{"id":13033,"date":"2023-11-20T07:39:18","date_gmt":"2023-11-20T06:39:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\/"},"modified":"2023-11-27T12:52:31","modified_gmt":"2023-11-27T11:52:31","slug":"anayasa-hukuku-calisir","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\/","title":{"rendered":"Anayasa hukuku \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131r"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row triangle_shape=”no”][vc_column][vc_column_text]1. \u0130\u015f konseyi se\u00e7imi<\/strong>
\nB\u00f6l\u00fcm 19 Paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re. 1 BetrVG, oy verme hakk\u0131, uygunluk veya se\u00e7im prosed\u00fcr\u00fcne ili\u015fkin temel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ihlal edilmesi ve ihlalin se\u00e7im sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirmemesi veya etkilememesi durumunda herhangi bir d\u00fczeltme yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 durumunda, bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma konseyi se\u00e7imine itiraz edilebilir.<\/p>\n

Yedinci Senato, 13 Ekim 2004 tarihli karar\u0131yla (- 7 ABR 5\/04 -) B\u00f6l\u00fcm 2 Para. 5 11 Aral\u0131k 2001 (WO) tarihli versiyondaki se\u00e7im d\u00fczenlemeleri, \u015fu anlamda se\u00e7im prosed\u00fcr\u00fcne ili\u015fkin temel bir d\u00fczenlemedir: \u00a7 19 paragraf. 1 BetrVG’dir. Bu y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe g\u00f6re se\u00e7im kurulu, i\u015f konseyi se\u00e7imine ba\u015flanmadan \u00f6nce Almanca bilmeyen yabanc\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n se\u00e7im s\u00fcreci, se\u00e7men ve aday listelerinin haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131, se\u00e7im s\u00fcreci ve oy kullanma konular\u0131nda uygun \u015fekilde bilgilendirilmesini sa\u011flamal\u0131d\u0131r. Se\u00e7im s\u00fcrecine ili\u015fkin esasl\u0131 bir d\u00fczenleme olarak s\u0131n\u0131fland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, hedef d\u00fczenleme olarak tasarlanmas\u0131yla \u00e7eli\u015fmemektedir. D\u00fczenleme, aktif ve pasif oy haklar\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131yor ve yabanc\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n operasyonel entegrasyonuna hizmet ediyor. Bu bak\u0131mdan temel demokrasi ilkesinin hayata ge\u00e7irilmesini ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r.
\nse\u00e7im e\u015fitli\u011fi. Yedinci Senato ayr\u0131ca \u015firkette istihdam edilen yabanc\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n Almanca konu\u015fup konu\u015fmad\u0131klar\u0131 sorusunu de\u011ferlendirirken \u015funa karar verdi: \u00a7 2 para. 5 NEREDE g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc, \u00f6nemli olan Almanca bilgilerinin se\u00e7im y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin ve se\u00e7im duyurusunun i\u00e7eri\u011fini anlayabilecek kadar yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Yedinci Senato, 16 Mart 2005 tarihli karar\u0131yla (- 7 ABR 40\/04 -) B\u00f6l\u00fcm 15 Para. 2 BetrVG ve B\u00f6l\u00fcm 15 Para. 5 No. 2 C\u00fcmle 1 NEREDE
\n\u0130\u015f konseyi se\u00e7imlerinde cinsiyet kotas\u0131 anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. \u00a7 15 paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re. 2 BetrVG, i\u015fg\u00fcc\u00fcnde az\u0131nl\u0131kta olan cinsiyetin, en az \u00fc\u00e7 \u00fcyeden olu\u015fmas\u0131 halinde i\u015f konseyinde en az say\u0131sal oran\u0131 oran\u0131nda temsil edilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu d\u00fczenleme, memurlar\u0131n i\u015f konseyine se\u00e7ildiklerinde genellikle kendi gruplar\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturmalar\u0131 ve ilgili grup i\u00e7indeki az\u0131nl\u0131kta yer alan cinsiyetin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma konseyinde en az\u0131ndan orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak temsil edilmesi ko\u015fuluyla Deutsche Post’un halef \u015firketlerinde ge\u00e7erlidir. gruptaki say\u0131sal oranlar\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131 gerekir. \u00d6neri listelerinde yer alan azami say\u0131daki az\u0131nl\u0131kta ayn\u0131 cinsiyetten gerekli say\u0131da \u00fcyenin bulunmamas\u0131 halinde, 15. maddenin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca; \u00d6neri listesindeki yerine 5 No. 1 WO
\nAz\u0131nl\u0131k cinsiyetine ait olmayan en d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck maksimum ki\u015fi say\u0131s\u0131, ayn\u0131 teklif listesinde kendi adlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan az\u0131nl\u0131k cinsiyetinden olan ve dikkate al\u0131nmayan ve dikkate al\u0131nmayan ki\u015fi. Bu \u00f6neri listesinde cinsiyet az\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131na mensup bir ki\u015fi yer alm\u0131yorsa, bu i\u015f konseyi koltu\u011fu B\u00f6l\u00fcm 15 Paragraf\u0131na uygun olarak kullan\u0131lacakt\u0131r. 5 No. 2 C\u00fcmle 1 WO teklif listesinde, hen\u00fcz dikkate al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f olan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki azami say\u0131 ve az\u0131nl\u0131kta ayn\u0131 cinsiyetten \u00fcyeler bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu d\u00fczenlemeler, 3. Maddenin 1. F\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine orant\u0131s\u0131z bir m\u00fcdahaleye yol a\u00e7mamaktad\u0131r. 1 GG e\u015fit oy hakk\u0131 ilkesini takip etmektedir. Oylar ayn\u0131 ba\u015far\u0131 de\u011ferine sahip olamayabilece\u011finden ve az\u0131nl\u0131ktaki cinsiyetten ba\u015fvurana, \u00e7o\u011funluktaki cinsiyetten daha fazla oy alan ba\u015fvurana g\u00f6re \u00f6ncelik verilebilece\u011finden, bunlar hem aktif hem de pasif oy kullanma haklar\u0131na m\u00fcdahaleye yol a\u00e7abilir. oylar\u0131n kabul edilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

