niteli\u011finde de\u011fildir. Kanun, piyasa kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 hizmet ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 yaln\u0131zca i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri yoluyla kar\u015f\u0131lamaya zorlamamaktad\u0131r. Bunun yerine yasal olarak izin verilen herhangi bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc kullanabilir. Fesih i\u015fleminin etkili olabilmesinin \u00f6n ko\u015fulu, yeni s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayal\u0131 ili\u015fkilerin sadece g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcrde serbest \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma olmay\u0131p ger\u00e7ekte de olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Senato, davac\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131 reddetti \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc Eyalet \u0130\u015f Mahkemesinin bulgular\u0131na g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren asl\u0131nda bir “sivrisinek sald\u0131rgan\u0131”n\u0131n (kontrol dolaplar\u0131na reklam posterleri yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmak) g\u00f6revlerini gelecekte serbest \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara yapt\u0131rmaya karar vermi\u015fti. \u0130kinci Senato’nun 23 Nisan 2008 tarihli karar\u0131 (2 AZR 1110\/06) ayn\u0131 zamanda i\u015f organizasyonunun faaliyetleri d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan temin etme karar\u0131na da dayan\u0131yordu. \u0130\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n istihdam se\u00e7eneklerini etkileyen bu t\u00fcr bir karar\u0131n, hukuki gerek\u00e7esi veya yerindeli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan incelenmesine gerek yoktur; yaln\u0131zca a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a objektif, mant\u0131ks\u0131z veya keyfi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan incelenmesi gerekir. Al\u0131nan ve fiilen uygulanan bir ticari organizasyon karar\u0131, bu karar\u0131n nesnel nedenlerle verildi\u011fi ve kanunun suiistimal edilmedi\u011fi varsay\u0131m\u0131na dayan\u0131r. <\/p>\n

Bu nedenle, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma korumas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n genel olarak, al\u0131nan i\u00e7 yap\u0131sal \u00f6nlemin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a nesnel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, mant\u0131ks\u0131z veya keyfi oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in istismar edici oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klamal\u0131 ve bir anla\u015fmazl\u0131k durumunda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 gereken ko\u015fullar\u0131 kan\u0131tlamal\u0131d\u0131r. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde Senato, \u00f6rne\u011fin istihdam ihtiyac\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fmeden, fiili i\u015f s\u00fcre\u00e7lerini terk ederek, ayr\u0131 \u015firket organizasyon yap\u0131lar\u0131 olu\u015fturularak bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 \u015firketten \u00e7\u0131karmaya zorlaman\u0131n suistimal te\u015fkil etti\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekti. hiyerar\u015fik talimatlara dokunulmaz ve yaln\u0131zca belirli bir dereceye kadar proforma, yaln\u0131zca bu ama\u00e7 i\u00e7in tasarlanm\u0131\u015f yasal yap\u0131lara uyarlan\u0131r. \u0130kinci Senato’nun yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na g\u00f6re i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 koruma \u015firketle ilgili de\u011fildir. Operasyonel nedenlerden dolay\u0131 i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce, i\u015fverenin genellikle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 ba\u015fka bir \u015firketin \u015firketine yerle\u015ftirme zorunlulu\u011fu yoktur. Ancak istisnai durumlarda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam etme konusunda grupla ilgili bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck de s\u00f6z konusu olabilir. Bu, \u00f6rne\u011fin ba\u015fka bir grup \u015firketinin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 almay\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kabul etmesi durumunda ve \u00f6zellikle b\u00f6yle bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn do\u011frudan i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden veya ba\u015fka bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayal\u0131 anla\u015fmadan veya ge\u00e7mi\u015f uygulamalardan kaynaklanmas\u0131 durumunda ge\u00e7erlidir. \u015eirketler aras\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam etme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn bir di\u011fer \u00f6n ko\u015fulu, \u00f6nceki i\u015fverenin \u201ctransfer\u201d \u00fczerinde belirleyici etkisinin olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bir hissedar\u0131n gruptaki birka\u00e7 veya t\u00fcm \u015firketler \u00fczerinde \u00f6nemli n\u00fcfuz sahibi olabilmesi, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 koruman\u0131n istisnai olarak grubu da kapsayacak \u015fekilde geni\u015fletildi\u011fini varsaymak i\u00e7in yeterli de\u011fildir. Bir belediyenin