{"id":12596,"date":"2023-11-18T07:55:22","date_gmt":"2023-11-18T06:55:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\/"},"modified":"2023-11-24T06:10:01","modified_gmt":"2023-11-24T05:10:01","slug":"is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0130\u015f ili\u015fkisinden kaynaklanan talepler"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row content_width=”grid” content_aligment=”center” triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1696926719838{padding-bottom: 10px !important;background-position: center !important;background-repeat: no-repeat !important;background-size: cover !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\t1. Verg\u00fctung<\/h2>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\ta) Schwarzgeldabrede<\/h2>[vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291044255{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Be\u015finci Senato’nun 17 Mart 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 5 AZR 301\/09 -), \u00fccretlerin vergiler ve sosyal g\u00fcvenlik primleri dikkate al\u0131nmadan \u00f6denmesine ili\u015fkin anla\u015fma (“siyah”) tek ba\u015f\u0131na net bir anla\u015fma te\u015fkil etmemektedir. \u00fccret anla\u015fmas\u0131. Kara para s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin taraflar\u0131 yaln\u0131zca vergi ve sosyal g\u00fcvenlik primlerinden ka\u00e7\u0131nmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lar, i\u015fverenin bunlar\u0131 \u00f6demesini sa\u011flamay\u0131 ama\u00e7lamaz. Ayr\u0131ca B\u00f6l\u00fcm 14 Paragraftan. 2 SGB IV net \u00fccret s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine uymamaktad\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re ka\u00e7ak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan i\u015f\u00e7i i\u00e7in talep edilecek sosyal g\u00fcvenlik primlerinin toplam\u0131 hesaplan\u0131rken net \u00fccret \u00fczerinde anla\u015fmaya var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131yor. Ancak bu kurgu yaln\u0131zca sosyal g\u00fcvenlik hukukunu etkilemekte ve i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin taraflar\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki medeni hukuk hukuki ili\u015fkisini kapsamamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\tb) Eingruppierung<\/h2>[vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291942992{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]\u00a7 79 paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re. 1 Normal s\u00f6zle\u015fme a\u015famas\u0131 (NV a\u015famas\u0131)<\/em>, di\u011fer \u015feylerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra opera korosu \u00fcyelerine \u00f6denen \u00fccreti de i\u00e7erir. k\u0131sa solo konu\u015fma ve\/veya \u015fark\u0131 s\u00f6yleme performanslar\u0131 telafi edilir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 79 Paragraf uyar\u0131nca daha k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck partilerin devral\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in. \u00d6te yandan, 2 harfli bir NV a\u015famas\u0131n\u0131n uygun bir \u00f6zel \u00fccret \u00f6demesi gerekir. Ayn\u0131 durum 79. Maddenin paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re de ge\u00e7erlidir. 3 NV Sahnesi, m\u00fczikal bir sahne \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n konser performans\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece konserlere kat\u0131l\u0131m i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erlidir. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato’nun 16 Aral\u0131k 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 6 AZR 487\/09 -)<\/em>, opera korosu \u00fcyesinin opera korosu toplulu\u011fundan solist olarak ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda \u201ck\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir k\u0131s\u0131m\u201d \u00f6zel \u00fccrete tabidir. Bu, spesifik \u00fcretimden ve kapsam\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir hizmet sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 varsaymaktad\u0131r. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, Mozart’\u0131n \u201cIdomeneo\u201d operas\u0131n\u0131n icras\u0131nda ve\/veya Edmund Nick’in \u201cLife in Our Time\u201d lirik s\u00fcitinin konser performans\u0131nda yer alan toplam yedi davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davalar ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131kla sonu\u00e7land\u0131. Davac\u0131lar, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 53 NV a\u015famas\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi, ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291950000{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]tahkim a\u015famas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilir. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi ve Eyalet \u0130\u015f Mahkemesinde oldu\u011fu gibi, Y\u00fcksek A\u015fama Tahkim Mahkemesinin tahkim karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik davalar Federal \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131kla sonu\u00e7land\u0131. Y\u00fcksek A\u015famal\u0131 Tahkim Mahkemesi hakl\u0131 olarak davac\u0131lar\u0131n “Idomeneo” operas\u0131ndaki \u015fark\u0131 performanslar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6zel \u00fccret gerektirmeyen k\u0131sa solo performanslar olarak de\u011ferlendirdi. Tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 t\u00fcm \u015fark\u0131 performanslar\u0131nda vokal gruplar\u0131n\u0131n sadece notaya uygun olarak bireysel (\u201csolo\u201d)<\/em> icra edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131, herhangi bir \u00f6zel \u00fccret \u00f6deme zorunlulu\u011funu do\u011furmaz. Y\u00fcksek Sahne Tahkim Mahkemesi, farkl\u0131 manzara unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle, bestecinin m\u00fczikal iradesini somutla\u015ft\u0131ran notaya dayal\u0131 olarak hukuki bir hata yapmam\u0131\u015f ve solo icralar\u0131 k\u0131sa olarak de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Bu ayn\u0131 zamanda \u015eark\u0131 S\u00f6z\u00fc S\u00fcitindeki 5 Nolu Erkek D\u00f6rtl\u00fcs\u00fc i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erliydi. Ayn\u0131 zamanda bir m\u00fczikal sahne \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n konser performans\u0131n\u0131n bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olarak \u015fark\u0131 s\u00f6yleme performanslar\u0131n\u0131 da kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, 79. Maddenin Paragraf\u0131na dayanarak bir iddia da reddedildi. 3 NV a\u015famas\u0131 kapal\u0131.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\tc) Entgeltfortzahlung im Krankheitsfall<\/h2>[vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291295599{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 Paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re. 1 EFZG, normal \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerine g\u00f6re hak etti\u011fi \u00fccretleri \u00f6demeye devam edecektir. Yasal olarak d\u00fczenlenen s\u00fcrekli \u00fccret \u00f6demesi, 4. Maddenin Paragraf\u0131 kapsam\u0131na girmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece, ayl\u0131k tutarlar olarak belirlenmeyen maa\u015f bile\u015fenlerini de i\u00e7erir. 1a EFZG d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 Paragrafta belirtilenlerden. 1 EFZG, \u00a7 21 c\u00fcmle 2 TV\u00f6D, ayl\u0131k tutarlar belirlenmeyen \u00fccret bile\u015fenleri i\u00e7in \u00fccret kayb\u0131 ilkesinden sapmaktad\u0131r. Bunlar, i\u015f g\u00f6remezli\u011fin ba\u015flamas\u0131ndan \u00f6nceki son \u00fc\u00e7 tam takvim ay\u0131 esas al\u0131narak ortalama olarak \u00f6denir. Kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerinin kapsam\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015famama durumunun ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131ndan \u00f6nceki \u00fc\u00e7 tam takvim ay\u0131ndan daha k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre \u00f6nce de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015fse, bu hesaplama s\u00fcresi, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1’deki Protokol Beyan\u0131 uyar\u0131nca iki tam takvim ay\u0131na veya bir tam takvim ay\u0131na k\u0131salt\u0131l\u0131r. 21 C\u00fcmle 2 TV\u00f6D. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerinin de\u011fi\u015fmesi ile hastal\u0131k nedeniyle i\u015f g\u00f6remezli\u011fin ba\u015flamas\u0131 aras\u0131nda tam takvim ay\u0131ndan daha az bir s\u00fcrenin bulunmas\u0131 halinde, toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmede ayl\u0131k olarak belirlenmeyen \u00fccret bile\u015fenlerinin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamaktad\u0131r. miktarlar. Bu, yasal olarak d\u00fczenlenen kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131 ilkesinin devam etti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelir. Bu, Be\u015finci Senato’nun 20 Ocak 2010 tarihli karar\u0131nda (- 5 AZR 53\/09 -)<\/em> karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4 Paragraf 2’den birini sa\u011flamas\u0131 ama\u00e7lan\u0131yorsa. 1 EFZG, devam edecek \u00fccretlere ili\u015fkin farkl\u0131 bir de\u011ferlendirme esas\u0131 belirlenmesi halinde bunun a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenlemeye tabi tutulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmektedir.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\td) Annahmeverzug<\/h2>[vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291354872{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Alman Medeni Kanunu’nun (BGB) 294. maddesine g\u00f6re i\u015fveren, yaln\u0131zca \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015fi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi \u015fekilde teklif etmesi durumunda kabul temerr\u00fcd\u00fcnde bulunur. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacak i\u015fin sadece i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde belirtilmesi durumunda, Madde 106 C\u00fcmle 1 GewO’ya g\u00f6re yap\u0131lacak i\u015fin i\u00e7eri\u011fini daha ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak belirlemek i\u015fverenin sorumlulu\u011fundad\u0131r. \u0130\u015fveren, Be\u015finci Senato’nun 19 May\u0131s 2010’daki karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan geldi (- 5 AZR 162\/09 -)<\/em> Bu nedenle, ki\u015fisel nedenlerden dolay\u0131, i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan daha \u00f6nce etkin olarak verilen i\u015fi art\u0131k yerine getiremeyecek durumda olan i\u015f\u00e7inin, istihdam kapsam\u0131nda ma\u011fduriyete uygun ba\u015fka bir i\u015f teklif etmesi halinde, kabulde temerr\u00fct s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. s\u00f6zle\u015fme anla\u015fmas\u0131. Ancak bu durumda i\u015fveren, 241. Maddenin 2. F\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki inceleme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nedeniyle bunu yapabilir. 2 BGB, s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan y\u00f6netim hakk\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gibidir[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291362896{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]\u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n tekrar hizmet sunabilmesi i\u00e7in yeniden uygulanacakt\u0131r. \u0130\u015fverenin bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe kusurlu bir \u015fekilde ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranmas\u0131 halinde 280. Maddenin bendi uyar\u0131nca tazminat talebinde bulunulur. \u00dccret kayb\u0131 nedeniyle 1 BGB. \u0130\u015fverenin, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n yapaca\u011f\u0131 i\u015fi yeniden tan\u0131mlama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ac\u0131ya uygun bir i\u015fyerine transfer talebinde bulunmas\u0131n\u0131 ve performans\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcndeki engelleri ortadan kald\u0131rmak i\u00e7in i\u015fverene gelecekteki istihdam\u0131n\u0131 nas\u0131l \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Kural olarak, i\u015fverenin yeni faaliyeti devretmesi makul ve hukuken m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ise, bu talebe uymak zorundad\u0131r. Ekonomik hususlar\u0131 da i\u00e7erebilen operasyonel nedenler veya di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara y\u00f6nelik de\u011ferlendirme g\u00f6revleri bununla \u00e7eli\u015fmiyorsa, makull\u00fck varsay\u0131labilir. Ma\u011fduriyete uygun bir i\u015f yoksa di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlarla takas yoluyla ba\u015fka bir i\u015f de verilebilir. Bu, i\u015fverenin, i\u015f\u00e7iye vekalet hakk\u0131 yoluyla de\u011fi\u015ftirilecek ba\u015fka bir i\u015fi devredebilmesini, uygulaman\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7inin makul takdirine uygun olmas\u0131n\u0131 ve i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fini kabul etmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. Kanunen, i\u015f konseyinin 99. maddenin 99. paragraf\u0131 uyar\u0131nca \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan de\u011fi\u015fimine ili\u015fkin transferleri onaylamas\u0131 halinde, ba\u015fka bir i\u015fe atamak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. 1 BetrVG reddetti. \u0130\u015fverenin B\u00f6l\u00fcm 99 Paragraf uyar\u0131nca bir r\u0131za de\u011fi\u015ftirme prosed\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc y\u00fcr\u00fctmesi gerekli de\u011fildir. 4 BetrVG ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmelidir.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\te) Tariflicher Feiertagszuschlag<\/h2>[vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291651361{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Verwendet ein Tarifvertrag einen Rechtsbegriff der Gesetzessprache, ist dieser Begriff in seiner allgemeinen rechtlichen Bedeutung auszulegen, sofern sich nicht aus dem Tarifvertrag etwas anderes ergibt. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, Be\u015finci Senato’nun 17 Mart 2010 tarihli karar\u0131yla (- 5 AZR 317\/09 -)<\/em> Resmi tatillerdeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7in ek \u00fccret \u00f6ng\u00f6ren bir toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme, Paskalya Pazar\u0131ndaki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7in bu ek \u00fccretin yaln\u0131zca bu g\u00fcn\u00fcn eyalet yasalar\u0131na g\u00f6re devlet taraf\u0131ndan tan\u0131nan bir tatil olmas\u0131 durumunda \u00f6denece\u011fi \u015feklinde yorumlan\u0131r. Burada belirleyici olan, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin ifa yerinin bulundu\u011fu \u00fclkenin hukukudur. Anla\u015fmazl\u0131k durumunda bu gereksinimler kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131. Senato ayr\u0131ca \u015firketin uygulamas\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak tatil ek \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmesine ili\u015fkin talebi de reddetti. E\u011fer – bu durumda oldu\u011fu gibi – i\u015fg\u00fcc\u00fc, i\u015fverenden bir hizmet kabul ederken, i\u015fverenin toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 varsayarsa, hizmetin verilmesi hukuken \u015firketin bir uygulamay\u0131 hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karacak z\u0131mni bir teklif olarak anla\u015f\u0131lamaz. toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin \u00fczerinde bir hizmet i\u00e7eri\u011fi ile.<\/p>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\tf) Stufenzuordnung nach dem TV-L<\/h2>[vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291683640{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]TV-L d\u00fczenlemelerine g\u00f6re, di\u011fer hususlar\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n ayl\u0131k \u00fccret miktar\u0131 da belirlenmektedir. bir maa\u015f seviyesine atand\u0131ktan sonra. \u00a7 16 paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re. 2 C\u00fcmle 1 TV-L, ilgili mesleki deneyime sahip olmad\u0131klar\u0131 s\u00fcrece \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar i\u015fe al\u0131nd\u0131klar\u0131nda 1. seviyeye atan\u0131r. \u0130lgili mesleki deneyim s\u00fcreleri dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 16 Para. Genellikle en fazla alt\u0131 ay s\u00fcren bir kesinti sonras\u0131nda ayn\u0131 i\u015fverenle yeni bir i\u015f ili\u015fkisi kuran \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar ile ba\u015fka bir i\u015fverenden \u00fclkeye ta\u015f\u0131nanlar aras\u0131nda 2 c\u00fcmle 2 ve 3 TV-L. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato’nun 23 Eyl\u00fcl 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 6 AZR 180\/09 -)<\/em>, bu farkl\u0131la\u015fma 3. maddenin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki e\u015fitlik ilkesine uygundur. 1 GG uyumludur. Bunun ihlali, yaln\u0131zca \u00f6z\u00fcnde ayn\u0131 olan bir \u015feye farkl\u0131 davran\u0131lmas\u0131 veya \u00f6z\u00fcnde farkl\u0131 olan bir \u015feye ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde davran\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda meydana gelir. Prensip olarak, ko\u015fullar\u0131 e\u015fit \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlemek i\u00e7in yeterince benzer olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi gereken \u00f6zelliklerin belirlenmesi standart belirleyiciye kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 16 Paragraf h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ili\u015fkin olarak. Hinsichtlich der von \u00a7 16 Abs. Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn 2. c\u00fcmlesiyle toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131, daha \u00f6nce ayn\u0131 i\u015fveren ad\u0131na kamu hizmetinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olanlar\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fka bir i\u015fverenden, \u00f6zellikle de \u00f6zel hukuka tabi bir i\u015fverenden \u00fclkeye gelen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar, toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131n\u0131n korunmaya de\u011fer g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklara sahip de\u011fildir. Buna ek olarak, toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin taraflar\u0131n\u0131n, tipik bir bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131yla, edinilen mesleki deneyimin farkl\u0131 \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirilmesini hakl\u0131 k\u0131lan nedenlerin bulundu\u011funu varsaymalar\u0131na izin verildi. \u00c7o\u011fu durumda, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n devlet taraf\u0131ndan yeniden i\u015fe al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra, daha \u00f6nce orada edindikleri mesleki deneyimlerini, mesleki deneyimlerini genellikle tamamen farkl\u0131 bir \u00fclkede edinen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlardan daha h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde tam olarak kullanabileceklerini varsayma hakk\u0131na sahiplerdi. di\u011fer i\u015fverenlerin yap\u0131lar\u0131 var.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\tg) Wechselschichtzulage nach TV\u00f6D<\/h2>[vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291713559{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]\u00a7 8 paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re. 5 C\u00fcmle 1 TV\u00f6D, s\u00fcrekli vardiya usul\u00fc \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara ayl\u0131k har\u00e7l\u0131k verilmektedir. Onuncu Senato’nun 24 Mart 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 10 AZR 58\/09 -),<\/em> bu \u00f6dene\u011fe hak kazan\u0131lmas\u0131 temel olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015fi d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcml\u00fc vardiyalarda yapmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmektedir.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291724552{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]asl\u0131nda sa\u011flar. Ancak, belirli bir vardiya t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn veya toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin gerektirdi\u011fi gece vardiyalar\u0131n\u0131n ifas\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131rf \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n TV\u00f6D 21. Madde 1 C\u00fcmle 1’e uygun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle yerine getirilmemesi, i\u015fin fiili ifas\u0131 ile ayn\u0131d\u0131r. hastal\u0131k, tatil, ek izin, i\u015ften izin veya 24 ve 31 Aral\u0131k tarihlerinde serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lma, maa\u015f \u00f6demesinin devam etti\u011fi i\u015flerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktan muaft\u0131r. Bu durumlarda, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015ften muafiyet olmaks\u0131z\u0131n gerekli vardiyalarda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 yeterlidir. Toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcrekli d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcml\u00fc vardiya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00f6dene\u011fi konusunda 4. Maddenin \u00fccret kayb\u0131 ilkesine ba\u015fvurduklar\u0131na dair a\u00e7\u0131k g\u00f6stergeler bulunmaktad\u0131r. 1 EFZG ve B\u00f6l\u00fcm 1 BUrlG’nin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar aleyhine d\u00fczenlenmesi toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme standartlar\u0131nda bulunamaz.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\th) Besitzstandszulage f\u00fcr kinderbezogenen Ortszuschlag<\/h2>[vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291804088{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi kapsam\u0131nda yar\u0131 zamanl\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n, toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi kanunu – genel toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi d\u00fczenlemelerinin (BAT-O)<\/em> uyarlanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik \u00e7ocukla ilgili yerel \u00f6dene\u011fi, Madde 34 Para. 1 C\u00fcmle 1 BAT-O orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak k\u0131salt\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. D\u00fczenleme 29. maddenin B maddesinin B f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re yap\u0131l\u0131r. 6 C\u00fcmle 3 BAT-O uygulamas\u0131 yok. TV\u00f6D’ye ge\u00e7i\u015fin ard\u0131ndan, tam zamanl\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan e\u015f, toplu transfer s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 11. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f stat\u00fc \u00f6dene\u011fine ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00e7ocu\u011fa ili\u015fkin yerel \u00f6dene\u011fe kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelen bir yard\u0131ma hak kazanacakt\u0131r. E\u015fin hak sahibi olmas\u0131, fiilen \u00e7ocuk paras\u0131 almas\u0131na de\u011fil, \u00e7ocuk paras\u0131 yararlan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 olarak belirlenmi\u015f olsayd\u0131, m\u00fclk yard\u0131m\u0131na hak kazan\u0131p kazanamayaca\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. 25 \u015eubat 2010 tarihli kararla (- 6 AZR 809\/08 -) <\/em>Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato m\u00fclkiyet \u00f6dene\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u00f6nceki i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131 onaylad\u0131 (vgl. BAG 13 A\u011fustos 2009 \u2013 6 AZR 319\/08 -).<\/em> Yar\u0131 zamanl\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan BAT-O’dan TV-L’ye transfer edildikten sonra, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 11 Paragraf\u0131 uyar\u0131nca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelen bir hak sahipli\u011fi \u00f6dene\u011fine hak kazand\u0131. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n federal eyaletlerden TV-L’ye devredilmesine ve ge\u00e7i\u015f hukukunun (TV\u00dc eyaletleri)<\/em> d\u00fczenlenmesine ili\u015fkin toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 1. maddesi.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\ti) Strukturausgleich nach dem TV\u00dc-Bund<\/h2>[vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291839256{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]\u00a7 12 Abs. 1 C\u00fcmle 1 TV\u00dc-Bund, yap\u0131sal tazminat tablosuna (TV\u00dc-Bund Ek 3)<\/em> g\u00f6re gerekli ko\u015fullar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 ko\u015fuluyla, TV\u00f6D’ye devredilen federal \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara s\u00f6zde yap\u0131sal tazminat \u00f6denmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato 22 Nisan 2010’da karar vermek zorunda kald\u0131[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291852304{padding-top: 15px !important;}”](- 6 AZR 962\/08 -)<\/em> bu tabloda yer alan bilgilerin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorusunu ele almaktad\u0131r. <\/em>“Promosyon – olmadan” \u00f6zelli\u011fi, transferle ilgili \u00fccret grubuna \u00f6nceki bir terfi yoluyla ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya sadece transfer tarihinde ilgili \u00fccret grubundan ba\u015fka bir terfinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirip gerektirmedi\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmelidir. D\u00fczenlemenin lafz\u0131, genel toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme ba\u011flam\u0131, anlam ve amac\u0131 ile her iki olas\u0131 yorumun da uygulanabilirli\u011fi net bir yoruma yol a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, yap\u0131sal tazminat\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f tarihine geri d\u00f6nmek gerekmektedir. TV\u00dc-Bund’da ve toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131n\u0131n iradesinde ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle Senato, hukuki anla\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 daha fazla a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in alt mahkemeye geri g\u00f6nderdi. Toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin taraflar\u0131 d\u00fczenleme iradesi \u00fczerinde anla\u015famazlarsa, tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 \u00f6zelli\u011fin, son tarih olan 1 Ekim 2005’te ba\u015fka bir terfinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli olaca\u011f\u0131 \u015fekilde yorumlanmas\u0131 gerekecektir. Bu durumda normun a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131, d\u00fczenleme tarafs\u0131z olarak okundu\u011funda daha a\u00e7\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fcnen ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla normun muhataplar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan genellikle yetkili olarak alg\u0131lanan yoruma tercih verilmesini gerektirmektedir.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\tj) Undifferenziertes Leistungsentgelt<\/h2>[vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291885256{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]\u00a7 18 Abs. 2 TV\u00f6D (VKA)<\/em>, 1 Ocak 2007’den itibaren performans \u00fccretinin uygulamaya konmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir. 31 Temmuz 2007 tarihine kadar bu konuda bir \u015firket d\u00fczenlemesine var\u0131lmam\u0131\u015fsa \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar, protokol beyan\u0131n\u0131n 18’inci maddesinin 6’nc\u0131 maddesinin 6’nc\u0131 c\u00fcmlesi uyar\u0131nca bunu yapmak zorundad\u0131r. 4 TV\u00f6D (VKA)<\/em> Aral\u0131k 2007 ay\u0131na ait masa \u00fccreti ile Eyl\u00fcl 2007 ay\u0131na ait masa \u00fccretinin %12’si tutar\u0131nda 2007 y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in farkl\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f performans \u00fccretine hak kazan\u0131r. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato’nun 23 Eyl\u00fcl 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 6 AZR 338\/09 -)<\/em>, talep ne maa\u015f\u0131n \u00f6denmesine ne de Eyl\u00fcl 2007 ay\u0131na ili\u015fkin tazminat talebinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131. D\u00fczenlemenin anlam ve amac\u0131, farkl\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f performans \u00fccretinin son \u00f6deme tarihi olan bir defaya mahsus \u00f6deme olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmektedir. \u00d6deme, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 18 Paragraf uyar\u0131nca \u00f6demenin yerine ge\u00e7er. 2 TV\u00f6D, 2007 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131 i\u00e7in uygulamaya konulacak farkl\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f performans \u00fccretini temsil etmektedir. Bunun i\u00e7in gereken fonlar 2006 y\u0131l\u0131nda olu\u015fturuldu. Bir son tarih d\u00fczenlemesinin bu ama\u00e7la hi\u00e7bir ilgisi olmayacakt\u0131r, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla b\u00f6yle bir norm anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131yla 3. Maddenin 1. F\u0131kras\u0131ndaki genel e\u015fitlik ilkesi ge\u00e7erli olacakt\u0131r. 1 GG ihlal edilecektir. Toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme, Eyl\u00fcl 2007’de \u00f6denmesi gereken \u00fccret tablosuna at\u0131fta bulunarak yaln\u0131zca bir de\u011ferlendirme esas\u0131 olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\tk) ERA-Leistungszulage<\/h2>[vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291911600{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Kuzey Ren-Vestfalya metal ve elektrik end\u00fcstrisindeki (ERA)<\/em> \u00fccret \u00e7er\u00e7eve s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 10 No’lu Maddesi uyar\u0131nca, ge\u00e7ici \u00fccret alan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara, \u00fccret s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan temel ayl\u0131k \u00fccrete ek olarak bir performans primi de verilmektedir. y\u0131ll\u0131k de\u011ferlendirmeye dayanmaktad\u0131r. \u0130\u015fveren, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 10 Paragraf\u0131na uygun olarak \u015funlar\u0131 yapabilir: 6 ERA, y\u0131ll\u0131k performans de\u011ferlendirmelerinin bu de\u011ferin