Ancak e\u015fit oy hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan bu m\u00fcdahale, 3. Maddenin f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki e\u015fit haklar gere\u011fi yasakt\u0131r. 2 GG hakl\u0131. Bu gereklilik, yasama organ\u0131na, genellikle kad\u0131nlar\u0131 etkileyen fiili dezavantajlar\u0131 uygun d\u00fczenlemeler yoluyla telafi etme yetkisi vermektedir. \u00a7 15 Abs. 2 BetrVG ve B\u00f6l\u00fcm 15 Para. 5 No. 2 C\u00fcmle 1 WO, kad\u0131nlar\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma konseyinde genellikle yetersiz temsil edildi\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, kad\u0131nlar ve erkekler aras\u0131ndaki e\u015fitli\u011fi fiilen g\u00fc\u00e7lendirmeye hizmet etmektedir. D\u00fczenlemeler Madde 9 Paragraf h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini ihlal ediyor. 3 GG \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc garanti etmedi. Her ne kadar B\u00f6l\u00fcm 15 Paragrafta yer alsa da. 5 No. 2 C\u00fcmle 1 NEREDE emredilen s\u00f6zde liste atlamalar\u0131, aday listelerinde az\u0131nl\u0131ktaki cinsiyetten yeterli say\u0131da aday bulunmayan i\u015f konseyi se\u00e7imlerindeki sendikalar\u0131n rekabet \u015fans\u0131n\u0131 etkiler. Ancak \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne getirilen bu k\u0131s\u0131tlama, 3. Maddenin f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki e\u015fit haklar gere\u011fi az\u0131nl\u0131ktaki cinsiyete y\u00f6nelik asgari kotan\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gereklidir. 2 GG hakl\u0131. D\u00fczenlemeler, Konseyin 9 \u015eubat 1976 tarih ve 76\/207\/EEC say\u0131l\u0131 E\u015fit Muamele Direktifini ihlal etmemektedir \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc Madde 2 Paragraf 2’ye g\u00f6re. Erkekler ve kad\u0131nlar i\u00e7in f\u0131rsat e\u015fitli\u011fini te\u015fvik etmeye y\u00f6nelik 4 tedbire kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lm\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

13 Ekim 2004 tarihli bir kararla (- 7 ABR 6\/04 -), Yedinci Senato, se\u00e7im kurulunun 283 ABM \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n\u0131n se\u00e7ime kat\u0131lmas\u0131na izin vermesi nedeniyle yap\u0131lan i\u015f konseyi se\u00e7imlerine bir i\u015fverenin ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 bir \u015fekilde itiraz edemeyece\u011fine karar verdi ve Soru\u015fturmada se\u00e7ilecek i\u015f konseyi \u00fcye say\u0131lar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131. Yaln\u0131zca \u015firket \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 i\u015f konseyinde oy kullanma hakk\u0131na sahiptir. Se\u00e7ilecek i\u015f konseyinin b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc oy kullanma hakk\u0131na sahip \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan say\u0131s\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130\u015f yaratma tedbirindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar \u015fu anlamda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlard\u0131r: B\u00f6l\u00fcm 5 Paragraf. 1 BetrVG’dir ve bu nedenle B\u00f6l\u00fcm 7 C\u00fcmle 1 BetrVG uyar\u0131nca i\u015f konseyi se\u00e7imi i\u00e7in oy kullanma hakk\u0131na sahiptir. \u0130\u015fverenle bir i\u015f ili\u015fkiniz var ve onun \u015firket organizasyonuna entegre oluyorsunuz. Bu nedenle, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 9 BetrVG uyar\u0131nca i\u015f konseyi \u00fcyelerinin say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen i\u015fg\u00fcc\u00fc b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn de dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir. \u0130stihdam yaratma \u00f6nlemlerindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar, i\u015fverenleri taraf\u0131ndan devral\u0131nan projeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde i\u015f y\u00fcr\u00fctmek \u00fczere orada g\u00f6revlendirildikleri i\u00e7in i\u015fverenin \u015firketine entegre edilmektedir. \u0130\u015fle ilgili bu ama\u00e7 kapsam\u0131nda istihdam ediliyorsunuz. Bu, onlar\u0131n faaliyetlerinin amac\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 zamanda entegrasyon umutlar\u0131n\u0131 geli\u015ftirmek i\u00e7in mesleki istikrar veya yeterlilik oldu\u011fu ger\u00e7e\u011fiyle \u00e7eli\u015fmez (\u00a7 260 para. 1 No. 2 SGB III
\nversiyonu 31 Aral\u0131k 2003 tarihine kadar ge\u00e7erlidir).<\/p>\n

In Fortf\u00fchrung seiner bisherigen Rechtsprechung hat der Siebte Senat mit Beschluss vom 10. November 2004 (- 7 ABR 12\/04 -) entschieden, dass ein gek\u00fcndigter Arbeitnehmer nach \u00a7 8 Abs. 1 BetrVG, KSchG’nin 4. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 koruma davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ve bu davan\u0131n se\u00e7im yap\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce yasal olarak reddedilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 durumunda, i\u015f konseyi \u00fcyeli\u011fine se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131 korur. Uygun \u015fekilde i\u015fine son verilen ve ihbar s\u00fcresi dolduktan sonra i\u015fine devam etmeyen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n, BetrVG’nin 7. Maddesi 1. C\u00fcmlesi uyar\u0131nca i\u015f konseyi se\u00e7iminde oy kullanma hakk\u0131na sahip olmad\u0131klar\u0131, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc fiilen entegre olmad\u0131klar\u0131 do\u011frudur. i\u015fverenin operasyonel organizasyonuna. Ancak, i\u015fine son verilen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar ile art\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmayanlar i\u00e7in uygunluk ve oy kullanma hakk\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki ayr\u0131m, aktif ve pasif oy haklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin standartlar\u0131n farkl\u0131 koruyucu ama\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r. Se\u00e7im s\u0131ras\u0131nda, BetrVG’nin 7. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n oy kullanmas\u0131na izin verilip verilmedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan uygunluk belirsizlikte kalabilir. \u0130\u015f konseyi \u00fcyesinin, dava yasal olarak sonu\u00e7lan\u0131ncaya kadar g\u00f6revini yerine getirmesini engelleyerek, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma koruma davas\u0131n\u0131n sonucuna ili\u015fkin belirsizli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131r. Bu durumda yedek \u00fcye 25. maddenin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca istifa eder. 1 C\u00fcmle 2 BetrVG ge\u00e7ici olarak g\u00f6reve ba\u015flad\u0131. Bu ayn\u0131 zamanda i\u015fverenin, istenmeyen adaylar\u0131 i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kararak i\u015f konseyinin yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 etkilemesini de \u00f6nler.<\/p>\n

20 Nisan 2005 tarihli bir kararla (- 7 ABR 20\/04 -), Yedinci Senato, BetrVG’nin 7. ve 8. Maddelerine g\u00f6re \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n B\u00f6l\u00fcm 14 Paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re aktif ve pasif oy haklar\u0131 sorununa karar verdi. 1 A\u00dcG, gruba ait bir \u015firketin, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015f yapmak \u00fczere Almanya’daki ve yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki di\u011fer grup \u015firketlerine herhangi bir i\u015f yapma niyetinde olmaks\u0131z\u0131n devretmek amac\u0131yla kendi ad\u0131na i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri akdetmesi durumunda, i\u015f anayasas\u0131 uyar\u0131nca s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli i\u015fverenin i\u015fine ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131r. k\u00e2r. Bu ayn\u0131 zamanda tek g\u00f6revi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131 gruba ba\u011fl\u0131 di\u011fer \u015firketlere aktarmak olan gruba ba\u011fl\u0131 personel y\u00f6netimi \u015firketi i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 Paragraftaki istisna d\u00fczenlemesi gibi. 3 No. 2 A\u00dcG, A\u00dcG’nin yaln\u0131zca ge\u00e7ici de\u011fil, tamamen grup i\u00e7i olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n i\u015fe al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funu g\u00f6sterir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 14 Paragraf\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frudan uygulanmas\u0131. 1 A\u00dcG, ge\u00e7ici istihdam\u0131n ticari ama\u00e7la yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle hari\u00e7tir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 14 Paragraf\u0131n ilgili uygulamas\u0131. 1 A\u00dcG, \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n izin verilen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n ticari olarak i\u015fe al\u0131nmas\u0131yla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131labilirli\u011fi nedeniyle gereklidir. Karar verdi\u011fi durumda, Yedinci Senato ticarili\u011fi \u015fu anlamda de\u011ferlendirdi: \u00a7 1 paragraftan. 1 A\u00dcG k\u00e2r amac\u0131 g\u00fctmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in reddedildi. Y\u00fczde be\u015flik bir verginin \u00f6denmesi. H. Kirac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fe al\u0131nan her \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n br\u00fct \u00fccreti, s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli i\u015fverenin yaln\u0131zca masraflar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131 durumunda kar elde etme niyetini te\u015fkil etmez.}<\/p>\n

2.<\/strong> Toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin B\u00f6l\u00fcm 77 Paragraf 1’e g\u00f6re bloke edici etkisi. 3 C\u00fcmle 1 BetrVG, toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyle d\u00fczenlenen veya genellikle toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyle d\u00fczenlenen \u00fccretler ve di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin konusu olamaz. Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 2. c\u00fcmlesine g\u00f6re bu sadece a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ge\u00e7erlidir. Birinci Senato, 22 Mart 2005 tarihli karar\u0131yla (- 1 ABR 64\/03 -) toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin Madde 77 Para. 3 C\u00fcmle 1 BetrVG, ne i\u015fverenin bir toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ba\u011fl\u0131 olmas\u0131na ne de i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin h\u00e2l\u00e2 ge\u00e7erli olmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 de\u011fildir. S\u00f6z konusu konunun toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmesinin ilgili sekt\u00f6rde adet olmas\u0131 yeterlidir. Toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme kural\u0131n\u0131n B\u00f6l\u00fcm 77 Para. 3 C\u00fcmle 1 BetrVG, toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin kapsam\u0131na kadar uzan\u0131r. Hem toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmelere ba\u011fl\u0131 \u015firketleri hem de i\u015fletmeleri kapsar.