gelecekte e\u015fit f\u0131rsatlar sorumlusu g\u00f6revini bir g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fcye devretme se\u00e7ene\u011fini kullanmas\u0131 durumunda, daha \u00f6nce tam zamanl\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olan e\u015fit f\u0131rsatlar g\u00f6revlisi ile i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin acilen operasyonel olarak sona erdirilmesine y\u00f6nelik bir gereklilik bulunmaktad\u0131r. Federal \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi 18 Eyl\u00fcl 2008 tarihli karar\u0131nda (2 AZR 560\/07) bu karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. \u015eirket de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi nedeniyle i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma durumunda, i\u015fveren ile i\u015f konseyi aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n uzla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 yoluyla i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lacak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n isimleri belirlenirse, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n sosyal se\u00e7imi yaln\u0131zca b\u00fcy\u00fck hatalar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kontrol edilebilir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 5 C\u00fcmle 2 KSchG uyar\u0131nca. A\u00e7\u0131k, bariz, ciddi bir hata varsa ve \u00e7\u0131karlar dengesinde herhangi bir denge yoksa, sosyal se\u00e7ilim b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kusurludur. Bu, objektif yorumlama sonucuna ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. 17 Ocak 2008 tarihinde karara ba\u011flanan davada (2 AZR 405\/06), davac\u0131n\u0131n sosyal verileri ile i\u015fine son verilmeyen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan aras\u0131ndaki farklar sadece marjinal d\u00fczeydeydi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u201cbr\u00fct\u201d bir sapma yoktu. \u0130\u015fverenin sosyal yard\u0131mlar\u0131 se\u00e7erken gelir vergisi kart\u0131ndaki giri\u015flere g\u00fcvenip g\u00fcvenemeyece\u011fi sorusu a\u00e7\u0131k kalabilir. Ancak \u0130kinci Senato karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde KSchG’nin 1. Maddesinin 3. F\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 1. C\u00fcmlesine g\u00f6re aile hukuku kapsam\u0131ndaki nafaka y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine i\u015faret etti. Gelir vergisi kart\u0131ndaki \u00e7ocukla ilgili giri\u015fler, bu aile hukuku ili\u015fkilerinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda yaln\u0131zca s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 bir miktar s\u00f6yledi\u011finden, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 3 C\u00fcmle 1 KSchG’nin gelir vergisi kart\u0131na girilen \u00e7ocuk yard\u0131mlar\u0131na at\u0131fta bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. daha ziyade ger\u00e7ek verilere. \u0130\u015fverenin, do\u011fru olamayaca\u011f\u0131na inanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bir nedeni yoksa, kendisi taraf\u0131ndan bilinen verilere g\u00fcvenebilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, uygulaman\u0131n ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 yeterince dikkate al\u0131nmaktad\u0131r. <\/p>\n

\u0130kinci Senato, 6 Kas\u0131m 2008 (2 AZR 701\/07) tarihli karar\u0131nda, Genel E\u015fit Muamele Kanunu’ndaki (\u00a7\u00a7 1 10 AGG) ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasaklar\u0131n\u0131n, S\u00f6zle\u015fme uyar\u0131nca i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 koruma \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya koymu\u015ftur. \u0130\u015ften \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lmay\u0131 Koruma Yasas\u0131. Ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden bir fesih bu nedenle sosyal olarak dostane olmayan ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla etkisiz olabilir (\u00a7 1 KSchG). Ya\u015f ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yasa\u011f\u0131 (Madde 1, 10 AGG), sosyal se\u00e7ilim ba\u011flam\u0131nda ya\u015f\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemez (B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 3 C\u00fcmle 1 KSchG). Sosyal se\u00e7ilimde ya\u015f gruplar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fumuna (B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraf 3 C\u00fcmle 2 KSchG) AGG kapsam\u0131nda da izin verilmektedir. Her ne kadar genellikle kusur gerekli olsa da, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinden kaynaklanan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak ihlali, davran\u0131\u015f nedeniyle fesih nedeni olarak \u00f6zellikle uygundur; Performans\u0131n bozulmas\u0131ndan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan sorumlu olmal\u0131d\u0131r. G\u00f6rev ihlaline dayal\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck performans da i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmay\u0131 hakl\u0131 g\u00f6sterebilir. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan, ki\u015fisel performans\u0131na uygun \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bir hizmetin k\u00f6t\u00fc performans olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyece\u011fi taraflar aras\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayal\u0131 anla\u015fmalarla belirlenir. Genellikle oldu\u011fu gibi i\u015fin niceli\u011fi ve niteli\u011fi s\u00f6zle\u015fmede daha ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak belirtilmemi\u015fse, ifa vaadinin i\u00e7eri\u011fi i\u015fverenin y\u00f6nlendirme hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmak suretiyle belirleyece\u011fi i\u015f i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re belirlenir. ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ki\u015fisel, \u00f6znel performans\u0131. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan yapmas\u0131 gerekeni yapmal\u0131 ve elinden geldi\u011fince yapmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirip getirmedi\u011fi i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan her zaman objektif kriterlere g\u00f6re belirlenememektedir. Bu hususta kademeli ibraz y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kurallar\u0131 uygulan\u0131r. \u0130kinci Senato 17 Ocak 2008 tarihli karar\u0131nda (2 AZR 536\/06) bunu bir kez daha vurgulad\u0131. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck kaliteli performans\u0131 nedeniyle fesih durumunda, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n kusurlu i\u015f performans\u0131n\u0131n hata say\u0131s\u0131, t\u00fcr\u00fc ve ciddiyeti ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bildiklerini sunmak \u00f6ncelikle i\u015fverene kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130\u015fveren, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n uzun vadede kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131labilir i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan t\u00fcm \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n ortalama hata s\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterebilirse, bu, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini k\u0131nanacak \u015fekilde ihlal etti\u011finin bir g\u00f6stergesi olabilir. Ancak, ortalama hata oranlar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, performans ve \u00fccret aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkinin, i\u015fine son verilen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n hatal\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle ciddi \u015fekilde bozulup bozulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda tek ba\u015f\u0131na yeterli bilgi sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, i\u015fverenin bu duruma ili\u015fkin daha fazla kan\u0131t sunmas\u0131 gerekir. Ger\u00e7ek hata say\u0131s\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n hatal\u0131 i\u015f performans\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcr\u00fc, ciddiyeti ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na dayanarak, genel ko\u015fullara dayal\u0131 ortalama hata oranlar\u0131n\u0131n uzun vadede \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n hatal\u0131 i\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterdi\u011finin daha ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak ortaya konmas\u0131 gerekir. S\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini k\u0131nanacak \u015fekilde ihlal ediyor. E\u011fer i\u015fveren bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te bunu a\u00e7\u0131klarsa, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan ortalaman\u0131n \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde alt\u0131nda performans g\u00f6stermesine ra\u011fmen neden en iyi performans\u0131 g\u00f6sterebildi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klamal\u0131d\u0131r. <\/p>\n

e) Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc fesih<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130kinci Senato’nun yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re, yaln\u0131zca kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme ihlali de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda bir su\u00e7 eylemi veya ba\u015fka bir suiistimal konusunda ciddi \u015f\u00fcpheler de ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc fesih i\u00e7in \u00f6nemli bir neden olu\u015fturabilir. \u015e\u00fcpheye dayal\u0131 fesih, i\u015fverenin (kan\u0131tlanmam\u0131\u015f) su\u00e7 veya s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayal\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f \u015f\u00fcphesinin i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin devam\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli g\u00fcveni yok etti\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek fesih i\u015flemini hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karmas\u0131 halinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir. G\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc \u015f\u00fcphelerin nesnel ger\u00e7eklere dayanmas\u0131, bu \u015f\u00fcphelerin i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin devam\u0131 i\u00e7in gereken g\u00fcveni yok etme ihtimalinin olmas\u0131 ve i\u015fverenin, \u00f6zellikle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana bilgi vermek \u00fczere ger\u00e7ekleri a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturmak i\u00e7in t\u00fcm makul \u00e7abay\u0131 g\u00f6stermesi durumunda \u015f\u00fcphe \u00fczerine fesih yap\u0131labilir. f\u0131rsat bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapt\u0131. \u0130kinci Senato, 13 Mart 2008 tarihli kararda (2 AZR 961\/06) fesih duyurulmadan \u00f6nce \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n d\u00fczg\u00fcn bir \u015fekilde dinlenmesi i\u00e7in gereklilikleri ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak ele ald\u0131. Ger\u00e7eklerin gerekli \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n dinlenmesi gerekir. Kapsamlar\u0131 bireysel davan\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Duru\u015fman\u0131n somut bir konuyla ilgili olmas\u0131 gerekir. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n, zaman ve mekanla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 baz\u0131 ger\u00e7eklere itiraz etme veya \u015f\u00fcpheyi ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131lan ger\u00e7ekleri belirtme f\u0131rsat\u0131na sahip olmas\u0131 ve b\u00f6ylece i\u015fveren a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan karanl\u0131kta kalan olaylar\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131na katk\u0131da bulunmas\u0131 gerekir. Senato karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde, yaln\u0131zca bu a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in i\u015fverenin dinlenmesinin gerekli oldu\u011funu vurguluyor. \u00d6te yandan, usuli bir komplikasyon olarak a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n geciktirilmesi ve ger\u00e7e\u011fin karart\u0131lmas\u0131 da ama\u00e7lanmamaktad\u0131r. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n kendisine y\u00f6nelik iddialara yan\u0131t vermeye ya da elinden gelenin en iyisini yaparak a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturmaya katk\u0131da bulunmaya ba\u015f\u0131ndan beri haz\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 olmamas\u0131 halinde, dinlenme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kusurlu bir ihlali s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n derhal su\u00e7lama hakk\u0131nda yorum yapmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmesi ve reddine ili\u015fkin herhangi bir gerek\u00e7e sunmamas\u0131 halinde, i\u015fverenin duru\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana \u015f\u00fcpheler hakk\u0131nda daha ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bilgi vermesine gerek yoktur. Duru\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n belirli ger\u00e7eklere ili\u015fkin bilgisi \u00f6nemliyse, yetkili temsilcinin bilgisi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana atfedilemez. \u015e\u00fcpheli i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karma yap\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce i\u015f\u00e7inin dinlenmesi, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana, kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 var olan \u015f\u00fcpheyi \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctme f\u0131rsat\u0131 vermek amac\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131r. Bu ancak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n kendisine y\u00f6neltilen iddialar hakk\u0131nda ki\u015fisel bilgiye sahip olmas\u0131 durumunda m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Temsil medeni hukukunun uygulanmas\u0131 bir se\u00e7enek de\u011fildir. <\/p>\n

f) De\u011fi\u015fiklik bildirimi<\/strong><\/p>\n

Fesih de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi durumunda, de\u011fi\u015fiklik teklifinin yaln\u0131zca faaliyeti (i\u015f yapma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc) de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda bedeli (\u00fccret) de de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi ama\u00e7lan\u0131yorsa, de\u011fi\u015fiklik teklifinin her iki unsuru da ilkeye g\u00f6re \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclmelidir. orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k. De\u011fi\u015ftirilen faaliyete ili\u015fkin \u00fccret miktar\u0131, otomatik olarak toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden veya i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan \u00fccret d\u00fczenlemesinden kaynaklanm\u0131yorsa ve bunun yerine i\u015fveren, benzer t\u00fcm \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n maa\u015flar\u0131 \u00fczerinde serbest\u00e7e pazarl\u0131k yapm\u0131\u015fsa, bu durumun ilkelere uygun olarak incelenmesi gerekir. Kademeli ibraz ve durumun b\u00f6yle olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispat y\u00fck\u00fc \u00c7al\u0131\u015fana \u00f6zel olarak teklif edilen \u00fccret, onun de\u011fi\u015fikliklere kar\u015f\u0131 korunmas\u0131n\u0131 yeterli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde dikkate al\u0131r. \u0130\u015fveren, de\u011fi\u015fiklik bildirimi yoluyla etkilenen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana benzer faaliyetler i\u00e7in \u00f6denen en y\u00fcksek \u00fccreti teklif etmek zorunda de\u011fildir. Bu, \u0130kinci Senato’nun 3 Nisan 2008 tarihli karar\u0131nda (2 AZR 500\/06) karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130\u015fverenin, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 yaln\u0131zca, de\u011fi\u015fikliklere kar\u015f\u0131 korumas\u0131n\u0131 dikkate alarak serbest\u00e7e m\u00fczakere edilen \u00fccret yap\u0131s\u0131na yerle\u015ftirmesi gerekir. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fana \u00f6denen ortalama \u00fccretin belirgin \u015fekilde alt\u0131nda bir \u00fccret teklif ederse, di\u011fer hangi hususlar\u0131n onu bu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck \u00fccreti belirlemeye y\u00f6neltti\u011fini ve de\u011fi\u015fikliklere kar\u015f\u0131 mevcut koruman\u0131n ne \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde yeterince dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamal\u0131d\u0131r. Teklif edilen \u00fccretin di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara g\u00f6re \u00fcst aral\u0131kta olmas\u0131 durumunda, ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta teklif edilen \u00fccretin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan taraf\u0131ndan makul bir \u015fekilde kabul edilebilece\u011fine dair bir varsay\u0131m vard\u0131r. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n daha sonra, de\u011fi\u015fikliklere kar\u015f\u0131 korunmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, de\u011fi\u015ftirilen faaliyeti i\u00e7in daha y\u00fcksek \u00fccret gerektiren di\u011fer hususlar\u0131 sunmas\u0131 gerekir. <\/p>\n

g) A\u011f\u0131r engelli ki\u015filerin i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel koruma<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130\u015fveren, a\u011f\u0131r engelli bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015fine son verirse, kendisinin a\u011f\u0131r engelli oldu\u011funu bilerek, bu durum ayn\u0131 zamanda engellili\u011fin bariz niteli\u011fine de dayanabilir ve \u00f6nce Entegrasyon Ofisi’nden B\u00f6l\u00fcm 85 SGB IX uyar\u0131nca fesih i\u00e7in gerekli izni almadan i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131l\u0131rsa , \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, mahkemede fesih hakk\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131ra kadar etkisiz oldu\u011funu iddia edebilir. 13 \u015eubat 2008 tarihli \u0130kinci Senato karar\u0131na (2 AZR 864\/06) g\u00f6re, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 C\u00fcmle 4 KSchG uyar\u0131nca, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 C\u00fcmle 1 KSchG uyar\u0131nca \u00fc\u00e7 haftal\u0131k ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi yaln\u0131zca Bu gibi durumlarda yetkilinin karar\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana verilir. E\u011fer i\u015fveren, fesih verildi\u011finde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ciddi sakatl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan veya e\u015fit stat\u00fcs\u00fcnden haberdar de\u011filse ve bu nedenle Entegrasyon B\u00fcrosunun onay\u0131na ba\u015fvurmam\u0131\u015fsa, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n fesih tarihinden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 hafta i\u00e7inde bu durumu s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmek i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruda bulunmas\u0131 gerekir. SGB \u200b\u200bIX Madde 85 uyar\u0131nca i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel korumas\u0131 \u0130\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel korumaya ba\u015fvurulur. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan, i\u015fverene a\u011f\u0131r engelli durumu veya e\u015fit durumu hakk\u0131nda zaman\u0131nda bilgi vermezse, art\u0131k i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel korumaya g\u00fcvenemez ve KSchG Madde 4 C\u00fcmle 1 uyar\u0131nca dava a\u00e7mak i\u00e7in son tarih sona erdi\u011finde , Alman Medeni Kanununun 134. Maddesi ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak 134. Maddesine g\u00f6re fiili ge\u00e7ersizlik nedeni. \u00a7 85 SGB IX, \u00a7 7 KSchG nedeniyle iyile\u015fti. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 C\u00fcmle 4 KSchG, bir karar\u0131n gerekli olmamas\u0131 ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana duyurulamamas\u0131 nedeniyle ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir. Ayn\u0131 durum, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n, i\u015f akdinin feshinden sonraki \u00fc\u00e7 hafta i\u00e7inde a\u011f\u0131r engelli durumunu veya e\u015fit stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc i\u015fverene bildirmesi durumunda da ge\u00e7erlidir. Bu durumda i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel korumaya g\u00fcvenebilir, ancak ayn\u0131 zamanda KSchG B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 C\u00fcmle 1’deki dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresine de uymak zorundad\u0131r, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc fesih bildiriminin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte i\u015fveren bunun fark\u0131nda de\u011fildi. \u0130\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel koruma ve r\u0131za i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruda bulunulamad\u0131.