a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7mas\u0131 durumunda, t\u00fcm performans primlerinin operasyonel toplam\u0131n\u0131 %11’e d\u00fczeltir. Ancak yeniden de\u011ferlendirme sonras\u0131nda puanlar\u0131 ayn\u0131 kalan veya artan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar i\u00e7in bu durum performans primlerinin euro tutar\u0131nda bir azalmaya yol a\u00e7mayabilir. Be\u015finci Senato’nun 10 Kas\u0131m 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 5 AZR 603\/09 -),<\/em> toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme koruma maddesi, \u00fccret \u00e7er\u00e7eve s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden sonraki ilk de\u011ferlendirmede zaten uygulan\u0131yor. Madde, \u00f6nceki performans de\u011ferlendirmesinin ERA kriterlerine uygun olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmez. Eine solche Einschr\u00e4nkung kann dem Wortlaut von \u00a7 10 Abs.Madde, \u00f6nceki performans de\u011ferlendirmesinin ERA kriterlerine uygun olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmez. 6 ERA al\u0131namaz. ERA’n\u0131n uygulamaya konulmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nceki ve sonraki de\u011ferlendirme kriterlerindeki farkl\u0131l\u0131k buna engel te\u015fkil etmemektedir. G\u00fcvenlik maddesinin amac\u0131, performans puanlar\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 kalmas\u0131 veya artmas\u0131 durumunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 \u00fccret kesintisinden korumakt\u0131r. Toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmede bu hususlar\u0131n nas\u0131l ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda herhangi bir ayr\u0131m yer alm\u0131yor.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\tl) Sonderverg\u00fctung f\u00fcr Chormitglieder<\/h2>[vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292085760{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]\u00a7 79 paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re. 1 Normal s\u00f6zle\u015fme a\u015famas\u0131 (NV a\u015famas\u0131)<\/em>, di\u011fer \u015feylerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra opera korosu \u00fcyelerine \u00f6denen \u00fccreti de i\u00e7erir. k\u0131sa solo konu\u015fma ve\/veya \u015fark\u0131 s\u00f6yleme performanslar\u0131 telafi edilir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 79 Paragraf uyar\u0131nca daha k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck partilerin devral\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in. \u00d6te yandan, 2 harfli bir NV a\u015famas\u0131n\u0131n uygun bir \u00f6zel \u00fccret \u00f6demesi gerekir. Ayn\u0131 durum 79. Maddenin paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re de ge\u00e7erlidir. 3 NV Sahnesi, m\u00fczikal bir sahne \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n konser performans\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece konserlere kat\u0131l\u0131m i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erlidir. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato’nun 16 Aral\u0131k 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 6 AZR 487\/09 -)<\/em>, opera korosu \u00fcyesinin opera korosu toplulu\u011fundan solist olarak ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda \u201ck\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir k\u0131s\u0131m\u201d \u00f6zel \u00fccrete tabidir. Bu, spesifik \u00fcretimden ve kapsam\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir hizmet sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 varsaymaktad\u0131r. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, Mozart’\u0131n \u201cIdomeneo\u201d operas\u0131n\u0131n icras\u0131nda ve\/veya Edmund Nick’in \u201cLife in Our Time\u201d lirik s\u00fcitinin konser performans\u0131nda yer alan toplam yedi davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davalar ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131kla sonu\u00e7land\u0131. Davac\u0131lar, B\u00f6l\u00fcm 53 NV a\u015famas\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi, ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292093385{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]tahkim a\u015famas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilir. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi ve Eyalet \u0130\u015f Mahkemesinde oldu\u011fu gibi, Y\u00fcksek A\u015fama Tahkim Mahkemesinin tahkim karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik davalar Federal \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131kla sonu\u00e7land\u0131. Y\u00fcksek A\u015famal\u0131 Tahkim Mahkemesi hakl\u0131 olarak davac\u0131lar\u0131n “Idomeneo” operas\u0131ndaki \u015fark\u0131 performanslar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6zel \u00fccret gerektirmeyen k\u0131sa solo performanslar olarak de\u011ferlendirdi. Tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 t\u00fcm \u015fark\u0131 performanslar\u0131nda vokal gruplar\u0131n\u0131n sadece notaya uygun olarak bireysel (\u201csolo\u201d)<\/em> icra edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131, herhangi bir \u00f6zel \u00fccret \u00f6deme zorunlulu\u011funu do\u011furmaz. Y\u00fcksek Sahne Tahkim Mahkemesi, farkl\u0131 manzara unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle, bestecinin m\u00fczikal iradesini somutla\u015ft\u0131ran notaya dayal\u0131 olarak hukuki bir hata yapmam\u0131\u015f ve solo icralar\u0131 k\u0131sa olarak de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Bu ayn\u0131 zamanda \u015eark\u0131 S\u00f6z\u00fc S\u00fcitindeki 5 Nolu Erkek D\u00f6rtl\u00fcs\u00fc i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erliydi. Ayn\u0131 zamanda bir m\u00fczikal sahne \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n konser performans\u0131n\u0131n bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olarak \u015fark\u0131 s\u00f6yleme performanslar\u0131n\u0131 da kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, 79. Maddenin Paragraf\u0131na dayanarak bir iddia da reddedildi. 3 NV a\u015famas\u0131 kapal\u0131.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row content_width=”grid” content_aligment=”center” triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1696926719838{padding-bottom: 10px !important;background-position: center !important;background-repeat: no-repeat !important;background-size: cover !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\t2. Urlaub<\/h2>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292400004{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Bavyera’daki in\u015faat sekt\u00f6r\u00fcndeki ticari \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara y\u00f6nelik genel ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 tatil d\u00fczenlemelerinin (19 May\u0131s 2006’dan itibaren de\u011fi\u015ftirilen)<\/em> 5. ve 6. b\u00f6l\u00fcmleri, Aral\u0131k ay\u0131ndan itibaren Aral\u0131k ay\u0131na kadar olan d\u00f6nemde mevsimlik k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma nedeniyle i\u015f kayb\u0131 nedeniyle tatil \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir. Mart ve k\u0131sa \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma sonucunda ge\u00e7ici i\u015f kayb\u0131 azald\u0131. Buna ek olarak, toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n tatil y\u0131l\u0131nda tatil ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131ndan \u00f6nce talep etme hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu br\u00fct \u00fccretin %11,4’\u00fc oran\u0131nda sabit bir tatil \u00fccreti oran\u0131 belirlemektedir.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292405880{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]\u015fapka. Bu, tatil \u00fccretinin hesaplanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin B\u00f6l\u00fcm 11 Paragraftan sapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelir. 1 c\u00fcmle 3 BUrlG ve bundan \u00a7 11 paragraf. 1 c\u00fcmle 1 BUrlG \u00fc\u00e7-on haftal\u0131k referans d\u00f6nemi. Dokuzuncu Senato’nun 17 Kas\u0131m 2009 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 9 AZR 844\/08 -)<\/em>, bu sapmalar 13. maddenin 13. paragraf\u0131ndaki a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f h\u00fckm\u00fcnden kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r. 1 c\u00fcmle 1 BUrlG kapsanmaktad\u0131r. Senato, sabit \u00fccret oran\u0131n\u0131n da bu kapsamda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunu a\u00e7\u0131k b\u0131rakabildi. Her durumda, mevsimlik k\u0131sa \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00f6dene\u011finde bu sapma, di\u011fer hususlar\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, \u00f6zel a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f h\u00fckm\u00fcnden de etkilenmektedir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 13 Paragrafta in\u015faat sekt\u00f6r\u00fc i\u00e7in. 2 C\u00fcmle 1 BUrlG kaydedildi. TFEU’nun 267. maddesi uyar\u0131nca \u00f6n karar talebi gerekli de\u011fildi. Senato’nun ayr\u0131ca BUrlG’deki a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin ve toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme d\u00fczenlemelerinin 7. maddenin 1. paragraf\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lay\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermesi gerekmedi. 2003\/88\/EC say\u0131l\u0131 Direktifin (\u00c7al\u0131\u015fma S\u00fcresi Direktifi)<\/em> 1’ini do\u011fru \u015fekilde uygulay\u0131n. Bu, \u00dcye Devletlerin her i\u015f\u00e7inin en az d\u00f6rt hafta y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin almas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in gerekli \u00f6nlemleri almas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma S\u00fcresi Direktifi’nin 7. maddesinin yorumlanmas\u0131 hukuki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kla ilgili de\u011fildir.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292413200{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]lich. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma S\u00fcresi Direktifinin asgari y\u0131ll\u0131k izin s\u00fcresince normal \u00fccretlerin kesintiye u\u011framadan (\u00f6rne\u011fin k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00f6nemleri yoluyla)<\/em> \u00f6denmesine devam edilmesini garanti alt\u0131na almak istedi\u011fi varsay\u0131lsa bile, yasal a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme d\u00fczenlemeleri bu hususu dikkate almal\u0131d\u0131r. uygulanmadan kalmas\u0131n. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma S\u00fcreleri Y\u00f6nergesi’nin 7. maddesi \u00f6zel hukuki i\u015flemlerde do\u011frudan uygulanmamaktad\u0131r. D\u00fczenlemelerin direktiflere uygun olarak yorumlanmas\u0131 veya kanunun daha da geli\u015ftirilmesi de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu durum i\u00e7 mevzuat\u0131n lafz\u0131na, sistemine, amac\u0131na ve hukuki ge\u00e7mi\u015fine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacakt\u0131r.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292422873{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Dokuzuncu Senato’nun 23 Mart 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 9 AZR 128\/09 -),<\/em> toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131, Madde 7 Paragraf h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uygun olarak izin ve tatil tazminat\u0131 talep edebilirler. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma S\u00fcresi Direktifi’nin 1. maddesi ve \u00a7\u00a7 1, 3 paragraf\u0131. 1 BUrlG’de, d\u00f6rt haftay\u0131 a\u015fan asgari tatil hakk\u0131 s\u00fcresi serbest\u00e7e d\u00fczenlenebilir. D\u00fczenleme g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcz, yasal izin haklar\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli olan B\u00f6l\u00fcm 7 Paragrafta yer alan y\u00f6nergelere uygun olarak verilen e\u011fitimle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 de\u011fildir. 3 ve 4 BURG (G\u00f6rmek. \u00c7ANTA 24 Mart<\/em> 2009 \u2013 9 AZR 983\/07 -)<\/em> s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131. A\u00e7\u0131k direktif kanununa ve Avrupa Birli\u011fi Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re, toplu olarak mutabakata var\u0131larak yasal tatil hakk\u0131n\u0131n kaybedilmesini ve tazminat\u0131n\u0131 engelleyen bir AB kanunu bulunmamaktad\u0131r. B\u00f6ylece Senato, kanun \u00fcst\u00fc s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayal\u0131 tatil ve tatil tazminat\u0131 taleplerine ili\u015fkin \u00f6nceki i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131, toplu olarak mutabakata var\u0131lan ilgili taleplere aktarm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. (G\u00f6rmek. \u00c7ANTA 24 Mart 2009 \u2013<\/em> 9 AZR 983\/07 -). <\/em>Ayn\u0131 zamanda Senato, yasal ve yasa \u00fcst\u00fc izin haklar\u0131 aras\u0131nda ayr\u0131m yapan (toplu) anla\u015fma taraflar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenleme niyetine dair a\u00e7\u0131k kan\u0131tlar\u0131n olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren yorum kural\u0131na uymaya devam etti. Bunlar genellikle (toplu) s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z d\u00fczenlemeler yoluyla yasal tatil rejiminden b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde koptuklar\u0131nda meydana gelir. Anla\u015fmazl\u0131k olmas\u0131 durumunda Senato bu gereklilikleri onaylad\u0131. Ayr\u0131ca a\u011f\u0131r maluliyet kanunu kapsam\u0131ndaki ek izin hakk\u0131n\u0131n 125. maddenin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 1 c\u00fcmle 1 SGB IX yasal asgari izin kurallar\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlenir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n 7. maddenin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki devir s\u00fcresini a\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle verilememi\u015f olsa bile, ek iznin i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin sona ermesinden sonra telafi edilmesi gerekir. 3 C\u00fcmle 3 BUrlG hastayd\u0131 ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fam\u0131yordu. Me\u015fru beklentilerin korunmas\u0131 ilkesi bununla \u00e7eli\u015fmemektedir. Federal \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi’nin, 1982’den bu yana, i\u015f g\u00f6remezli\u011fin transfer d\u00f6neminin sonuna kadar devam etmesi durumunda izin (tazminat) hakk\u0131n\u0131n kaybedilmesine ili\u015fkin taleplere dayanan uzun s\u00fcredir devam eden i\u00e7tihat\u0131, i\u015fverenin i\u015f\u00e7i haklar\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n devam\u0131na olan g\u00fcvenini hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karmak i\u00e7in uygundu. bu yasal[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292434752{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]konu\u015fmay\u0131 hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karmak i\u00e7in. Ancak, 93\/104\/EC say\u0131l\u0131 ilk \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi direktifinin uygulama s\u00fcresi 23 Kas\u0131m 1996’da sona erdi\u011finden bu g\u00fcven art\u0131k korunmaya de\u011fer de\u011fildi.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292445272{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]13. Maddenin 13. F\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i, 3 Federal Ge\u00e7ici \u0130stihdam Personel Hizmetleri Birli\u011fi’nin 1. ve 2. c\u00fcmleleri. V. toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi (MTV BZA)<\/em> imzalam\u0131\u015fsan\u0131z tatil s\u0131ras\u0131nda toplu olarak kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan \u00fccretin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra Pazar, resmi tatil ve gece \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in toplu olarak kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan ek \u00fccretlere hak kazan\u0131rs\u0131n\u0131z. Diese Bestimmung enth\u00e4lt nach einem Urteil des Neunten Senats vom 21. September 2010 (- 9 AZR 510\/09 -)<\/em> f\u00fcr \u00fcbertarifliche Entgeltbestandteile keine von \u00a7 11 Abs. 1 c\u00fcmle 1 BUrlG sapan d\u00fczenleme. Bir anla\u015fmazl\u0131k olmas\u0131 durumunda, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin taraflar\u0131, toplu olarak kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan maa\u015fa ek olarak, m\u00fc\u015fteriyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00f6dene\u011fi ve gece vardiyas\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7in sabit bir \u00fccret \u00fczerinde anla\u015fm\u0131\u015flard\u0131. Her iki tazminat bile\u015feni de B\u00f6l\u00fcm 11 Para. 1 C\u00fcmle 1 BUrlG, tatil \u00fccreti ve tatil tazminat\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanmas\u0131nda temel olarak kullan\u0131lacakt\u0131r. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 13 Paragraf\u0131n metni. 3 MTV BZA, toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin \u00fczerindeki tazminat bile\u015fenlerinin tatil s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00f6denmemesi gerekti\u011fine dair hi\u00e7bir g\u00f6sterge i\u00e7ermemektedir. Yasal asgari izin i\u00e7in, toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme taraflar\u0131n\u0131n, \u00fccreti d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmek amac\u0131yla, tatille ilgili muafiyet (ola\u011fan \u00fccretin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gereklili\u011fi)<\/em> olmasayd\u0131 olu\u015facak \u00fccret bile\u015fenlerini hesaplaman\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda b\u0131rakma yetkisi olmayacakt\u0131. 13 paragraf. 1 BUrlG, ihlal edilen d\u00fczenlemelerin kabul edilemeyecek \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi. Tatil ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131ndan \u00f6nceki referans d\u00f6nemlerinde kazan\u0131lan ortalama vardiyal\u0131 gece \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00f6dene\u011finin ne kadar y\u00fcksek oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bilgi eksikli\u011fi nedeniyle Senato, hukuki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verdi.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row content_width=”grid” content_aligment=”center” triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1696926719838{padding-bottom: 10px !important;background-position: center !important;background-repeat: no-repeat !important;background-size: cover !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\t3. Freizeitausgleich<\/h2>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292513704{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]B\u00f6l\u00fcm 12 Paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re. Belediye i\u015fveren birlikleri birli\u011fi b\u00f6lgesindeki belediye hastanelerindeki doktorlara y\u00f6nelik toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 4’\u00fc (TV doktorlar\u0131\/VKA) <\/em>30 Nisan 2010 tarihine kadar ge\u00e7erli olan versiyonda (\u00a7 12 paragraf 5 TV-\u00c4rzt\/VKA’dan beri) <\/em>\u0130\u015fveren, \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 \u00fczerine verilen hizmetler i\u00e7in hesaplanan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerini \u00f6demeyi veya bo\u015f zaman yoluyla telafi etmeyi se\u00e7me hakk\u0131na sahiptir. \u0130\u015fverenin, doktoru i\u015f yapma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden kurtarmas\u0131 ve b\u00f6ylece doktorun planlanan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerini azaltmas\u0131 durumunda, telafi edici izin verilir. Hekim, s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 hizmetini tamamlad\u0131ktan sonra i\u015f yapmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ise, asl\u0131nda s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye uyma nedeniyle \u00fccretlendirilebilir.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292522720{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]ArbZG’nin 5. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca dinlenme s\u00fcresinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131z gerekmiyorsa, bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde telafi edici bo\u015f zaman da sa\u011flanabilir. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Senato’nun 22 Temmuz 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 6 AZR 78\/09 -),<\/em> ne telafi edici izinlerin amac\u0131 ne de ArbZG’nin 5. Maddesi bununla \u00e7eli\u015fmektedir. Dinlenme s\u00fcresinin verilmesi, doktorun i\u015f g\u00f6revlerinden \u00fccretsiz olarak sal\u0131verilmesini gerektirmez. Belirleyici olan tek unsur, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n yasal olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi olarak s\u0131n\u0131fland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kullan\u0131lmamas\u0131d\u0131r. Tek belirleyici fakt\u00f6r, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n yasal olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu olmamas\u0131d\u0131r.ArbZG’nin 5. Maddesi, i\u015fverenin s\u00f6zle\u015fme yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n dinlenme s\u00fcresi boyunca i\u015f yapmas\u0131 gerekmedi\u011fini garanti etti\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmemektedir. Gerek\u00e7eli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi olarak s\u0131n\u0131fland\u0131rma. Ayr\u0131ca \u00a7 12 paragraf. Toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 4. maddesi \u201cdaha \u200b\u200bfazla bo\u015f zaman\u201d garanti etmeyi ama\u00e7lam\u0131yor. Bu nedenle doktora \u00fccretsiz dinlenme s\u00fcresi ve \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 \u00fczerine g\u00f6revini tamamlad\u0131ktan sonra \u00fccretli izin hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmaz.<\/p>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row content_width=”grid” content_aligment=”center” triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1696926719838{padding-bottom: 10px !important;background-position: center !important;background-repeat: no-repeat !important;background-size: cover !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\t4. Wettbewerbsverbot<\/h2>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292564241{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Bir i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin yasal olarak var oldu\u011fu s\u00fcre boyunca, ilgili bireysel veya toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme d\u00fczenlemeleri olmasa bile, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015fverenine zarar verecek her t\u00fcrl\u00fc rekabet\u00e7i faaliyette bulunmas\u0131 esasen yasakt\u0131r (yaln\u0131zca bkz. BAG 20 Eyl\u00fcl 2006 – 10 AZR 439\/05 -). 24 Mart 2010 tarihli bir kararla (- 10 AZR 66\/09 -), Onuncu Senato, bunun en iyi ihtimalle rakip \u015firket i\u00e7in ikincil d\u00fczeyde ekonomik deste\u011fe yol a\u00e7abilecek basit (yan) faaliyetler i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusundaki endi\u015felerini dile getirdi ve aksi takdirde i\u015fverenin korunmaya de\u011fer menfaatlerini etkilemez. Mevcut i\u015f ili\u015fkisinde rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kapsam\u0131 belirlenirken 12. maddenin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmleri dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r. 1 GG \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n korunan mesleki \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu, bireysel vakan\u0131n t\u00fcm ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n genel de\u011ferlendirmesinin bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olarak, di\u011fer faaliyetin i\u015fverenin \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131 tehlikeye at\u0131p atmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n veya zarar verip vermedi\u011finin belirlenmesi gerekti\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir. Bir karar \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 durumunda Senato bu soruyu ask\u0131da b\u0131rakabilir. Davac\u0131y\u0131 ilgilendiren toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi d\u00fczenlemeleri nedeniyle, devam eden i\u015f ili\u015fkisi s\u0131ras\u0131nda genel rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar lehine s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Rakip bir \u015firkette ikincil istihdam, ancak \u201cdo\u011frudan rekabet\u201d nedenlerinin buna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 halinde yasaklanabilir. Bu t\u00fcr nedenler yaln\u0131zca \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n konumu veya faaliyet t\u00fcr\u00fc, i\u015fverenin korunmaya de\u011fer \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131na do\u011frudan zarar verme tehdidinde bulundu\u011funda mevcuttur. Anla\u015fmazl\u0131k durumunda Senato bu \u015fartlar\u0131 reddetti. \u0130\u015f ili\u015fkisinin sona ermesinden sonraki d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in kabul edilen bir rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi B\u00f6l\u00fcm 74a Para. 1 C\u00fcmle 1 HGB, i\u015fverenin me\u015fru ticari \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131 korumaya hizmet etmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 de\u011fildir. Onuncu Senato’nun 21 Nisan 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 10 AZR 288\/09 -), i\u015fveren, eski \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n, i\u015fverenin ticari d\u00fczeyde sat\u0131\u015f faaliyetlerini y\u00fcr\u00fctmesini de yasakl\u0131yorsa, b\u00f6yle bir menfaatten yoksundur. operasyona dahil de\u011fildir. Bu durumda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n, ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k tazminat\u0131na hak kazanabilmesi i\u00e7in, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n yasa\u011f\u0131n ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zetmesi yeterlidir. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 74 Paragraf\u0131n aksine. HGB 2’ye g\u00f6re, do\u011fum izni tazminat\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 maddesinin tamam\u0131na uyum lehine se\u00e7im hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 de\u011fildir. Bu, Madde 74a Paragraf\u0131ndaki a\u00e7\u0131k farkl\u0131la\u015fma ile g\u00f6sterilmektedir. Yasa\u011f\u0131n ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 ve ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olmayan k\u0131sm\u0131 aras\u0131nda 1 HGB. Ayr\u0131ca, telafi edici izin hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olmayan k\u0131sm\u0131nda yasa\u011fa uymas\u0131na da ba\u011fl\u0131 olmas\u0131, bu normun koruyucu amac\u0131na ve Temel Kanun’un 12. maddesinde korunan mesleki \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacakt\u0131r. S\u00f6zle\u015fme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nedeniyle, Onuncu Senato’nun 14 Temmuz 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 10 AZR 291\/09 -), \u00f6n s\u00f6zle\u015fmelere rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinde dahi genel olarak izin verilmektedir. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan, \u00f6n s\u00f6zle\u015fmede, i\u015fverenin talebi \u00fczerine s\u00f6zle\u015fme sonras\u0131 rekabet etmeme maddesini sonu\u00e7land\u0131rmay\u0131 taahh\u00fct ederse, bu \u00f6n s\u00f6zle\u015fme B\u00f6l\u00fcm 74a Para. 1 Alman Ticaret Kanunu’nun 1. c\u00fcmlesi, i\u015fverene tan\u0131nan opsiyonun, fesih bildiriminin verilmesine veya fesih s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131na kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmamas\u0131 durumunda ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 de\u011fildir. Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe ili\u015fkin sabit bir s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n durumu ve menfaatleri, izin verilemez ko\u015fullu rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcndekilere benzer (bkz. BAG 22 May\u0131s 1990 – 3 AZR 647\/88 -). Bu durumda \u00f6n s\u00f6zle\u015fme, ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olmayan bir rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc etkisine sahip oldu\u011fundan, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, \u00f6n s\u00f6zle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda tazminats\u0131z rekabet \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile rekabet etmeme aras\u0131nda se\u00e7im yapabilir. Ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olmayan bir \u00f6n s\u00f6zle\u015fme durumunda, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n se\u00e7me hakk\u0131n\u0131 nas\u0131l kullanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fverene beyan etmesi gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi konusunda herhangi bir karara gerek duyulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Hukuki anla\u015fmazl\u0131k alt mahkemeye geri g\u00f6nderildi. 74. maddenin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda \u00f6n s\u00f6zle\u015fme i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erli olan yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekil \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fu ana kadar elde edilen bulgulardan netlik kazanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uyuldu\u011fu takdirde 1 HGB’ye uyulmal\u0131d\u0131r.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row content_width=”grid” content_aligment=”center” triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1696926719838{padding-bottom: 10px !important;background-position: center !important;background-repeat: no-repeat !important;background-size: cover !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\t5. Vertragsstrafe<\/h2>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292589400{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Standart bir i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde yer alan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayal\u0131 bir ceza s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 makul olmayan bir dezavantajl\u0131 duruma sokar ve bu nedenle B\u00f6l\u00fcm 307 Paragraf 1’e uygundur. 