\ni\u015fverenin toplu pazarl\u0131k birli\u011fine \u00fcye olmas\u0131 durumunda toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme ge\u00e7erli olacakt\u0131r. Bu nedenle \u015firket toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri, di\u011fer \u015firketlerin faaliyetlerine ili\u015fkin \u015firket s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerini engelleyici bir etkiye sahip olamaz. Bu ilkelerin daha da geli\u015ftirilmesi amac\u0131yla Birinci Senato, \u00fcyelikle ilgili kapsam\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen bir toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin, toplu pazarl\u0131k birli\u011finin potansiyel \u00fcyelerini de kapsayacak \u015fekilde anla\u015f\u0131labilece\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir.
\nBu, ger\u00e7ek \u00fcye \u015firketlerin operasyonlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7en bir engelleme etkisine neden olabilir. Toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme hukuku a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131n\u0131n, soyut olarak tan\u0131mlanan bir ekonomik sekt\u00f6re dayal\u0131 bir toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin teknik ve operasyonel kapsam\u0131n\u0131 belirlememeleri zarars\u0131zd\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuru kapsam\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fveren sendikas\u0131na olas\u0131 \u00fcyeli\u011fe g\u00f6re belirlenmesine engel te\u015fkil edecek herhangi bir hukuki kayg\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Her hal\u00fckarda bu, i\u015fveren derne\u011finin t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, her i\u015fverene herhangi bir \u00f6nko\u015ful olmaks\u0131z\u0131n kat\u0131lma olana\u011f\u0131 sa\u011flamamas\u0131, bunun yerine bunu potansiyel \u00fcye \u00e7evresinin belirli bir grupla s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan belirli kriterlere ba\u011flamas\u0131 ko\u015fuluyla ge\u00e7erlidir. sekt\u00f6r ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 gereklili\u011fine benzer \u015fekilde. \u00dcyeli\u011fe ili\u015fkin bir toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin kapsam\u0131n\u0131n potansiyel \u00fcyeleri de kapsay\u0131p kapsamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yorum yoluyla belirlenmelidir. Senato, T\u00dcV toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri i\u00e7in bunu onaylad\u0131. Bu durum 77. maddenin engelleyici etkisine yol a\u00e7maktad\u0131r. 3 C\u00fcmle 1 BetrVG, potansiyel olarak toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmelere tabi olan i\u015fverenler i\u00e7in, yani T\u00dcV toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye \u00fcyelik \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131layan \u015firketler i\u00e7in. Senato ayr\u0131ca B\u00f6l\u00fcm 77 Para. 3 C\u00fcmle 1 BetrVG, yaln\u0131zca toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ba\u011fl\u0131 olmayan bir i\u015fverenin faaliyetlerinde, s\u00f6z konusu d\u00fczenlemenin konusunun B\u00f6l\u00fcm 87 Paragraf uyar\u0131nca i\u015f konseyinin zorunlu ortak karar vermesine uymamas\u0131 durumunda ge\u00e7erlidir. . 1 BetrVG tabidir. Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi d\u00fczenlemesinin bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ortak belirlemeye tabi olmas\u0131, toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ortak belirlemeye tabi olmayan k\u0131s\u0131m i\u00e7in de engelleme etkisinin ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir.<\/p>\n

3. \u0130\u015f konseyinin ortak karar\u0131 ve kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131<\/strong>
\na) Sosyal konularda ortak karar alma
\nToplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmede tazminat d\u00fczenlemeleri bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece, i\u015fveren, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana uygun say\u0131da \u00fccretli izin g\u00fcn\u00fc veya gece boyunca \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan saatler i\u00e7in hak etti\u011fi br\u00fct \u00fccrete uygun bir ek \u00f6deme yapmal\u0131d\u0131r (Madde 6 Para. 5 ArbZG) ). Bu h\u00fck\u00fcm genel olarak i\u015fverenin gece \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle bor\u00e7lu oldu\u011fu tazminat\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131na b\u0131rakmaktad\u0131r. 26 Nisan 2005 tarihli bir kararla (- 1 ABR 1\/04 -), Birinci Senato, yasal tazminat talebini ask\u0131ya almak i\u00e7in toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin gece \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin y\u00fckler i\u00e7in tazminat\u0131 temsil etmesi gerekti\u011fine karar verdi. Bu, \u201ctazminat d\u00fczenlemesi\u201d teriminin ger\u00e7ek anlam\u0131ndan kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r ve sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131na hizmet eden 6. B\u00f6l\u00fcm Paragraf\u0131n\u0131n anlam\u0131na ve amac\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelmektedir. 5 ArbZG. Toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme sadece a\u00e7\u0131k olarak de\u011fil z\u0131mni olarak da d\u00fczenlenebilir. Markal\u0131 catering sekt\u00f6r\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 4 No.lu Madde 2.1’i gibi bir d\u00fczenleme:<\/p>\n