<\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1700483509651{padding-bottom: 40px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]a) Yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekil Alman Medeni Kanunu’nun (BGB) 623. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen yaz\u0131l\u0131 fesih \u015fekli, s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131na orant\u0131l\u0131 hukuki kesinlik sa\u011flamay\u0131 ve davalarda delil sa\u011flamay\u0131 kolayla\u015ft\u0131rmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato’nun 24 Ocak 2008 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (6 AZR 519\/07), fesih bildiriminde el yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile imza bulunmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131, fesih bildiriminin sunulmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda ihra\u00e7\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n kimli\u011finin derhal belirlenmesini gerektirmez. yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyan. beyan\u0131n al\u0131c\u0131s\u0131na. Bu yaln\u0131zca tan\u0131mlanabilir olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu, ad\u0131n okunabilir olmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmez. \u0130htiya\u00e7 duyulan tek \u015fey, imza sahibinin kimli\u011fini yeterince tan\u0131mlayan ve taklidi zorla\u015ft\u0131ran bireysel ve buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelen \u00f6zellikleri sunan bir yaz\u0131d\u0131r. b) \u0130hbar s\u00fcreleri Madde 622 F\u0131kra 4 F\u0131kra 2…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":13293,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-13162","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nRechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2008\/sonlandirma-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2008\/sonlandirma-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-28T06:19:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@rasteinwachs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"19 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/bag-kararlari-2008\\\/sonlandirma-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/bag-kararlari-2008\\\/sonlandirma-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-20T12:30:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-28T06:19:45+00:00\",\"description\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/bag-kararlari-2008\\\/sonlandirma-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/bag-kararlari-2008\\\/sonlandirma-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/bag-kararlari-2008\\\/sonlandirma-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\u0130\u015f hukuku kararlar\u0131\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"BAG kararlar\u0131 2008\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/bag-kararlari-2008\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Sonland\u0131rma\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"description\":\"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":[\"Organization\",\"Place\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"width\":174,\"height\":76,\"caption\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/rasteinwachs\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA\"],\"telephone\":[]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2008\/sonlandirma-2\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","og_description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","og_url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2008\/sonlandirma-2\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","article_modified_time":"2023-11-28T06:19:45+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@rasteinwachs","twitter_misc":{"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"19 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2008\/sonlandirma-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2008\/sonlandirma-2\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-11-20T12:30:48+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-28T06:19:45+00:00","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2008\/sonlandirma-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2008\/sonlandirma-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2008\/sonlandirma-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\u0130\u015f hukuku kararlar\u0131","item":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"BAG kararlar\u0131 2008","item":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/bag-kararlari-2008\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Sonland\u0131rma"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":["Organization","Place"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","width":174,"height":76,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","https:\/\/x.com\/rasteinwachs","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA"],"telephone":[]}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13162"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13162\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13293"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}