1 BGB, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n, deneme s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde iki hafta \u00f6nceden bildirimde bulunarak s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi ihlal ederek feshedilebilecek i\u015f ili\u015fkisini zaman\u0131ndan \u00f6nce feshetmesi durumunda bir ayl\u0131k br\u00fct maa\u015f tutar\u0131nda s\u00f6zle\u015fme cezas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesi durumunda ge\u00e7ersizdir (BAG) 4 Mart 2004 – 8 AZR 196\/03 -)<\/em> \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015f ili\u015fkisini ancak \u015fu tarihten sonra sonland\u0131rmas\u0131: <\/em>Ablauf der Probezeit unter der Geltung einer K\u00fcndigungsfrist von 12 Wochen zum Mo-natsende vorzeitig vertragswidrig beendet, \u00e4ndert nach einer Entscheidung des Achten Senats vom 23. September 2010 (- 8 AZR 897\/08 -)<\/em> an der Unwirksamkeit der Klausel nichts. Etkinli\u011fin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde belirleyici zaman noktas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin imzalanmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu h\u00fckm\u00fc deneme s\u00fcresi bitiminden \u00f6nce caiz olan k\u0131s\u0131m ve sonra kabul edilmeyen k\u0131s\u0131m olarak ikiye ay\u0131rmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Deneme s\u00fcresi bildirim s\u00fcresinin art\u0131k ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli bir indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131 da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Deneme s\u00fcresi bildirim s\u00fcresinin art\u0131k ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli bir indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131 da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. \u00d6nceden form\u00fcle edilmi\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n riski art\u0131k kullan\u0131c\u0131ya ait olmayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, ek bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme yorumu da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row content_width=”grid” content_aligment=”center” triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1696926719838{padding-bottom: 10px !important;background-position: center !important;background-repeat: no-repeat !important;background-size: cover !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\t6. Schadensersatz und Haftung<\/h2>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292630344{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]B\u00f6l\u00fcm 13 Paragraf\u0131na g\u00f6re. 2 GmbHG’ye g\u00f6re bir GmbH’nin y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri, \u015firketin varl\u0131klar\u0131yla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131d\u0131r. Bir GmbH’nin genel m\u00fcd\u00fcrlerinin ki\u015fisel sorumlulu\u011fu, yaln\u0131zca \u00f6zel bir sorumluluk nedeninin bulunmas\u0131 durumunda istisnai durumlarda dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r (bkz. \u00c7ANTA 21 Kas\u0131m 2006 \u2013 9 AZR 206\/06 -).<\/em> Dokuzuncu Senato \u00f6nceki i\u00e7tihad\u0131na devam ederek 23 \u015eubat 2010’da karar verdi. (-9 AZR 44\/09 -) <\/em>\u00a7 8a paragraf\u0131na karar verdi. 1 AltTZG (31 Aral\u0131k 2008’e kadar de\u011fi\u015ftirilen \u015fekliyle)<\/em>, t\u00fczel ki\u015filerin yasal temsilcileri i\u00e7in do\u011frudan herhangi bir sorumluluk olu\u015fturmaz. Bu standarda g\u00f6re i\u015fveren, kanunda say\u0131lan ko\u015fullar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde, k\u0131smi emeklilik s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, toplam sosyal g\u00fcvenlik katk\u0131 pay\u0131ndan i\u015fveren pay\u0131 da dahil olmak \u00fczere \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n kredi bakiyesini ilk krediyle uygun \u015fekilde mahsup etmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292637169{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]iflas riskine kar\u015f\u0131 korunmak i\u00e7in. \u00a7 8a Abs. 1 AltTZG aF yaln\u0131zca i\u015fverene ili\u015fkin koruyucu bir yasad\u0131r. \u00a7 823 Abs. 2 BGB. Yasal temsilcileri standard\u0131n muhatab\u0131 de\u011fildir. D\u00fczenleme yaln\u0131zca \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015fveren kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda konumunu g\u00fc\u00e7lendirmeyi ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 7e Paragraf\u0131n\u0131n 1 Ocak 2009 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren versiyonu. 7 SGB IV’\u00fcn 2. c\u00fcmlesi, yasama organ\u0131n\u0131n bu tarihten bu yana yaln\u0131zca de\u011ferli varl\u0131klara ili\u015fkin genel iflas korumas\u0131nda ki\u015fisel sorumlulu\u011fu d\u00fczenleme iradesine sahip oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermektedir. Buna g\u00f6re, genel m\u00fcd\u00fcr B\u00f6l\u00fcm 823 Paragraf\u0131 uyar\u0131nca sorumlu tutulabilir. 2 BGB iVm. \u00a7 8a Abs. 1 AltTZG aF garant\u00f6r pozisyonundan elde edilemez. S\u00f6zde g\u00fcven ihlalinin \u00f6nko\u015fullar\u0131 da (StGB Madde 266 F\u0131kra 1 Alt. 2 StGB)<\/em> kararda kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 8a Para. 1 AltTZG’nin amac\u0131, g\u00fcvenin ihlali i\u00e7in gerekli olan g\u00fcvene dayal\u0131 bir \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olu\u015fturmakt\u0131; dava edilen genel m\u00fcd\u00fcrlerin en az\u0131ndan ko\u015fullu niyetini akla getirecek hi\u00e7bir olgu tespit edilmedi.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292643512{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine g\u00f6re bir hedef s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015fken maa\u015f bile\u015fenine hak kazanmas\u0131 durumunda, bu durum i\u015fverenin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla bir hedef s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 konusunda m\u00fczakere etme ve ona ilgili hedef d\u00f6nemi i\u00e7in ger\u00e7ek\u00e7i hedefler sunma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcyle sonu\u00e7lan\u0131r. Hedef anla\u015fmaya var\u0131lamamas\u0131 halinde i\u015fveren, hedef s\u00fcrenin bitiminden sonra 280. maddenin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca sorumludur. 1, Abs. 3, \u00a7 283 c\u00fcmle 1, \u00a7 252 BGB, hedef anla\u015fmaya ula\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131ndan sorumlu olmas\u0131 durumunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana kaybedilen \u00fccret i\u00e7in tazminat \u00f6demekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr (\u00c7ANTA<\/em> 10 Aral\u0131k 2008 \u2013 10 AZR 889\/07 -). <\/em>Onuncu Senato’nun 12 May\u0131s 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re, i\u015fverenin ilgili d\u00f6nemde ula\u015f\u0131lacak hedefler konusunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc devam etmektedir. (-10 AZR 390\/09 -) <\/em>i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi taraflar\u0131n\u0131n, bir takip s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yap\u0131lana kadar hedef s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin uygulamaya devam etmesi konusunda mutabakata varmas\u0131 durumunda da d\u00fczenli olarak mevcuttur. Kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan sonradan etki, s\u00fcresi dolmu\u015f hedef s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ge\u00e7erlili\u011finin ge\u00e7ici olarak devam etmesiyle sonu\u00e7lan\u0131r. Ancak daha sonraki bir hedef anla\u015fmaya ili\u015fkin m\u00fczakere y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri basit bir \u015fekilde \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmemektedir. Senato \u00f6nceki bulgulara dayanarak daval\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015fmazl\u0131kta m\u00fczakere y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini kusurlu bir \u015fekilde ihlal edip etmedi\u011fine karar veremedi\u011finden, hukuki anla\u015fmazl\u0131k yeni bir duru\u015fma ve karar i\u00e7in Eyalet \u0130\u015f Mahkemesine geri g\u00f6nderildi.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292650840{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]\u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n su\u00e7unu a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131c\u0131 bir \u015fekilde kabul etmesi durumunda, Sekizinci Senato’nun 22 Temmuz 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 8 AZR 144\/09 -),<\/em> bu itiraf\u0131 yaparken bildi\u011fi itirazlarla birlikte hari\u00e7 tutulur veya en az\u0131ndan bunu bekliyordu. Su\u00e7un kabul edilmesi, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n tazminat \u00f6deme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve tutar\u0131n\u0131 taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131ktan ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131yorsa, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, i\u015fverenin bu tutardaki zarar\u0131 kan\u0131tlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya bunu yaln\u0131zca kabul edilemez y\u00f6ntemlerle kan\u0131tlayabildi\u011fine daha sonra itiraz edemez. Ancak ahlaks\u0131zl\u0131ktan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7un kabul\u00fc 138. maddenin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131labilir. Performans ve de\u011ferlendirme aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zle g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr bir orant\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131k varsa 1 BGB ge\u00e7ersiz olabilir. Burada \u00f6nemli olan, taraflar aras\u0131nda karara ba\u011flanan zarar\u0131n kan\u0131t\u0131 de\u011fil, daha ziyade taraflar\u0131n kabul s\u0131ras\u0131nda kaydedilen zarar miktar\u0131na nas\u0131l ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak \u00f6zellikle uygun ko\u015fullar alt\u0131nda sa\u011flanabilen mali hizmetlerin kendi sorumlulu\u011funda \u00fcstlenilmesi prensip olarak ahlaka ayk\u0131r\u0131 de\u011fildir. Bu, \u00f6zellikle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n kendi yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 eylemlerinden kaynaklanan ve bir onay yoluyla d\u00fczenlenmesi gereken y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda ge\u00e7erlidir. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n \u00f6nemli miktarda zimmete para ge\u00e7irdi\u011fini itiraf etmesi ve ard\u0131ndan i\u015fverenin su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunmakla tehdit etmesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ahlaka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir durum te\u015fkil etmez. Ayr\u0131ca hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 tehditler nedeniyle bir meydan okuma anlam\u0131nda. \u00a7 123 BGB hari\u00e7tir. \u00d6nerilen davran\u0131\u015f, izledi\u011fi ama\u00e7 ve ikisi aras\u0131ndaki ba\u011flant\u0131dan daha yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 de\u011fildir.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row content_width=”grid” content_aligment=”center” triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1696926719838{padding-bottom: 10px !important;background-position: center !important;background-repeat: no-repeat !important;background-size: cover !important;}”][vc_column]\n