7 Temmuz 2000 tarihli Bat\u0131 Almanya (MTV) – yaln\u0131zca gece \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na ek \u00fccret \u00f6denmemesini \u015fart ko\u015fmaktad\u0131r; bu anlamda bir tazminat d\u00fczenlemesi te\u015fkil etmez. \u00a7 6 para. 5 ArbZG ama. B\u00f6yle bir durumda, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 6 Paragraf 2’ye uygun tutar. 5 ArbZG i\u015fverene telafi edici izin alternatifini se\u00e7me f\u0131rsat\u0131 verir. Bor\u00e7lu olunan telafi edici izin s\u00fcresini yap\u0131land\u0131r\u0131rken, i\u015f konseyi bunu B\u00f6l\u00fcm 87 Paragraf 1 uyar\u0131nca yapma hakk\u0131na sahiptir. 1 No. 2 ve No. 7 BetrVG. \u0130\u015fveren bunu 87. maddenin 1. paragraf\u0131na uygun olarak yapabilir. 1 Giri\u015f yar\u0131m c\u00fcmlesi BetrVG, ortak karar olmaks\u0131z\u0131n, 6. Maddenin Paragraf\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ka\u00e7 \u00fccretli izin g\u00fcn\u00fcne karar verir. 5 ArbZG talep edilmelidir. Uygun tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi \u015firket d\u00fczenlemeleri meselesi de\u011fil, hukuki bir sorundur. Bununla birlikte, ortak belirleme hakk\u0131, operasyonel nedenlerden dolay\u0131 belirli bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde telafi edici izin verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 durumunda, telafi edici izin talebinin \u00fccret talebine d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren bir d\u00fczenlemeyi de kapsar. \u00a7 4 No. 2.1 MTV, “\u00f6deme ek \u00fccretinin” orijinal bir gece \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ek \u00fccreti olmamas\u0131, ancak ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta tahakkuk eden telafi edici izin hakk\u0131n\u0131n vekili olmas\u0131 durumunda i\u015fletmeci taraflarca yap\u0131lan bu t\u00fcr bir d\u00fczenlemeyi hari\u00e7 tutmaz.<\/p>\n

b) Personel konular\u0131nda ortak karar alma<\/p>\n

Birinci Senato, 25 Ocak 2005 tarihli karar\u0131nda (- 1 ABR 61\/03 -), ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i al\u0131m\u0131nda i\u015f konseyinin ortak karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 konusunu ele ald\u0131. BetrVG Madde 99’a g\u00f6re, ge\u00e7ici bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015fe al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u015f konseyinin ortak karar\u0131na tabidir (A\u00dcG Madde 14 Paragraf 3 C\u00fcmle 1). Senato, anla\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n konusunun B\u00f6l\u00fcm 99 Paragraf uyar\u0131nca bir r\u0131za de\u011fi\u015ftirme prosed\u00fcr\u00fc oldu\u011funu do\u011frulad\u0131. 4 BetrVG i\u015fe al\u0131rken sorulmas\u0131 gereken soru, ama\u00e7lanan personel \u00f6nleminin \u015fimdi ve gelecekte izin verilip verilmeyece\u011fidir. (Temyiz) mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi tarihte ge\u00e7erli olan hukuki duruma uygun olarak cevaplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 3 Paragraf 2’de izin verilen ge\u00e7ici istihdam i\u00e7in azami s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndan sonra. 1 No. 6 A\u00dcG aF uyar\u0131nca, ge\u00e7ici bir i\u015f\u00e7inin kal\u0131c\u0131 olarak devral\u0131nmas\u0131, art\u0131k i\u015f konseyinin 99. Maddenin 99. F\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tabi oldu\u011fu yasan\u0131n ihlali anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir. 2 No. 1 BetrVG’nin r\u0131zay\u0131 reddetme hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 9 No. 2, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 3 Para. 1 No. 3 A\u00dcG nF, en az\u0131ndan ticari olmayan ge\u00e7ici istihdam anlam\u0131nda da yasan\u0131n ihlali de\u011fildir. \u00a7 99 para. Ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015fe al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 engelleyen 2 No.lu BetrVG. \u0130\u015f konseyi, uygun olarak i\u015fe al\u0131ma onay verebilir. \u00a7 99 Abs. 2 No. 1 BetrVG yaln\u0131zca bu durumun istihdam\u0131 yasaklayan bir yasay\u0131 ihlal etmesi durumunda reddeder. Bireysel s\u00f6zle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 olmas\u0131 yeterli de\u011fildir. Buna g\u00f6re f\u0131rsat e\u015fitli\u011fi \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n ihlali, ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7inin bu \u015fekilde g\u00f6revlendirilmesine engel de\u011fildir. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n ticari olmayan \u015fekilde i\u015fe al\u0131nmas\u0131 herhangi bir h\u00fck\u00fcmet izni gerektirmez ve e\u015fitlik \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmesi durumunda yasaklanamaz. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 10 Paragraftaki d\u00fczenlemeler. A\u00dcG’nin 4, \u00a7 13 yeni versiyonu, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n ama\u00e7lanan korunmas\u0131n\u0131n bireysel yasal yollarla ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi gerekti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya koyuyor. Senato ayr\u0131ca, bor\u00e7lunun daimi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n genel olarak B\u00f6l\u00fcm 99 Paragraf 1’e tabi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 2 No. 3 BetrVG.<\/p>\n

Birinci Senato, 25 Ocak 2005 tarihli karar\u0131yla (- 1 ABR 59\/03 -), Federal \u0130dare Mahkemesi ile mutabakata vararak, normal \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerinin hacminin hem s\u00fcresi hem de kapsam\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemsiz olmayan bir geni\u015flemeye karar verdi. Halihaz\u0131rda B\u00f6l\u00fcm 99 Paragraf uyar\u0131nca yeni bir ortamda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi kapsam\u0131nda bor\u00e7lu olmalar\u0131. 1 c\u00fcmle 1 BetrVG’yi temsil eder. Bu do\u011frudan y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin metninden kaynaklanmamaktad\u0131r. Ancak bu, \u201ctutum\u201d teriminin ger\u00e7ek anlam\u0131yla \u00e7eli\u015fmez \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc \u201ctutum\u201d, \u015fu anlamdad\u0131r: \u015eirkete entegrasyon ayn\u0131 zamanda entegrasyonun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi s\u00fcreye g\u00f6re de belirlenir. Bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, haftada on saat yerine haftada 40 saat \u015firkette \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yorsa art\u0131k eskisi gibi \u015firkete entegre olamaz. Bundan sonra, \u00f6nceki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerindeki art\u0131\u015f, art\u0131k i\u015f konseyinin, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ilk i\u015fe al\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin (verilen veya de\u011fi\u015ftirilen) onay\u0131 kapsam\u0131na girmez. BetrVG Madde 99’a g\u00f6re ortak karar verme hakk\u0131n\u0131n anlam\u0131 ve amac\u0131, \u00f6nceki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerindeki dikkate de\u011fer olmayan art\u0131\u015f\u0131n yeni bir pozisyon olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesini gerektirmektedir. \u0130\u015f konseyinin i\u015fe al\u0131m s\u0131ras\u0131nda ortak karar verme hakk\u0131, \u00f6zellikle halihaz\u0131rda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakta olan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erlidir. Yar\u0131 zamanl\u0131 bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n \u00f6nceden kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan normal \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerinin kapsam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde art\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 durumunda bunlar etkilenir. Hi\u00e7bir ayarlama, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerinde ge\u00e7ici veya k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir art\u0131\u015f anlam\u0131na gelmez. \u0130stihdam i\u00e7in gerekli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerindeki art\u0131\u015f\u0131n asgari s\u00fcresi 95. maddenin 1. paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlenir. 3 BetrVG bir aydan uzun bir s\u00fcre. Her durumda, i\u015fverenin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerinin uzat\u0131lmas\u0131yla doldurulan pozisyonu ilan etmesi veya i\u015f konseyinin BetrVG Madde 93 uyar\u0131nca ilan talep etmesi durumunda gerekli asgari kapsama ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olur. Senato ayr\u0131ca \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerinin azalt\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n devams\u0131zl\u0131k anlam\u0131na gelmedi\u011fine karar verdi. Schon dem Wortsinn nach verlangt eine Einstellung zwar nicht die vollst\u00e4ndige Neueingliederung, aber zumindest einen Zuwachs an Eingliederung in den Nach der st\u00e4ndigen Rechtsprechung des Ersten Senats setzt der Lauf der Wochenfrist des \u00a7 99 Abs. 3 BetrVG, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 99 Paragraf\u0131 uyar\u0131nca i\u015f konseyinin tam olarak bilgilendirilmesini gerektirir. 1 c\u00fcmle 1 BetrVG varsay\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Haftal\u0131k son tarih belirlenmemi\u015fse, i\u015f konseyi a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki anlamda bireysel personel \u00f6nlemini onaylayamaz: bu d\u00fczenleme mahkemeler taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fi\u015ftirilemez. Birinci Senato’nun 28 Haziran 2005 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 1 ABR 26\/04 -) i\u015fveren, i\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinden i\u015f ba\u015fvurusunda bulunanlar\u0131n ki\u015filikleri hakk\u0131nda se\u00e7im karar\u0131yla ilgili bilgi edinirse, i\u015f konseyini bilgilendirir. Bu konu\u015fmalar\u0131 \u00f6\u011fretme karar\u0131nda \u00f6nemli olan i\u00e7erik hakk\u0131nda. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 99 Paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re bilgi sa\u011flama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc. 1 C\u00fcmle 1 BetrVG, i\u015f konseyine B\u00f6l\u00fcm 99 Paragraf uyar\u0131nca yorum yapma hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ihtiya\u00e7 duydu\u011fu bilgileri sa\u011flamaya hizmet eder. 2 BetrVG’yi do\u011fru \u015fekilde kullanabilmek i\u00e7in. \u00d6zel bir i\u015fveren, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak belgelesin veya belgelemese de, bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin kendisini ilgilendiren i\u00e7eri\u011fi hakk\u0131nda i\u015f konseyini bilgilendirmelidir. \u0130\u015f konseyine ama\u00e7lanan se\u00e7im i\u00e7in belirleyici olacak ko\u015fullar hakk\u0131nda bilgi vermelidir. Ancak o zaman bu konuda yorum yapabilir ve gerekirse \u00f6nerilerde bulunabilirler. \u0130\u015fverenin, kad\u0131nlar\u0131n ilerleme plan\u0131nda e\u015fit becerilere ve uygunlu\u011fa sahip kad\u0131nlara \u00f6zel \u00f6nem verme taahh\u00fcd\u00fcnde bulunmas\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 niteliklere sahip olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen yap\u0131lan m\u00fclakata dayal\u0131 olarak erkek ba\u015fvuru sahibi lehine karar vermesi halinde, bu durum daha da b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ge\u00e7erlidir. Bu durumlarda, i\u015f konseyinin, i\u015fverenin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerde ba\u015fvuranlar\u0131n performans\u0131, uygunlu\u011fu ve yetene\u011fi hakk\u0131nda edindi\u011fi bilgilere sahip olmas\u0131 \u00f6zellikle \u00f6nemlidir. B\u00f6yle bir durumda i\u015fveren, i\u015f konseyine, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin i\u00e7eri\u011fi hakk\u0131nda bilgi vermeden bile, ba\u015fvuru sahipleri hakk\u0131nda tam bilgi sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 varsayamaz. Onay talebini ald\u0131ktan sonra, i\u015f konseyi bilgilerin eksik oldu\u011funu zaman\u0131nda belirtmez ve i\u015fverenden ba\u015fvuru sahibinin kimli\u011fine ili\u015fkin bilgileri tamamlamas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmezse, Madde 99 Para. 3 BetrVG bu nedenle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmedi.<\/p>\n

\u0130\u00e7tihat hukuku, sosyal plan yard\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 koruma davas\u0131ndan feragat edilmesine ba\u011fl\u0131 hale getirilemeyece\u011fini do\u011frulamaktad\u0131r. Bu, i\u015fyeri anayasas\u0131n\u0131n 75. Maddenin 75. Paragraf\u0131ndaki e\u015fit muamele ilkesinden kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r. 1 c\u00fcmle 1 BetrVG. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1a KSchG’nin bir sonucu olarak bu konuda hi\u00e7bir \u015fey de\u011fi\u015fmedi. Burada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, sosyal plan yard\u0131m\u0131ndan farkl\u0131 bir i\u015fleve sahiptir. \u0130\u015f kay\u0131plar\u0131 i\u00e7in k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren sosyal plan, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karmalar\u0131n etkinli\u011fine dayan\u0131yor. \u00d6te yandan, bireysel k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 (KSchG Madde 1a’ya g\u00f6re olan\u0131 da dahil olmak \u00fczere) i\u015fverenin, fesih i\u015fleminin i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma koruma s\u00fcrecinde etkisiz kalabilece\u011fi riski dikkate al\u0131narak d\u00fczenli olarak kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Sosyal plan yard\u0131mlar\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma koruma davas\u0131 a\u00e7maktan vazge\u00e7mesine ba\u011fl\u0131 k\u0131l\u0131namasa bile, \u015firketin faaliyetlerini de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi durumunda, g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fc \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde faaliyet g\u00f6steren taraflar\u0131n sosyal plan\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra sosyal yard\u0131m sa\u011flamas\u0131 da engellenmez. acil planlama g\u00fcvenli\u011fi i\u015fverenin \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131nad\u0131r \u00c7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 koruma talebinde bulunma f\u0131rsat\u0131 yoktur
\nfaydalan\u0131yor. \u0130\u015fletmeci taraflar\u0131n b\u00f6yle bir d\u00fczenleme yapma konusundaki temel yetkisi B\u00f6l\u00fcm 88 BetrVG’ye dayanmaktad\u0131r. \u0130\u015fyeri t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 75’inci maddesinin e\u015fit muamele ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 de\u011fildir. 1 c\u00fcmle 1 BetrVG, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 612 a BGB’deki disiplin cezas\u0131 yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da ihlal etmez. Bununla birlikte, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma korumas\u0131 talebinde bulunulmamas\u0131 durumunda faydalar vaat eden g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fc bir \u015firket s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi, sosyal plan k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6demelerinin ilgili feragata ba\u011fl\u0131 k\u0131l\u0131nmas\u0131 yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131ramaz. Hileli bir hilenin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bireysel vakan\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Bu, \u00f6zellikle sosyal plan\u0131n ekonomik dezavantajlar\u0131n yeterli d\u00fczeyde azalt\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamamas\u0131 durumunda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kabilir.<\/p>\n

ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan maliyetler. Yedinci Senato, 17 A\u011fustos 2005 tarihli karar\u0131yla (- 7 ABR 56\/04 -), i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lanacak bu masraflar\u0131n, i\u015f konseyinin bir i\u015f mahkemesi karar\u0131nda yer almas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti\u011fi bir avukat\u0131n \u00fccretlerini de i\u00e7erdi\u011fini do\u011frulad\u0131. – \u0130\u015fyeri anayasa kanunu kapsam\u0131ndaki haklar\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015flemleri yapmak. \u0130\u015f konseyi, bir avukat atayarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan masraflar konusunda i\u015fverenden muafiyet hakk\u0131 elde eder. Ayr\u0131ca Yedinci Senato, i\u015f konseyinin muaf tutulaca\u011f\u0131 yasal har\u00e7lar\u0131n, \u015fu anlamda varl\u0131klara ili\u015fkin y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir: B\u00f6l\u00fcm 55 Para. 1 No. 1 InsO, e\u011fer iflas y\u00f6neticisi, i\u015fverenin varl\u0131klar\u0131 \u00fczerinde iflas davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 240 ZPO uyar\u0131nca kesintiye u\u011frayan ilk etapta bekleyen bir karar alma s\u00fcrecini ba\u015flat\u0131r ve devam ettirirse. Avukatl\u0131k masraflar\u0131n\u0131n, iflas i\u015flemlerinin ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce veya sonra yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 \u00f6nemli de\u011fildir. \u0130le