\n\t7. Ausschlussfristen<\/h2>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292697336{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]BAT B\u00f6l\u00fcm 70 C\u00fcmle 1’e g\u00f6re, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinden kaynaklanan talepler, vade tarihinden itibaren alt\u0131 ayl\u0131k bir engelleme s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi takdirde sona erer. D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Senato’nun 7 Temmuz 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 4 AZR 549\/08 -),<\/em> beyannamenin \u015fahsen isim imzas\u0131yla imzalanmas\u0131 zorunlu de\u011fildir. Bu \u00a7 126 paragraf. Alman Medeni Kanununun (BGB) 1. Maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekil \u015fart\u0131 ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir. \u0130ddiada bulunmak hukuki bir i\u015flem de\u011fil, hukuki i\u015fleme benzer bir eylemdir. Hari\u00e7 tutma s\u00fcresinin anlam\u0131 ve amac\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn benzer bir uygulamas\u0131 da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bunun yerine Alman Medeni Kanunu’nun (BGB) 126b maddesi uyar\u0131nca metin formuna uygunluk yeterlidir. Daha sonra beyan\u0131n, ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak kal\u0131c\u0131 olarak \u00e7o\u011falt\u0131lmaya uygun bir belge veya ba\u015fka bir \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292707496{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Beyan sahibinin imzas\u0131 ve beyan\u0131n sonucu, isim imzas\u0131n\u0131n kopyalanmas\u0131 veya ba\u015fka bir \u015fekilde tan\u0131nabilir hale getirilebilir. Anlam\u0131nda bir iddia \u00a7 70 c\u00fcmle 1 BAT bu nedenle kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131y\u0131 tan\u0131mlayan ve metnin sonunu bir isimle selamlamayla belirten bir e-posta yoluyla da yap\u0131labilir.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292737169{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Be\u015finci Senato’nun 28 Temmuz 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 5 AZR 521\/09 -),<\/em> i\u015fverenin kendisi i\u00e7in tutulan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi hesab\u0131n\u0131n durumunu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana ko\u015fulsuz olarak bildirmesi, onun \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi dengesini en az a\u015fa\u011f\u0131dakiler kadar tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z olu\u015fturur: Para talebinde g\u00f6sterilen \u00fccret veya maa\u015f bildirimi. Bu nedenle, bir hari\u00e7 tutma s\u00fcresinin s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesi i\u00e7in art\u0131k daha fazla iddiaya gerek yoktur. Bu ayn\u0131 zamanda, \u00f6rne\u011fin bir tazminat s\u00fcresinin sona ermesi veya bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi hesab\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle, telafi edici izin hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6deme talebine d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi durumunda da ge\u00e7erlidir. Zaman kredisine ili\u015fkin olarak \u00f6deme talebi, hari\u00e7 tutma s\u00fcresi anlam\u0131nda yeni bir talep de\u011fildir. Sadece muafiyetin s\u00fcresi dolduktan sonra onun yerini al\u0131r.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700292803040{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Bunlar: www.bundesarbeitsgericht.de[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row content_width=”grid” content_aligment=”center” triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1696926719838{padding-bottom: 10px !important;background-position: center !important;background-repeat: no-repeat !important;background-size: cover !important;}”][vc_column][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row triangle_shape=”no” css=”.vc_custom_1697624231414{padding-bottom: 50px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1700291044255{padding-top: 15px !important;}”]Be\u015finci Senato’nun 17 Mart 2010 tarihli karar\u0131na g\u00f6re (- 5 AZR 301\/09 -), \u00fccretlerin vergiler ve sosyal g\u00fcvenlik primleri dikkate al\u0131nmadan \u00f6denmesine ili\u015fkin anla\u015fma (“siyah”) tek ba\u015f\u0131na net bir anla\u015fma te\u015fkil etmemektedir. \u00fccret anla\u015fmas\u0131. Kara para s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin taraflar\u0131 yaln\u0131zca vergi ve sosyal g\u00fcvenlik primlerinden ka\u00e7\u0131nmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lar, i\u015fverenin bunlar\u0131 \u00f6demesini sa\u011flamay\u0131 ama\u00e7lamaz. Ayr\u0131ca B\u00f6l\u00fcm 14 Paragraftan. 2 SGB IV net \u00fccret s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine uymamaktad\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re ka\u00e7ak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan i\u015f\u00e7i i\u00e7in talep edilecek sosyal g\u00fcvenlik primlerinin toplam\u0131 hesaplan\u0131rken net \u00fccret \u00fczerinde…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9742,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-12596","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nRechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-24T05:10:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@rasteinwachs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"43 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/Ordinary-jurisdiction.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&quality=20&ssl=1\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-18T06:55:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-24T05:10:01+00:00\",\"description\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/Ordinary-jurisdiction.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&quality=20&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/Ordinary-jurisdiction.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&quality=20&ssl=1\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"description\":\"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":[\"Organization\",\"Place\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1\",\"width\":174,\"height\":76,\"caption\":\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/rasteinwachs\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA\"],\"telephone\":[]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","og_description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","og_url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","article_modified_time":"2023-11-24T05:10:01+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@rasteinwachs","twitter_misc":{"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"43 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\/","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Ordinary-jurisdiction.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&quality=20&ssl=1","datePublished":"2023-11-18T06:55:22+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-24T05:10:01+00:00","description":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei f\u00fcr Arbeitsrecht, Arzthaftung, Mietrecht, Gewerbemietrecht ,Gastronomierecht, Immobilienrecht, Schadensersatz Yachtrecht","inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/is-iliskisinden-kaynaklanan-talepler\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Ordinary-jurisdiction.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&quality=20&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Ordinary-jurisdiction.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&quality=20&ssl=1","width":1200,"height":800},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","description":"Wir leisten mehr als Recht bietet","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":["Organization","Place"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#organization","name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck","url":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/logo.webp?fit=174%2C76&quality=80&ssl=1","width":174,"height":76,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Anwalt Hamburg Berlin Bremen Hannover L\u00fcbeck"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/STEINWACHSRechtsanwaltskanzlei\/","https:\/\/x.com\/rasteinwachs","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/steinwachs_rechtsanwaelte\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/stephan-steinwachs-7a270197\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCffmodDlQx81remXm395RWA"],"telephone":[]}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12596","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12596"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12596\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9742"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanzlei-steinwachs.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12596"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}