\n\u0130\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015flat\u0131lan ve Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 240. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kesintiye u\u011frayan karar alma s\u00fcrecinin ba\u015flamas\u0131 \u00fczerine, iflas idarecisi, 40. maddenin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca karar alma s\u00fcrecini devral\u0131r. 1 BetrVG, i\u015fverenin i\u015f konseyinin katland\u0131\u011f\u0131 prosed\u00fcr masraflar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ta\u015f\u0131r ve toplu bir sorumluluk yarat\u0131r.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no”][vc_column][vc_empty_space][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row triangle_shape=”no”][vc_column][vc_column_text]1. \u0130\u015f konseyi se\u00e7imi B\u00f6l\u00fcm 19 Paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re. 1 BetrVG, oy verme hakk\u0131, uygunluk veya se\u00e7im prosed\u00fcr\u00fcne ili\u015fkin temel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ihlal edilmesi ve ihlalin se\u00e7im sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirmemesi veya etkilememesi durumunda herhangi bir d\u00fczeltme yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 durumunda, bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma konseyi se\u00e7imine itiraz edilebilir. Yedinci Senato, 13 Ekim 2004 tarihli karar\u0131yla (- 7 ABR 5\/04 -) B\u00f6l\u00fcm 2 Para. 5 11 Aral\u0131k 2001 (WO) tarihli versiyondaki se\u00e7im d\u00fczenlemeleri, \u015fu anlamda se\u00e7im prosed\u00fcr\u00fcne ili\u015fkin temel bir d\u00fczenlemedir: \u00a7 19 paragraf. 1 BetrVG’dir. Bu y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe g\u00f6re se\u00e7im kurulu, i\u015f konseyi se\u00e7imine ba\u015flanmadan \u00f6nce Almanca bilmeyen yabanc\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n se\u00e7im s\u00fcreci, se\u00e7men ve aday listelerinin haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":12826,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-13033","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nRechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-27T11:52:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@rasteinwachs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"21 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-20T06:39:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-27T11:52:31+00:00\",\"description\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/sentencias-bag-2005\\\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\u0130\u015f hukuku kararlar\u0131\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-hukuku-kararlari\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sentencias BAG 2005\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/arbeitsrecht-urteile\\\/bag-urteile-2005\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Anayasa hukuku \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131r\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"description\":\"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":[\"Organization\",\"Place\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"width\":174,\"height\":76,\"caption\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/rasteinwachs\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA\"],\"telephone\":[]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","og_description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","og_url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","article_modified_time":"2023-11-27T11:52:31+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@rasteinwachs","twitter_misc":{"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"21 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\/","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-11-20T06:39:18+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-27T11:52:31+00:00","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/sentencias-bag-2005\/anayasa-hukuku-calisir\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\u0130\u015f hukuku kararlar\u0131","item":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-hukuku-kararlari\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sentencias BAG 2005","item":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/arbeitsrecht-urteile\/bag-urteile-2005\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Anayasa hukuku \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131r"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":["Organization","Place"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","width":174,"height":76,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","https:\/\/x.com\/rasteinwachs","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA"],"telephone":[]}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13033"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13033\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}